All public logs
From BetaArchive Wiki
Combined display of all available logs of BetaArchive Wiki. You can narrow down the view by selecting a log type, the username (case-sensitive), or the affected page (also case-sensitive).
- 20:20, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows NT 4.0/4.0.1289.1 (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "Again Wrong link Gus33000 (talk) 18:53, 12 March 2015 (GMT)")
- 20:19, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows NT 4.0/4.0.1276.1 (content was: "Again wrong link Gus33000 (talk) 18:51, 12 March 2015 (GMT)")
- 20:19, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows NT 4.0/4.0.1228.1 (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "Wrong link, mentions the RTM build without the dot instead of 1228 ;) Gus33000 (talk) 18:46, 12 March 2015 (GMT)")
- 20:18, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows Longhorn/6.0.4003.Lab01 N(forrestf).030116-1035 (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "Move this page to Windows Longhorn/6.0.4003.Lab01 N(forrestf).030116-1035, it's real build tag. Strix (talk) 16:52, 3 March 2020 (GMT)")
- 20:18, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows Longhorn/6.0.3646.Lab01 N(portbld).020612-1346 (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "Hey {{ping|MCpillager}}, do you have any evidence from that thread (which is now locked) to show that this is a real build and not some hackjob like 5056? Rob - Wilson (talk) 02:00, 15 August 2019 (BST) :{{Ping|WILSON2bGg}} How do i know if this is a hackjob if the ISO is heavily corrupted???--Ḿ̴̩̯̐C̴̨̐̌p̵̡͓̓i̴̲̤̐̔͒l̴̡̽̊͝l̵̡͚̦͛͒̒͘a̴̫̽̆̈́g̵͔̭̊̉̿͜͝e̴̥̅͌r̵̙̲̜̊ (...")
- 20:17, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows 98/4.10.1633 (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "Words like hoarding are NOT desirable on the wiki, due to the nature of one's personal reasons why he won't share something. I'd also kindly ask you all to avoid explicitly naming people who are rumoured to have certain builds, because it has proven in the past that such rumors were inaccurate or even false. Also, how can you say the build isn't proven to exist and then outright claim someone has it, without any proof as suggested by...)
- 20:16, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows 98 (Empty or stub page: content before blanking was: "Could we make Windows 98 Second Edition a seperate page? - giantsteen")
- 20:16, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows 8/6.2.7971.0.winmain.110324-1900 (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "Please add an screenshot (or if there are more, add more) of this build, I am sure it exists somewhere. Rob Jansen 12:25, 17 October 2011 (GMT)")
- 20:15, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows 7/6.1.7650.fbl tools debugger(wmbla).100201-1203 (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "== Authenticity == {{ping|SebOno}} You say that the build is unleaked. What proof do we have for its existence? X010 (talk) 20:16, 8 May 2019 (BST)", and the only contributor was "X010" (talk))
- 20:14, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows 2000/5.0.2053.1 (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "== Is this build even real? == It might be a fake")
- 20:14, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows 2000/5.0.1636.1 (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "== Genuine? == Is that proof of the build being real? X010 (talk) 16:04, 6 October 2019 (BST) :Shouldn't be. For all we know this could be a file for IE 5. {{Unsigned|WILSON2bGg}} ::My fully updated install (including IE8 and all updates from WU) of XP SP2 x64 has the same file.--MCpillager (T | C | [[User:MCpillager/San...)
- 20:12, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows 1.0/Development Release 3 (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "Remove this article please. SiPlus 07:46, 30 September 2011 (GMT)")
- 20:12, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows:Visual Styles (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "==XP themes== Will the zune/embedded themes for win xp go in the luna catagory ? --Dans34 20:19, 22 May 2011 (GMT) Zune wasn't included in any OS out of the box. But I'll add Embedded and Royale to the list. Thanks! --Homaaa 20:40, 22 May 2011 (GMT) How is the official name for the "Embedded" style? Just Embedded? --Homaaa 20:42, 22 May 2011 (GMT) good question . not really sure , B...)
- 20:11, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows:NepTune (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "==NepTune?== Seriously guys, I know that one of the Neptune builds had it typeset NepTune, but can't we make it so that it spells out as Neptune? uxdev! 10:47, 20 March 2010 (GMT)PortalCake :I think NepTune is not a typo but it reffers to NT technology. -Fzajac 11:55, 20 March 2010 (GMT) ::Since everybody's taking now the Windows:Neptune article instead of Windows:NepTune anyway, i guess i will...)
- 20:11, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows:NT "Asteroid" (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "Bull. Asteroid was the Windows 2000 Service Pack 1. --AlphaBeta (talk) 21:21, 5 April 2019 (BST)", and the only contributor was "AlphaBeta" (talk))
- 20:10, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows:Longhorn:Hillel Cooperman Demo (content was: "I have written transcripts for the PDC03 videos of Hillel Cooperman that were [http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070414/getting-users-fall-love-software-pdc03-videos/ posted by Long Zheng]. Should they be included in this article? (Maza (talk) 03:22, 15 July 2014 (BST)) : go for it --14px<span style="color:vlue">Dans34</span><sup><span style="color:tomato">Talk</span></sup><sub> </...")
- 20:10, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows:Longhorn:4094 (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "== Source? == Where do the informations come from? Also, about which build is it? There were few builds with build number 4094... that's exactly what i was talking about (naming system). - Fzajac 21:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)", and the only contributor was "Fzajac" (talk))
- 20:10, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Windows:8:6.2.8130.0.winmain.1109xx-xxxx (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "Why is this page in existance already? Do we know anything about this build? I stand for deletion until it either has been released/leaked. Rob Jansen 21:06, 18 September 2011 (GMT) blanked for uselessness Linuxlove 15:47, 19 September 2011 (GMT)")
- 20:09, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:Uru: Ages Beyond Myst:realMYST "huevo.avi" Easter-Egg (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "What is the purpose of this article...? (Maza (talk) 05:56, 24 June 2013 (GMT)) == Why removed.. == Why has the page been removed? I spent hours of analyzing each screenshot and writing up a description for each one. I wouldn't call this "low value"... There were more than 20 screenshots on this page, 90% of them providing an early glimpse at URU: Ages Beyond Myst. If something was wrong (i.e. writt...)
- 20:09, 28 April 2023 ToMi1 talk contribs deleted page Talk:The keys archive (Talk page of deleted or non-existent article: content was: "What's even the point of this and BIOS Dates archive? The information is already available on each build page... --AlphaBeta (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2019 (GMT) : It is meant as a combined repository, and is also part of my plan to migrate forum 'tutorials' like the "Grant Reference Guide" and so on. It might be easier to use this rather than locate each build manually atleast consideri...)