[REQ] Windows Server 2003 build 3676 corrupt copy

Download requests and offers should be made in this forum.
Do not request a download if you have under 10 posts. You will be ignored.
Forum rules
Please read the following rules before posting a download request in this area:

1. Don't post a request if you have under 10 posts as stated in the rules. If you do anyway, it will be deleted without further notice.
2. Requests for anything against our rules will not be entertained and you will be warned.
3. Check that we don't already have the file on our FTP servers by using the database linked in the navigation.
Post Reply
captainlinux8880
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:11 am
Location: Somewhere on planet Earth.

[REQ] Windows Server 2003 build 3676 corrupt copy

Post by captainlinux8880 »

Hello. On June 12, 2022, a corrupted copy of Windows Server 2003 build 3676 was leaked. Source. Who has the download link? I want to look at the ISO and try to fix it. Thanks.
I am a man. :) :cool:

Windows Thunderstruck
FTP Access
Posts: 497
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2017 2:11 pm

Re: [REQ] Windows Server 2003 build 3676 corrupt copy

Post by Windows Thunderstruck »

he/him, 24, australian
just a user

captainlinux8880
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:11 am
Location: Somewhere on planet Earth.

Re: [REQ] Windows Server 2003 build 3676 corrupt copy

Post by captainlinux8880 »

Can't fix... The kernel is corrupted. The file NTDLL.DLL (kernel) located in I386/System32 is also broken, so this build cannot be repaired. Only text files in ISO survived...
I am a man. :) :cool:

PivotGuy246
FTP Access
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:32 pm
Location: The Void
Contact:

Re: [REQ] Windows Server 2003 build 3676 corrupt copy

Post by PivotGuy246 »

captainlinux8880 wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 12:33 pm
Can't fix... The kernel is corrupted. The file NTDLL.DLL (kernel) located in I386/System32 is also broken, so this build cannot be repaired. Only text files in ISO survived...
The ISO may be thoroughly screwed, but the NT kernel surely isn't given that DRIVER.CAB is almost entirely recoverable:

Image

captainlinux8880
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:11 am
Location: Somewhere on planet Earth.

Re: [REQ] Windows Server 2003 build 3676 corrupt copy

Post by captainlinux8880 »

PivotGuy246 wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 1:11 pm
captainlinux8880 wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 12:33 pm
Can't fix... The kernel is corrupted. The file NTDLL.DLL (kernel) located in I386/System32 is also broken, so this build cannot be repaired. Only text files in ISO survived...
The ISO may be thoroughly screwed, but the NT kernel surely isn't given that DRIVER.CAB is almost entirely recoverable:

Image
DRIVER.CAB is not such an important file, it can be replaced with other versions, and it seems that the system will install normally without it... If someone manages to restore the kernel, then it will be great! :)
I am a man. :) :cool:

PivotGuy246
FTP Access
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:32 pm
Location: The Void
Contact:

Re: [REQ] Windows Server 2003 build 3676 corrupt copy

Post by PivotGuy246 »

captainlinux8880 wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 1:15 pm
DRIVER.CAB is not such an important file, it can be replaced with other versions, and it seems that the system will install normally without it... If someone manages to restore the kernel, then it will be great! :)
You... do realize that DRIVER.CAB does contain the NT kernel, right?

XDude
Donator
Posts: 1528
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 6:40 am

Re: [REQ] Windows Server 2003 build 3676 corrupt copy

Post by XDude »

This is probably the same corrupted copy that sat on an old OSBA member's ftp server around the time it went offline.

captainlinux8880
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:11 am
Location: Somewhere on planet Earth.

Re: [REQ] Windows Server 2003 build 3676 corrupt copy

Post by captainlinux8880 »

XDude wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 1:19 pm
This is probably the same corrupted copy that sat on an old OSBA member's ftp server around the time it went offline.
Maybe :D
I am a man. :) :cool:

captainlinux8880
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:11 am
Location: Somewhere on planet Earth.

Re: [REQ] Windows Server 2003 build 3676 corrupt copy

Post by captainlinux8880 »

PivotGuy246 wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 1:17 pm
captainlinux8880 wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 1:15 pm
DRIVER.CAB is not such an important file, it can be replaced with other versions, and it seems that the system will install normally without it... If someone manages to restore the kernel, then it will be great! :)
You... do realize that DRIVER.CAB does contain the NT kernel, right?
As far as I know, nLite cuts out the DRIVER.CAB in Lite versions, as well as this file can be replaced with other versions, I remember this when I restored the Windows XP build 2600.1078
I am a man. :) :cool:

oscareczek
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 672
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 5:37 pm
Location: Poland

Re: [REQ] Windows Server 2003 build 3676 corrupt copy

Post by oscareczek »

And how is that relevant to DRIVER.CAB containing the copy of NTOSKRNL.EXE?

whistler2442
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 9:41 am

Re: [REQ] Windows Server 2003 build 3676 corrupt copy

Post by whistler2442 »

oscareczek wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 1:57 pm
And how is that relevant to DRIVER.CAB containing the copy of NTOSKRNL.EXE?
Yes. It refers to the file DRIVER.CAB

captainlinux8880
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:11 am
Location: Somewhere on planet Earth.

Re: [REQ] Windows Server 2003 build 3676 corrupt copy

Post by captainlinux8880 »

oscareczek wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 1:57 pm
And how is that relevant to DRIVER.CAB containing the copy of NTOSKRNL.EXE?

in 1078 it is also contained there, lol. however, when replacing DRIVER.CAB from SP1, build 1078 still identifies itself as 1078 and not SP1. Driver.cab just stores drivers...
I am a man. :) :cool:

qazmko1029
FTP Access
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 2:36 am

Re: [REQ] Windows Server 2003 build 3676 corrupt copy

Post by qazmko1029 »

captainlinux8880 wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 2:33 pm
in 1078 it is also contained there, lol. however, when replacing DRIVER.CAB from SP1, build 1078 still identifies itself as 1078 and not SP1. Driver.cab just stores drivers...
With service pack installer integrated, some files wouldn't get updated including driver.cab. This does not happen in official integrated version.

Post Reply