(→Protecting templates: reply (CD)) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
: I know. I'm protecting them to prevent vandalism. 18:08, 9 July 2021 (BST) | : I know. I'm protecting them to prevent vandalism. 18:08, 9 July 2021 (BST) | ||
: That does not mean that you need to protect ''every'' page. The risk of vandalism in a wiki like this is quite low - only the most user-facing templates (such as the ones that transclude the main page) should have any level of protection. [[User:X010|X010]] ([[User talk:X010|talk]]) 19:29, 9 July 2021 (BST) | : That does not mean that you need to protect ''every'' page. The risk of vandalism in a wiki like this is quite low - only the most user-facing templates (such as the ones that transclude the main page) should have any level of protection. [[User:X010|X010]] ([[User talk:X010|talk]]) 19:29, 9 July 2021 (BST) | ||
:: Well, that would make sense. No user has been registered there since two weeks. [[User:ToMi1|ToMi1]] ([[User talk:ToMi1|talk]]) 19:57, 9 July 2021 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 19:57, 9 July 2021
| Talk page archives | Archive date |
|---|---|
| Archive 1 | 15th June 2019 |
| Archive 2 | 26th January 2020 |
| Archive 3 | 14th September 2020 |
| Archive 4 | 9th July 2021 |
Protecting templates
I don't think we need to do them for most. X010 (talk) 16:22, 9 July 2021 (BST)
- I know. I'm protecting them to prevent vandalism. 18:08, 9 July 2021 (BST)
- That does not mean that you need to protect every page. The risk of vandalism in a wiki like this is quite low - only the most user-facing templates (such as the ones that transclude the main page) should have any level of protection. X010 (talk) 19:29, 9 July 2021 (BST)
