Newest Microsoft OS checklist (Last modified on 2008/03/15)

Post by **Daniel** » Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:09 pm

Namronia wrote:where youd get all those neptune builds from

I have a list

Post by **Namronia** » Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:14 pm

D.Konieczny wrote:
Namronia wrote:where youd get all those neptune builds from
I have a list

well, could you upload that "list"?

Post by **Daniel** » Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:16 pm

Namronia wrote:
D.Konieczny wrote:
Namronia wrote:where youd get all those neptune builds from
I have a list
well, could you upload that "list"?

I am not sure if I am allowed to, it is a list from the US Army Corps of Engineers...

Post by **Rob Jansen** » Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:50 pm

Why would they have such a list?

Post by **Daniel** » Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:00 pm

DjRob wrote:Why would they have such a list?

The list is titeled as "Government Furnished Software"...

Post by **Namronia** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 12:30 pm

nt 5:

2134
2127
2126
2124
2122
2121
2120
2119
2118
2117
2116
2115
2113
2112
2110
2109
2108
2107
2103
2102
2101
2100
2098
2095
2093
2090
1948
1838
1662
1656
1659
1657
1651
1647
1645
1641
1636
1630
1629
1624
1620
1600
1591
1588
1584
1583
1582
1581
1579
1578
1577
1573
1557
1592
1541
1532
1528
1492
1454
1447
1432
1391 (systray.exe in 1585 of nt 5)

nt 4:

1106
1128
1129
1198
1183
1208
1220
1221
1222
1224
1226
1228
1230
1280
1285
1297
1298
1302
1305
1306
1311

windows 95:

174
258

windows 98 (and 98se):

1714
2000
2016

Post by **Namronia** » Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:53 pm

oh, 5117/5118 cant be neptune or odyssey, first, in the bug report is "NT 5.00" and neptune was 5.50, then, in neptune 5111 the bug report shows build 5112

Post by **Unknown** » Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:07 pm

Namronia wrote:oh, 5117/5118 cant be neptune or odyssey, first, in the bug report is "NT 5.00" and neptune was 5.50, then, in neptune 5111 the bug report shows build 5112

Did it occur to you at any time, that the bug reporting version was 5112
in neptune, and 5118 in whistler.
Just because the bug reporting build is 5118, doesn't necessarily mean
there's a build of neptune thats 5118.
There's welcome exe's in millennium that still say windows 98 for this
reason, the neptune bug report thats 5118 in whistler most likely says
neptune because MS was too lazy to take the neptune name out, just
like the bitmaps and strings in neptune still say windows 2000.
And why post all these build strings from files, it doesn't necessarily
mean there's a build made with that string, just that the file itself was
further worked on, and the build string of the file was moved up one to
reflect it's current string, there's files in neptune whose build string is
5112 because of this.

Post by **Namronia** » Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:17 pm

Unknown wrote:
Namronia wrote:oh, 5117/5118 cant be neptune or odyssey, first, in the bug report is "NT 5.00" and neptune was 5.50, then, in neptune 5111 the bug report shows build 5112
Did it occur to you at any time, that the bug reporting version was 5112
in neptune, and 5118 in whistler.
Just because the bug reporting build is 5118, doesn't necessarily mean
there's a build of neptune thats 5118.
There's welcome exe's in millennium that still say windows 98 for this
reason, the neptune bug report thats 5118 in whistler most likely says
neptune because MS was too lazy to take the neptune name out, just
like the bitmaps and strings in neptune still say windows 2000.
And why post all these build strings from files, it doesn't necessarily
mean there's a build made with that string, just that the file itself was
further worked on, and the build string of the file was moved up one to
reflect it's current string, there's files in neptune whose build string is
5112 because of this.

it was just in the list and i thought it couldnt be and now i posted that, i didnt mean that its like that

(sorry if this sounds rude, it wasnt meant so)

edit..

Creekside is the little known codename for XP Starter Edition, the product that Microsoft sells overseas to developing countries. So, have you guessed yet what these have in common?

so creekside was the codename for xp starter,

source: http://news.zdnet.com/2421-13569_22-152877.html

Post by **Namronia** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:27 pm

4.10.0.997, found in Nashville build (qv.drv), so seems like an early other nashvile build

found in 501 (chicago):

488

Post by **WinPC** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:17 pm

I recently confirmed the existence of Chicago Build 429 when I found a file with the version number "4.00.429" on an old AOpen PC with Windows 95 Build 950 (Retail). This means that Chicago Build 429 actually exists. There are also lot's of Warez FTP lists which are still running to this day where many Memphis Builds can be confirmed.

