BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 10d, 22h, 55m | CPU: 41% | MEM: 2552MB of 8095MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 PostPost subject: Why is Longhorn 3718 so incredibly stable?        Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 5:27 am 
Reply with quote
Offline

Joined
Sun Mar 23, 2014 5:06 pm

Posts
35

Favourite OS
2428
My gosh I can't believe how stable 3718 is... It's probably the most stable build of LH I've ever used. The only thing I don't care for is the stupid C:\ drive "hidden files" bug.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Why is Longhorn 3718 so incredibly stable?        Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 10:10 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:55 pm

Posts
1433
Does that....really make a difference to you at the end of the day? :S

_________________
~


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Why is Longhorn 3718 so incredibly stable?        Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 3:41 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:39 pm

Posts
27

Favourite OS
Whistler 2428 and Longhorn 3718
That is what to expect in a 3xxx build which resembles Windows XP very closely in stability. Even the original PCem will run them fine (albeit slow, but 3718 runs better than 3683). I also heard 4074 is stable but also has an explorer.exe memory leak and higher requirements.

_________________
Just a placeholder signature.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Why is Longhorn 3718 so incredibly stable?        Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:43 pm 
Reply with quote
Offline

Joined
Sun Mar 23, 2014 5:06 pm

Posts
35

Favourite OS
2428
user99672 wrote:
Does that....really make a difference to you at the end of the day? :S


What's your deal? I was just wanting to start a discussion about LH 3718... goodness.

BF10 wrote:
That is what to expect in a 3xxx build which resembles Windows XP very closely in stability. Even the original PCem will run them fine (albeit slow, but 3718 runs better than 3683). I also heard 4074 is stable but also has an explorer.exe memory leak and higher requirements.


4074 is probably the most stable M7 build, for sure. It definitely has some issues (the inability to create new folders; can be easily fixed via a registry hack).

I personally like 3718 the most since it's theme is so pretty to look at and it has that full window transparency. The only cosmetic thing I can't stand is the boot screen is unchanged from XP's, though that's to be expected since they were obviously working on more important stuff.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Why is Longhorn 3718 so incredibly stable?        Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:45 pm 
Reply with quote
Offline

Joined
Mon Dec 12, 2016 5:32 am

Posts
54

Favourite OS
NT 5 & 6
M3 are most stable as they contain less stuff than others...
tho M4 would be stable too if they didn't have that Thumbnail memory leak bug and WinFS mem leak as well


Top  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2017

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS