Debombing Windows Build 9900

Discuss Windows Vista/Server 2008 to Windows 10.
gtgamer468
User avatar
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by gtgamer468 »

I'm currently having issues installing C++ Redistributables. Did anyone have any luck? I was able to add DirectX though.

DragonWars
User avatar
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2018 9:57 am

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by DragonWars »

I didnt found a way to install vcredist 2015 on a beta yet.
You have to somehow force the installation (the os is compatible)

gtgamer468
User avatar
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by gtgamer468 »

That's also the case for mui-based language packs. I was able to install a mlc-based language pack for Windows 8.1 however.

Edit: I was able to install all Visual C++ Redistributables from 2005 all the way up to 2017 using this batch file. Here's the link. Just run the folder as an administrator in CMD and type in "InstallAll"
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rt3p1lvczcoqz ... e.zip?dl=0
Credit goes to Adam Sawicki in the following site: http://asawicki.info/news_1597_installi ... _line.html
Last edited by gtgamer468 on Thu Feb 21, 2019 7:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

yourepicfailure
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:40 pm
Location: Lufthansa DC-10

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by yourepicfailure »

I'm interested in your method of installing language packs.
"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off"
Image
You will never tear me from the grasp of the Pentium M!

gtgamer468
User avatar
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by gtgamer468 »

It's really straightforward actually. Just go here https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/hel ... uage-packs from the official site (windows.com) and download the language packs you need for Windows 8.1. Note that only the languages that can be downloaded in the Download Center can be installed. For example, Japanese is only available from within Control Panel, so this language can't be installed. However, Welsh can be installed as a Download Center link is visible. Just make sure to choose the Windows 8.1 version and then, you simply run the .mlc file after downloading it.

yourepicfailure
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:40 pm
Location: Lufthansa DC-10

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by yourepicfailure »

Oh, that method. I was hoping you had some other method because German is one of those CPanel ones.
But I guess I'll have to backport the pack from my main computer.
"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off"
Image
You will never tear me from the grasp of the Pentium M!

DragonWars
User avatar
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2018 9:57 am

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by DragonWars »

it doesnt seem to install properly
Image

AlphaBeta
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 2439
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2012 4:33 pm
Location: Czechia

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by AlphaBeta »

Adobe docs say that a UCRT update should fix the problem.
AlphaBeta, stop brainwashing me immediately!

Image

gtgamer468
User avatar
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by gtgamer468 »

That update only works on RTM builds, so it's useless. It would give you an error stating that it's not applicable in this build. I tried running PCSX2 (which also requires the same dependencies) and I tried to download all of the missing files, but it gives me the error code 00000007.

jeff69dini
Permanently Banned
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by jeff69dini »

yourepicfailure wrote:Oh, that method. I was hoping you had some other method because German is one of those CPanel ones.
But I guess I'll have to backport the pack from my main computer.
hey sent you a pm, wondering about a debombed client version? thanks :)

yourepicfailure
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:40 pm
Location: Lufthansa DC-10

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by yourepicfailure »

I'm thinking of how the update applies to the system. It most definitely just adds files and changes the registry. If so, theoretically performing a registry change comparison and copying over keys from a 8.1U1 install as well identifying what files were copied and/or how modified may work to get it installed manually. Or someone could automate it with an installer.

Otherwise, I was able to make the classic vcredists up to 2017 installed under 9834.

>jeff69dini
I do not have 9785 client. Ask probably Dragonwars.
"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off"
Image
You will never tear me from the grasp of the Pentium M!

jeff69dini
Permanently Banned
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by jeff69dini »

yourepicfailure wrote:I'm thinking of how the update applies to the system. It most definitely just adds files and changes the registry. If so, theoretically performing a registry change comparison and copying over keys from a 8.1U1 install as well identifying what files were copied and/or how modified may work to get it installed manually. Or someone could automate it with an installer.

Otherwise, I was able to make the classic vcredists up to 2017 installed under 9834.

>jeff69dini
I do not have 9785 client. Ask probably Dragonwars.
ok thanks, sorry man, I thought you were using that version, my bad :|

gp2man
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by gp2man »

Any news about debombing process on this build?
Thanks.

DragonWars
User avatar
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2018 9:57 am

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by DragonWars »

gp2man wrote:Any news about debombing process on this build?
Thanks.
hi,
i have been working on debombing build 9879 (fbl_release) which has the same timebomb mechanism as 9900 fbl_awesome1501
i have spotted what prevents it from running, but i have to look more deeply into it to fix it

if you are interested in win10 betas, try 9785

gtgamer468
User avatar
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by gtgamer468 »

Has anyone been able to install mui-based language packs in this build (9875)?

ernadrey11
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2022 11:22 am

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by ernadrey11 »

Windows 10 Build 9907_fbi_ie timebomb is broken so you can use that build

WayneNathaniel2600
User avatar
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2022 2:14 pm
Location: C:\WINDOWS\LOCALE\Asia\Philippines

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by WayneNathaniel2600 »

AlphaBeta wrote:
Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:53 am
gtgamer468 wrote:The problem with the Server version is that it's featureless for home usage.
Why would you even use a beta build as daily driver?
Because it's way advance than RTM. Let me compare Windows 8.1 versus Windows 10 build 9785.

As of you see Windows 8.1 has no start menu just that full screen start menu. While Build 9785 has the Start menu. It feels like Windows 8.1 but with that Start Menu. This is why i prefer 9785. But sometimes i prefer Windows 8.1.

And also Don't say why would you use a Beta OS because we can use any os we wanted as long it works on our Computers and the drivers are fine
I am A Filipino GoAnimater, YouTube User and a Windows modder. I made my BA Acc to add some missing details
Image

WayneNathaniel2600
User avatar
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2022 2:14 pm
Location: C:\WINDOWS\LOCALE\Asia\Philippines

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by WayneNathaniel2600 »

AlphaBeta wrote:
Thu Feb 14, 2019 2:46 pm
DragonWars wrote:because (most of) windows 10 betas are capable of handling everyday tasks without problems and are way better than rtm(s)
Are they just as secure as RTMs though? No, they're not. This is equivalent to running Windows Vista or Windows XP - you are using an outdated, unpatched system that can be full of security holes that will never be fixed. God bless you and your computers if the WannaCry/NotPetya debacle happens again.
You are wrong, They are actually more secure than RTM.

I actually Prefer Windows 8 build 8045 because it's newer than Windows 7 and more secure than Windows 7. But i can't get it working because of the ACPI error
I am A Filipino GoAnimater, YouTube User and a Windows modder. I made my BA Acc to add some missing details
Image

AlphaBeta
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 2439
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2012 4:33 pm
Location: Czechia

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by AlphaBeta »

Build 8045 is certainly not more secure than properly updated Windows 7, since it literally misses like 10 years of security patches lmfao
AlphaBeta, stop brainwashing me immediately!

Image

Post Reply