WikiEditor extension?

Problem with the site? Got a suggestion? Got feedback? Post here and the staff will discuss it with you.
Post Reply
x010
Staff
Posts: 1311
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 4:46 pm
Location: Leaderboard
Contact:

WikiEditor extension?

Post by x010 »

Why don't we use the WikiEditor extension(http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:WikiEditor) in BetaArchive for the wiki?
This extension makes it easier to edit on the wiki.
and/or even the VisualEditor extension(http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:VisualEditor)? I know it is in beta through , but it is like a WYSIWYG editor.
EDIT 1:- The WikiEditor extension appears to be already included , but it is not loaded because the required startup entry is not in the PHP file.

dans34
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1107
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:35 am

Re: WikiEditor extension?

Post by dans34 »

dont bother , nothing ever gets done about the wiki anyway

Maza
Posts: 668
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 7:32 am

Re: WikiEditor extension?

Post by Maza »

dans34 wrote:dont bother , nothing ever gets done about the wiki anyway
The staff did add the cite extension feature.
"We do not view the desktop as a mode, legacy or otherwise."
Windows Vista: Microsoft Speech Center | Windows Vista Saved Search chronicle

dans34
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1107
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:35 am

Re: WikiEditor extension?

Post by dans34 »

and yet havent updated for the last two releases & dont actualy bother to delete unused pages

Maza
Posts: 668
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 7:32 am

Re: WikiEditor extension?

Post by Maza »

dans34 wrote:and yet havent updated for the last two releases & dont actualy bother to delete unused pages
They also have to manage other parts of the site, such as the FTP and forum. I do share your frustration, though.
"We do not view the desktop as a mode, legacy or otherwise."
Windows Vista: Microsoft Speech Center | Windows Vista Saved Search chronicle

Darkstar
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1212
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:29 pm
Location: Southern Germany

Re: WikiEditor extension?

Post by Darkstar »

Seriously, I find all the "visual" editors for Wikis pretty crappy. They work ok for long streaks of regular text, but then again you can do this easily in the edit textbox already.
As soon as you want something only slightly more advanced, like images with special formatting (thumb, frame), tables or templates, they either don't work at all or produce hilariously bad WikiMarkup intermingled with regular HTML.

Wiki markup is not that difficult to learn, and there's tons of resources to be found through Google.
I upload stuff to archive.org from time to time. See here for everything that doesn't fit BA

Maza
Posts: 668
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 7:32 am

Re: WikiEditor extension?

Post by Maza »

Darkstar wrote:Seriously, I find all the "visual" editors for Wikis pretty crappy. They work ok for long streaks of regular text, but then again you can do this easily in the edit textbox already.
As soon as you want something only slightly more advanced, like images with special formatting (thumb, frame), tables or templates, they either don't work at all or produce hilariously bad WikiMarkup intermingled with regular HTML.

Wiki markup is not that difficult to learn, and there's tons of resources to be found through Google.
I wholeheartedly agree. I find that I can contribute much more efficiently with the wiki markup than I can with a "visual editor". I am so used to wiki markup that I occasionally find myself rewriting forum posts because I unintentionally use it to format the post (e.g., '''bold''' instead of bold).
"We do not view the desktop as a mode, legacy or otherwise."
Windows Vista: Microsoft Speech Center | Windows Vista Saved Search chronicle

Post Reply