BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 6d, 2h, 58m | CPU: 8% | MEM: 2372MB of 5255MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 PostPost subject: Windows Movie Maker        Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 2:32 am 
Reply with quote
Offline

Joined
Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:44 pm

Posts
1

Favourite OS
7601 SP1 x64
What do you guys think of Windows Movie Maker? Specifically, I'd like to hear thoughts on Movie Maker 1.0 mainly, but 1.1, 2.0, 2.1, 2.5, and 2.6 are fair game. Do you think they are actually good editors? How do you think they stack up to Windows Live Movie Maker (something I hate) and contemporary versions of iMovie to the WMM builds.

My personal thoughts - they all have good, intuitive user interfaces, but I find little use for them because they lack support for file formats like MOV and MP4 (mainly having support for AVI, WMV, and MPEG/MPEG-2) - though WMM6 is little better. I heard Windows Movie Maker 2.5 was at least HD, but I haven't used it, and I don't know the deal with 2.6. Any of you know?


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Windows Movie Maker        Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:49 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:46 am

Posts
188

Favourite OS
OltScript System
There is also version 6.0 of Windows Movie Maker which is less buggy and accepts MP4 files !
For MOV files, I do not know, I think... 8-)

Link Of Download : http://movies.blainesville.com/p/wmm-60 ... ows-7.html
It's the better version for me ! :D

_________________
For more information of OltScript System : http://www.win3x.org/win3board/viewtopi ... 69&t=15677
>>> http://internetometer.com/give/46797
Image


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject: Re: Windows Movie Maker        Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2018 11:18 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sun Mar 16, 2014 6:56 am

Posts
116

Favourite OS
DOS
I used to use some old versions like 2.1 (and probably earlier) on Windows XP, and they were quite adequate for capturing video from IEEE 1394, doing some reasonable editing, and exporting to usable formats. I was a bit disappointed that there wasn't fine-grained control over the output - you just got to pick from a list of predefined settings - but it was good enough for me, and simple.

I never tried importing existing video, and I wouldn't be surprised to hear that it was limited in what it could import, although I would have hoped that it might support importing anything you have a codec installed for.

I also didn't like the Live versions (although I can't remember why), and last time I needed to do some video capture and editing from my old camera I found an old PC with an older version of Movie Maker to do it!


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Windows Movie Maker        Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2018 11:57 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:28 am

Posts
1204

Location
Slovenia

Favourite OS
5111
The Live version gives you a bit more control over the output format IIRC, though it has the ribbon (which some people hate with a passion) and limits you in terms of the effects. It's been years since I last used any Movie Maker version though, so I'm not 100% sure about this. It does the job for some basic editing etc., but if you need something more it's inadequate of course.

_________________
KRNL386 - A site about retro computing
My MEGA storage for betas and abandonware


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Windows Movie Maker        Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2018 4:23 pm 
Reply with quote
Offline

Joined
Sat Feb 03, 2018 8:08 pm

Posts
9
Yeah same, used the live version of Movie Maker for high school projects. Personally I thought the ribbon was ok but poorly organized, and the timeline layout and task pane of Windows XP's version was way better.
Live was way too dumbed down, the old version just worked with basically no learning curve


Last edited by MrBurgerKing on Sat Feb 17, 2018 11:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Windows Movie Maker        Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:25 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Sep 13, 2017 1:26 am

Posts
105

Location
Somewhere in Mexico.

Favourite OS
Windows Longhorn 6.0.4093
Did you know that there was going to be Windows Movie Maker 3.0?

Before the Vista Reset, in build 4093, you can actually find a Movie Maker that says 3.0 in the about box. And in my personal opinion, that Movie Maker was just great (It was actually black, and was a bit Vegas Pro style)

_________________
The future is the Free Software, it just needs refining itself!


Top  Profile  YIM
 PostPost subject: Re: Windows Movie Maker        Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2018 10:29 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:46 am

Posts
188

Favourite OS
OltScript System
I hate too the Live version... ! :o

_________________
For more information of OltScript System : http://www.win3x.org/win3board/viewtopi ... 69&t=15677
>>> http://internetometer.com/give/46797
Image


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject: Re: Windows Movie Maker        Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:29 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:08 am

Posts
717

Location
Washington State

Favourite OS
OS X 10.5.8
I've used Windows Movie Maker (including Live) quite often during my childhood. I understand that the Live versions were limited compared to the earlier bundled versions, but I actually still enjoyed it, especially because the Live versions gave me more control over format choices and supported HD video unlike the XP (2.x) versions.

As far as Movie Maker 1.0 (from Windows ME and early Whistler builds) and 1.1 (XP RTM/SP1) go, those are severely lacking in features compared to the newer versions, IIRC the only things those two were useful for were capturing video and exporting basic "cut & paste" style videos. Movie Maker 2.x is where it really shined, but then again, what did you expect from a first version?

Movie Maker 2.6 is basically the later XP Movie Maker for Windows Vista and 7, it was mainly intended for users of low-end XPDM video adapters, but it does have a place for nostalgia.

I haven't really used Movie Maker 6.0 so I don't have much to say about it, I will say that it's good that version has HD support so anyone who didn't like the Live Movie Maker versions and owned an HD camcorder had something to use instead.

That being said, I rarely use Windows Movie Maker anymore, I do crank it up once in a while for the occasional attempt at some cheeky (but private) YTP style videos but that's about it.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Windows Movie Maker        Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2018 7:02 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Sun Jul 01, 2012 7:32 am

Posts
488
Pikavolt321 wrote:
What do you guys think of Windows Movie Maker? Specifically, I'd like to hear thoughts on Movie Maker 1.0 mainly, but 1.1, 2.0, 2.1, 2.5, and 2.6 are fair game. Do you think they are actually good editors? How do you think they stack up to Windows Live Movie Maker (something I hate) and contemporary versions of iMovie to the WMM builds.

If you don't mind me asking, why do you hate Windows Live Movie Maker?
SistemaRayoXP wrote:
Did you know that there was going to be Windows Movie Maker 3.0?

Before the Vista Reset, in build 4093, you can actually find a Movie Maker that says 3.0 in the about box. And in my personal opinion, that Movie Maker was just great (It was actually black, and was a bit Vegas Pro style)

Windows Movie Maker in Windows Vista is visually similar to the design seen in build 4093 (and is also colored black).


Top  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2018

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS