Talk:Next-Generation Secure Computing Base: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:44, 2 September 2014

Question regarding criticism of NGSCB

Where should information about criticism belong? I've thought about adding this information to the development history section, but a part of me feels that a new section dedicated to criticism would be more appropriate. What are your thoughts? (Maza (talk) 01:44, 24 June 2014 (BST))

Bitlocker

I would really, really like to include information about Bitlocker in this article, rather than giving the feature its own article. I know it is already mentioned in the "Legacy" section, but as the vestigial remnant of NGSCB, I feel that it deserves its own section. I've even gone through the trouble of creating a wiki table based on Bitlocker and its relationship to Platform Configuration Registers in the Trusted Platform Module. Are there any objections to giving Bitlocker its own section here? (Maza (talk) 05:38, 2 September 2014 (BST))

i cant see anyone objecting to that , go for it --Dans34^Talk 18:44, 2 September 2014 (BST)

Revision as of 05:38, 2 September 2014 (view source) Maza (talk \| contribs) (→‎Bitlocker: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:44, 2 September 2014 (view source) Dans34 (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	I would really, really like to include information about Bitlocker in this article, rather than giving the feature its own article. I know it is already mentioned in the "Legacy" section, but as the vestigial remnant of NGSCB, I feel that it deserves its own section. I've even gone through the trouble of creating a wiki table based on Bitlocker and its relationship to Platform Configuration Registers in the Trusted Platform Module. Are there any objections to giving Bitlocker its own section here? ([[User:Maza\|Maza]] ([[User talk:Maza\|talk]]) 05:38, 2 September 2014 (BST))		I would really, really like to include information about Bitlocker in this article, rather than giving the feature its own article. I know it is already mentioned in the "Legacy" section, but as the vestigial remnant of NGSCB, I feel that it deserves its own section. I've even gone through the trouble of creating a wiki table based on Bitlocker and its relationship to Platform Configuration Registers in the Trusted Platform Module. Are there any objections to giving Bitlocker its own section here? ([[User:Maza\|Maza]] ([[User talk:Maza\|talk]]) 05:38, 2 September 2014 (BST))

			i cant see anyone objecting to that , go for it --[[Image:neptuneflag.png\|14px]][[User:Dans34\|<span style="color:vlue">Dans34]]</span><sup>[[User_talk:Dans34\|<span style="color:tomato">Talk</span>]]</sup><sub> </sub> 18:44, 2 September 2014 (BST)