Post by **tpemail** » Sat Mar 15, 2008 9:45 am

OK, first, sorry for the huge delay but I've got things piled up recently...A bunch of projects are after me:^)
I've made updates till 2007/12/15 for today's list...though it MAY have many bugs and mistakes. Just feel free to point them out if you discover any and I'll fix them in the next release.
Update will continue after my exam's over.

DjRob wrote:Is there a new version coming?
I can integrated it into my book but before i do it, can the maker of this OS Checklist contact me? (because their is no update after 2 months)
Then we can work out if i can integrated into my book or in reverse.

I'm not sure I understand you, but if you feel the need it would be better if you could add my MSN as contacts or Email/PM me for the details if you don't have MSN.

Post by **Namronia** » Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:06 am

tpemail wrote:OK, first, sorry for the huge delay but I've got things piled up recently...A bunch of projects are after me:^)
I've made updates till 2007/12/15 for today's list...though it MAY have many bugs and mistakes. Just feel free to point them out if you discover any and I'll fix them in the next release.
Update will continue after my exam's over.

DjRob wrote:Is there a new version coming?
I can integrated it into my book but before i do it, can the maker of this OS Checklist contact me? (because their is no update after 2 months)
Then we can work out if i can integrated into my book or in reverse.

I'm not sure I understand you, but if you feel the need it would be better if you could add my MSN as contacts or Email/PM me for the details if you don't have MSN.

well, nice work, and as ive saw it i couldnt believe, every site at least one "namronia found..."

but some errors:
longhorn 4039 IS leaked
ive also found 5022 references (neptune) in 2332 of ME

edit: ive also found some nashville 997 build files
and edit again: ive heard that someone (obrasilo and me know him) has nt 3.0 and it has build 102 i think and it was also very unstable

but anyways, well done (since im the most mentioned person there )__ Windows NT 3.1 Beta 2 199?/??/?? 453.2 Note by tpemail: Namronia found this build string in file crtdll.dll from Chicago 58s.

the text is blue, but its not leaked

Post by **Rob Jansen** » Sat Mar 15, 2008 2:16 pm

__ MS-DOS 5.00 RC 10 199?/??/?? N/A Leaked but missing one of the disks.

Namronia released this version on release-a-fortnight.
22-03-1991, are the dates on the first floppy.
This time its complete.

Post by **Rob Jansen** » Sat Mar 15, 2008 2:31 pm

__ Janus 3.10.034e Beta 1 1991/06/?? 34 Currently Incomplete, package contains 6 disks, 2nd disk currently missing and being recreated

D.Konieczny has released this version with second recreated disk.

Post by **Rob Jansen** » Sat Mar 15, 2008 2:45 pm

Whistler builds:

2509
2517
2520
2526
2531
2532
2535
2542

Are avaible from mrpijey server.
There are in the list but need to change from black/pink to .blue

EDIT:
Some more builds in the list that we now have:
2416
2469
2475
2481
2485
2486
2493
2494
2495
2499
2502
2504

Post by **Namronia** » Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:41 am

found in 1351 of memphis:

4.10.0.431, perhaps a nashville build after "83 was branched to nashville"
4.10.0.1044, early 98 beta?
4.10.0.1056, early 98 beta?
4.10.0.1326, early 98 beta?

1387:

4.10.0.1382
windows 2000 build 1413

edit, and those are some keys, we just need to find the versions

Windows 98 Build 1708/Build 1720 - CD-Key: HGBRM-RBK3V-M9FXV-YCXDK-V38J4
Windows 98 Build 1708 - CD-Key: BBH2G-D2VK9-QD4M9-F63XB-43C33
Windows 98 Build 1720 - CD-Key: HGBRM-RBK3V-M9FXV-YCXDK-V38J4
Windows 98 Build 1723 - CD-Key: HGBRM-RBK3V-M9FXV-YCXDK-V38J4

whistler?
5.00.2198.0366 built by: markov at: 000117-1707

some other founds in 3683:
net server:

