Windows 3.x/3.1.61: Difference between revisions

From BetaArchive Wiki
(Created page with "This build is mentioned in PX01168, along with 58 and 60. It could either refer to the original compile of build 61 (as opposed to later compiles b and d), or it's just a gene...")
 
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This build is mentioned in PX01168, along with 58 and 60. It could either refer to the original compile of build 61 (as opposed to later compiles b and d), or it's just a generic name for all compiles of build 61.
This build is mentioned in Microsoft antitrust document [http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/1000/PX01168.pdf PX01168] from January 1992, along with 58 and 60.
 
The document reveals that the build was thoroughly tested and passed most of the tests.
 
It is also mentioned in document [http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/1000/PX01251.pdf PX01251] alongside builds 71, 101 and RCs 1-3, as well as TERMINAL.EXE in early Chicago builds.
 
[[Category:Windows 3.x]]

Latest revision as of 17:39, 16 October 2021

This build is mentioned in Microsoft antitrust document PX01168 from January 1992, along with 58 and 60.

The document reveals that the build was thoroughly tested and passed most of the tests.

It is also mentioned in document PX01251 alongside builds 71, 101 and RCs 1-3, as well as TERMINAL.EXE in early Chicago builds.