Search results

1.07 1.10 1.12 MS-DOS ...I use data files created using previous versions of MS-COBOL to convert to 1.12-style data files?

Version History for Microsoft COBOL for MS-DOS 1.07 1.10 1.12 2.00 2.10 2.20 3.00 3.00a 4.00 4.50 MS-DOS

1.12 2.00 2.10 MS-DOS ...lly comparable to Version 1.12, and ISAM processing is faster than Version 1.12.

Version History for Microsoft COBOL for MS-DOS and OS/2 1.07 1.10 1.12 2.00 2.10 2.20 3.00 3.00a | 3.00 3.00a MS-DOS | OS/2

1.07 1.12 MS-DOS Summary: Versions 1.07 and 1.12 of MS-COBOL lose track of records in Index Sequential files. This problem w

1.12 MS-DOS ...Sequential files. Microsoft has confirmed this to be a problem in Version 1.12. This problem was corrected in Version 2.00.

1.10 1.12 2.00 2.10 2.20 3.00 | 3.00 MS-DOS | OS/2 | - Microsoft COBOL for MS-DOS, versions 1.1, 1.12, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, and 3.0 - Microsoft COBOL for OS/2, version 3.0

1.07 1.10 1.12 MS-DOS ...le handles are used. You can use FCBs (File Control Blocks), which are the MS-DOS Version 1.x methods of handling files. Under COBOL Version 2.00, you can us

1.07 1.10 1.12 2.00 2.10 2.20 3.00 3.00a | 3.00 3.00a MS-DOS | OS/2 | - Microsoft COBOL for MS-DOS, versions 1.07, 1.1, 1.12, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 3.0, and 3.0a - Microsoft COBOL for OS/2, versions 3.0 and

1.10 1.12 MS-DOS ...his to be a problem in Version 1.10. This problem was corrected in Version 1.12.

1.12 2.00 2.10 2.20 2.20a 3.00 3.00a 4.00 | 3.00 3.00a 4.00 MS-DOS | OS/2 ...S/2). This is also true for COBOL 4.00, which comes with NMAKE.EXE version 1.12 instead of MAKE.EXE.

Explanation of Color Enhancements Made in Version 1.12 1.12 MS-DOS

Enhancements Made to COBOL Version 1.12 1.12 MS-DOS

1.10 MS-DOS | - Microsoft COBOL for MS-DOS, version 1.1

1.07 1.10 1.12 2.00 2.10 2.20 MS-DOS ...hat was made to MS-DOS Version 3.00. The same behavior is exhibited with a MS-DOS “COPY filename PRN” command.

1.10 MS-DOS | - Microsoft COBOL for MS-DOS, version 1.1

1.07 1.12 2.00 2.10 2.20 3.00 3.00a 4.00 4.50 MS-DOS ...me > PRN Please note that the READY TRACE command is supported only in the MS-DOS version of Microsoft COBOL.

1.07 1.10 1.12 2.00 2.10 2.20 MS-DOS ...option is used. In this case, files should be generated or copied using an MS-DOS COBOL Version 2.00 program to produce the correct end-of-file.

1.07 1.10 1.12 MS-DOS

1.07 1.10 1.12 2.00 2.10 2.20 3.00 3.00a | 3.00 3.00a MS-DOS | OS/2 | - Microsoft COBOL for MS-DOS, versions 1.07, 1.1, 1.12, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 3.0 and 3.0a - Microsoft COBOL for OS/2, versions 3.0 and 3

1.10 MS-DOS | - Microsoft COBOL for MS-DOS, version 1.1

2.10 2.20 | 1.10 1.12 2.00 2.10 2.20 3.00 3.00a 4.00 4.50 | 4.68 XENIX | MS-DOS | CP/M-80 ...BOL versions 1.10, 1.12, 2.00, 2.10, 2.20, 3.00, 3.00a, 4.00, and 4.50 for MS-DOS, and for versions 2.10 and 2.20 for XENIX.

2.00 MS-DOS ...r switch (/O) is available for programs that have tabs set for the default MS-DOS COBOL Version 1.00 settings.

1.12 2.00 2.10 2.20 MS-DOS ...pplies to Microsoft COBOL Compiler Versions 1.12, 2.00, 2.10, and 2.20 for MS-DOS.

1.10 MS-DOS | - Microsoft COBOL for MS-DOS, version 1.1

1.10 MS-DOS | - Microsoft COBOL for MS-DOS, version 1.1

1.10 MS-DOS ...error at compilation, but does not. This problem was corrected in Version 1.12.

1.10 MS-DOS ...in a single screen item declaration. This problem was corrected in Version 1.12.

1.10 MS-DOS | - Microsoft COBOL for MS-DOS, version 1.1

3.00 3.00a | 3.00 3.00a MS-DOS | OS/2 | - Microsoft COBOL for MS-DOS and OS/2, versions 3.0 and 3.0a

NMAKE version 1.11, 1.12, 1.13, or 1.2 macros that are the same but have a different case cannot be ...in NMAKE versions 1.11, 1.12, 1.13, and 1.2 for MS-DOS and versions 1.11, 1.12, and 1.13 for OS/2. This problem was corrected in NMAKE version 1.3.

1.10 MS-DOS | - Microsoft COBOL for MS-DOS, version 1.1

1.10 MS-DOS ...M targets, do not compile correctly. This problem was corrected in Version 1.12.

1.10 MS-DOS ...f range, it is not handled properly. This problem was corrected in Version 1.12.

1.10 MS-DOS ...e character are handled incorrectly. This problem was corrected in Version 1.12.

1.10 MS-DOS ...is a known problem with Version 1.10 This problem was corrected in Version 1.12.

1.07 1.10 1.12 2.00 2.10 2.20 3.00 3.00a 4.00 | 3.00 3.00a 4.00 MS-DOS | OS/2 ...nter control codes can be sent to printers from COBOL versions 1.07, 1.10, 1.12, 2.00, 2.10, 2.20, 3.00, 3.00a, and 4.00. Note: Different printers usually

1.07 1.10 1.12 2.00 2.10 2.20 MS-DOS

1.10 MS-DOS ...is a known problem in Version 1.10. This problem was corrected in Version 1.12.

1.10 MS-DOS ...nnot be found in random access mode. This problem was corrected in Version 1.12.

* Microsoft NMAKE Utility for MS-DOS 1.01 * Microsoft NMAKE Utility for MS-DOS 1.11

1.10 MS-DOS ...his to be a problem in Version 1.10. This problem was corrected in Version 1.12.

# Microsoft Basic Compiler Versions 6.00, 6.00b and 7.00 for MS-DOS and MS OS/2 ...crosoft COBOL Compiler Versions 1.10, 1.12, 2.00, 2.10, 2.20, and 3.00 for MS-DOS

1.10 MS-DOS ...and then flagging a run-time error. This problem was corrected in Version 1.12.

1.07 1.10 1.12 MS-DOS

1.10 MS-DOS ...REBUILD restores the deleted record. This problem was corrected in Version 1.12.

1.10 MS-DOS ...s a known problem with Version 1.10. This problem was corrected in Version 1.12.

1.10 MS-DOS ...s a known problem with Version 1.10. This problem was corrected in Version 1.12.

1.07 1.10 1.12 2.00 2.10 2.20 MS-DOS

...with MASM 6.11, may give an error similar to the following when run on the MS-DOS operating system: ...y if an MS-DOS INCLUDE variable is not set. The error does not occur in an MS-DOS virtual session under Windows 3.1.