SoftPCMuseum (talk | contribs) (Reworded the article so that it is much clearer to understand, and also added in the part about operating system support from Microsoft...) |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Windows 3.1 build 50''' is referenced in a series of Microsoft e-mails from September 30th, 1991. | |||
These e-mails mainly discuss application compatibility with Microsoft Windows 3.1 Beta 2, though this particular version is mentioned in relation with SmartDrive (codenamed Bambi) as "other critical work". | These e-mails mainly discuss application compatibility with Microsoft Windows 3.1 Beta 2, though this particular version is mentioned in relation with SmartDrive (codenamed Bambi) as "other critical work". | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
[http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/7000/PX07624.pdf PX07624] | [http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/7000/PX07624.pdf PX07624] | ||
[[Category:Windows 3.x]] | |||
Latest revision as of 10:48, 2 October 2021
Windows 3.1 build 50 is referenced in a series of Microsoft e-mails from September 30th, 1991.
These e-mails mainly discuss application compatibility with Microsoft Windows 3.1 Beta 2, though this particular version is mentioned in relation with SmartDrive (codenamed Bambi) as "other critical work".
It was also mentioned in the same series of e-mails that the development team planning on putting code in place that would make sure that Microsoft Windows 3.1 would only run on Microsoft MS-DOS, since only Microsoft MS-DOS and IBM DOS were supported for running Windows.
