Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Discuss Windows Vista/Server 2008 to Windows 10.
Post Reply

Which build's design do you like more?

Initial blue Longhorn
4
11%
Milestone 7 design
9
26%
Windows XP Bull Edition (6.0.5001)
1
3%
5048 build design
1
3%
Like in 5112 build
5
14%
Like in the final Vista
15
43%
 
Total votes: 35

Dz3n
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:36 pm
Location: Ukraine

Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by Dz3n »

Let's start from the very beginning.

Image
Build 4001 had some sort of desktop backoground, that reminds of aurora, but it's not.


Image
But in build 4017 there was an updated wallpaper, that is actually aurora.


Image
There is a red variant in Milestone 6.


Image
Milestone 7 builds didn't have an aurora background, but as far as I remember there were some aurora controls. You may notice that it was focused on matte gradients.


Image
This is the one of the first post-reset builds. It just had Windows XP design.


Image
Build 5048 introduced a new design, seems to be based on latest pre-reset themes.


Image Image Image
Next builds were focused on glossy smooth gradients.


Image Image Image
And next builds (especially 5284) introduced a new blue-green aurora design that remained to the end.


==============


Both Windows Vista boot screens were incomplete, but Microsoft preferred to use a VGA one. Seems like they continued development in Windows 7:

Image
Windows 7 build 6608 boot screen


Image
Windows 7 build 6730 boot screen


But then they remade it without aurora. Personally I prefer design like in 5112 build.

* screenshots from betawiki
Last edited by Dz3n on Thu May 28, 2020 9:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

tjd2
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:16 pm

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by tjd2 »

I like the one with photoshopped bull on windows xp background lol.

Do you have clean image of it?

Dz3n
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:36 pm
Location: Ukraine

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by Dz3n »

tjd2 wrote:I like the one with photoshopped bull on windows xp background lol.

Do you have clean image of it?
Image Image Image

ColinSlater33
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat May 23, 2020 1:21 am

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by ColinSlater33 »

I kinda look the look of Build 4001. It looks a lot like the final version of Vista in terms of its format but it still uses the visual style of XP.

Kimberly5384
User avatar
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2018 2:07 am
Contact:

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by Kimberly5384 »

I love 5112's design, for sure. Although 5048 also looks pretty.
Legends say if you read this signature, you'll come across good fortune. Lucky you!

LuLu
Permanently Banned
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 5:32 am

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by LuLu »

you missed 5219 one
Image



to me 407x was nicest

Image

too bad theres only a crap low quality vid of it...

BioMarkII
User avatar
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by BioMarkII »

Wasn't this one from M7 (4050)? It is the best variant IMO.
Image

mrfunnylaughs

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by mrfunnylaughs »

I really liked the Aurora effects from both Windows Vista's and 7's development. You should've shown an image of Windows Longhorn build 4074's Aurora effects too!

Voyambar
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 10:12 pm

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by Voyambar »

mrfunnylaughs wrote:I really liked the Aurora effects from both Windows Vista's and 7's development. You should've shown an image of Windows Longhorn build 4074's Aurora effects too!
I do indeed agree with that statement. Its a perfect mix. I would've probably voted for 4074 or maybe one of the other ones with working DWM/DCE.

Now let's talk about Windows 8's cute little avatar thing on the taskbar. That was a nice thing.

YueLing11
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 9:45 am
Location: Asia

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by YueLing11 »

Dz3n wrote:
Image
Windows 7 build 6608 boot screen
It's also present in build 6519

yourepicfailure
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:40 pm
Location: Lufthansa DC-10

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by yourepicfailure »

BioMarkII wrote:Wasn't this one from M7 (4050)? It is the best variant IMO.
Yes, and the xaml to generate it is available.
Image
"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off"
Image
You will never tear me from the grasp of the Pentium M!

BioMarkII
User avatar
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by BioMarkII »

yourepicfailure wrote:
BioMarkII wrote:Wasn't this one from M7 (4050)? It is the best variant IMO.
Yes, and the xaml to generate it is available.
Image
Offtopic Comment
I've had that XAML file ať some point until my old hard drive died. Mind linking it for me?
Sent from my Redmi Note 7 using Tapatalk

Googulator
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 3:46 pm

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by Googulator »

This is the best I could find: http://web.archive.org/web/200606221559 ... Aurora.rar

BTW, the red M6 Aurora wallpaper is clearly a recolored screenshot of this XAML.

BioMarkII
User avatar
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by BioMarkII »

Googulator wrote:This is the best I could find: http://web.archive.org/web/200606221559 ... Aurora.rar

BTW, the red M6 Aurora wallpaper is clearly a recolored screenshot of this XAML.
Thanks for bothering. Unfortunately IE displays an error after opening the XAML. Certainly not because I have Windows 10.

LuLu
Permanently Banned
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 5:32 am

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by LuLu »

you need older version of IE

BioMarkII
User avatar
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by BioMarkII »

LuLu wrote:you need older version of IE
I have tried running it in Vista and XP VM's. I'll have to set up a 2K VM, I guess.

Sent from my Redmi Note 7 using Tapatalk

LuLu
Permanently Banned
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 5:32 am

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by LuLu »

err on XP SP3 IE6 it works just fine

Googulator
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 3:46 pm

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by Googulator »

AFAIK you need to have an unpatched .NET Framework 2.0 installed for it to work, as MS has blocked the ability to render XAML in the browser as a security measure in one of their patches.

Magirus - Deutz
User avatar
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2017 11:01 pm
Location: World

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by Magirus - Deutz »

BioMarkII wrote:
Sat Jun 06, 2020 3:50 pm
LuLu wrote:you need older version of IE
I have tried running it in Vista and XP VM's. I'll have to set up a 2K VM, I guess.

Sent from my Redmi Note 7 using Tapatalk
If you search for "modified longhorn aurora" on Google, then you will find.
Image
The weird man.

The legendary OS is your favorite OS.

BioMarkII
User avatar
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by BioMarkII »

Magirus - Deutz wrote:
Sun Jun 07, 2020 6:43 pm
BioMarkII wrote:
Sat Jun 06, 2020 3:50 pm
LuLu wrote:you need older version of IE
I have tried running it in Vista and XP VM's. I'll have to set up a 2K VM, I guess.

Sent from my Redmi Note 7 using Tapatalk
If you search for "modified longhorn aurora" on Google, then you will find.
Image
Grammercy! Found it.

lucasoak
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2020 8:25 pm

Re: Aurora evolution during Vista development and later

Post by lucasoak »

I like Vista's final build because it's so well polished. But i give my hopes to Longhorn 40xx too, the purple is so pretty.

Post Reply