User talk:Fzajac: Difference between revisions
From BetaArchive Wiki
(Created page with '==Windows 1== What do you think to this , all i have changed is the location of the box pic User_talk:Dans34/SandBox/Windows1 --~~~~') |
(→Naming system for articles: new section) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
What do you think to this , all i have changed is the location of the box pic [[User_talk:Dans34/SandBox/Windows1]] --[[User:Dans34|Dans34]] 17:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | What do you think to this , all i have changed is the location of the box pic [[User_talk:Dans34/SandBox/Windows1]] --[[User:Dans34|Dans34]] 17:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
>> Seems ok :) Apply the change if you want. I think we should more focus on creating new articles and correct the incorrectly named ones, that's a cosmetic thing but i agree it looks nicer and you could apply it. - [[User:Fzajac|Fzajac]] 17:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Naming system for articles == | |||
What scheme should we use exactly? This one (Windows:Longhorn:4074:idx02) or this one (Windows:Longhorn:4074.idx02.040425-1535)? I think there should be consensus. - [[User:Emir214|Emir214]] 00:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:52, 20 March 2010
Windows 1
What do you think to this , all i have changed is the location of the box pic User_talk:Dans34/SandBox/Windows1 --Dans34 17:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
>> Seems ok :) Apply the change if you want. I think we should more focus on creating new articles and correct the incorrectly named ones, that's a cosmetic thing but i agree it looks nicer and you could apply it. - Fzajac 17:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Naming system for articles
What scheme should we use exactly? This one (Windows:Longhorn:4074:idx02) or this one (Windows:Longhorn:4074.idx02.040425-1535)? I think there should be consensus. - Emir214 00:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