5.2.3630.0 built by: Lab03_dev(yasuho)
5.2.3631.0 (Lab03_dev(skatari).020509-1043)
5.2.3635 (RTC_XP04 (Lab01_N.020517-1743))
5.2.3646.0 (Lab01_N(portbld).020612-1346)
5.2.3673.0 (Lab01.000424-1359)
5.1.3551.0 (RTC_XP07 (lab01_n(storbuild).010917-1031))
5.1.3555.0 (lab01_n(storbuild).010925-0806)
5.1.3561.0 (lab01_n(storbuild).011003-1326)
5.1.3602.0
5.2.3650.0
5.2.3657.0
5.2.3673.0 (_.020828-1450) (its really that way in the file)

windows xp:

5.1.2232.1
5.1.2437.1 (Lab06_N.010129-0357)
5.1.2448.1
5.1.2482.0 (Lab01_N(ericks).010524-2202)
5.1.2486.0 (main.010602-1927)

some other founds in 5048:

net server:
5.2.3677.0 (ReleasedBinaries.020904-1930)

Post by **Rob Jansen** » Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:45 am

Server 2008 RTM is not insert yet.

6001.18000.x86fre.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840

Vista SP1 has same buildnumber.

6001.18000, the installer says 6.0.6001.17028 but its the RTM one.

Post by **Daniel** » Sun Mar 16, 2008 11:28 pm

Codename Cougar, Windows Small Business Server 2008 Beta 2 Technical Refresh:
6.0.5379.0 (sbs_beta2_tr.080301-0200) (Based on 6001.18000)

Post by **Daniel** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 12:56 am

NT 5.00.1447.1 <= dcomcnfg.exe from Terminal Server SP 6a
NT 5.00.1541.64 <= digsig.dll from Terminal Server SP 6a
NT 5.00.1555.1 <= cryptdlg.dll from Terminal Server SP 6a
NT 5.00.1586.1 <= regsvr32.exe from Terminal Server SP 6a

Hydra Build 4.00.349
Hydra Build 4.00.354

NT 3.50.3609

NT 3.51.1608.0
NT 3.51.3007.0

NT 3.52.1527.4

Post by **Namronia** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:58 am

D.Konieczny wrote:NT 5.00.1447.1 <= dcomcnfg.exe from Terminal Server SP 6a
NT 5.00.1541.64 <= digsig.dll from Terminal Server SP 6a
NT 5.00.1555.1 <= cryptdlg.dll from Terminal Server SP 6a
NT 5.00.1586.1 <= regsvr32.exe from Terminal Server SP 6a

Hydra Build 4.00.349
Hydra Build 4.00.354

NT 3.50.3609

NT 3.51.1608.0
NT 3.51.3007.0

NT 3.52.1527.4

those nt builds are weird.. .where youd get from?

Post by **Daniel** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:45 am

Namronia wrote:
D.Konieczny wrote:NT 5.00.1447.1 <= dcomcnfg.exe from Terminal Server SP 6a
NT 5.00.1541.64 <= digsig.dll from Terminal Server SP 6a
NT 5.00.1555.1 <= cryptdlg.dll from Terminal Server SP 6a
NT 5.00.1586.1 <= regsvr32.exe from Terminal Server SP 6a

Hydra Build 4.00.349
Hydra Build 4.00.354

NT 3.50.3609

NT 3.51.1608.0
NT 3.51.3007.0

NT 3.52.1527.4
those nt builds are weird.. .where youd get from?

NT 4.0 Service Packs

Post by **Namronia** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:26 am

D.Konieczny wrote:
Namronia wrote:
D.Konieczny wrote:NT 5.00.1447.1 <= dcomcnfg.exe from Terminal Server SP 6a
NT 5.00.1541.64 <= digsig.dll from Terminal Server SP 6a
NT 5.00.1555.1 <= cryptdlg.dll from Terminal Server SP 6a
NT 5.00.1586.1 <= regsvr32.exe from Terminal Server SP 6a

Hydra Build 4.00.349
Hydra Build 4.00.354

NT 3.50.3609

NT 3.51.1608.0
NT 3.51.3007.0

NT 3.52.1527.4
those nt builds are weird.. .where youd get from?
NT 4.0 Service Packs

well, sorry but i think that are from different things, not windows nt 3x...
just too high builds...

Post by **Daniel** » Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:07 am

Windows 95 4.00.201
Windows 95 4.00.272
Windows 95 4.00.307
Windows 95 4.00.499

Post by **Namronia** » Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:56 pm

ms dos 3.3c:

found on http://page11.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/n61822636