User talk:Dans34: Difference between revisions
(→Contact?: new section) |
m (→Contact?) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Do you have WLM? Mine is fzajac92@gmail.com, could you contact me? | Do you have WLM? Mine is fzajac92@gmail.com, could you contact me? | ||
added you @ 17:34 |
Revision as of 18:34, 19 March 2010
Tables - what for?
Hello, you've just edited the Windows:95:224 article inserting the content in tables. IMHO, that isn't correct way to edit wiki, tables aren't here for that pourpose. - Fzajac 17:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
it looks better with them tables besides we all like abit of color --Dans34 17:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
>>it isn't done this way in any wiki i've seen or edited. I think it will just become too colorful and hard to read when all articles will look like this... Wikis are simple & minimalistic ;-) - Fzajac 17:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
surely the current revision looks better than http://www.betaarchive.co.uk/wiki/index.php?title=Windows:95:224&oldid=113 << plain
This article is bad example at all, it's lack of content. And the tables will be PITA... we can build articles in interesting ways without them, see Windows:1. 2 images, clear description, clear sections, just good looking - Fzajac 17:10, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Contact?
Do you have WLM? Mine is fzajac92@gmail.com, could you contact me?
added you @ 17:34