Chicago 56 Question

[LangsamSpieler]

I can install Chicago 56 sucessfully from Windows 3.1 (from DOS it's not work, because the 2 reqiered folders are missing), but after restart, i see this: i can't open a Window. Is Chicago 56 a fake Version?

[haroldas.velioniskis]

We have huge and beautiful wiki, so WHY you can't you use it? Please, just please stop making a new thread every time you install something, the thing you installed doest't work and you assume it's a fake version.
Regarding your question, 56 is a well known fake build which is a modified version of 58.
topic about 56 https://www.betaarchive.com/wiki/index. ... icago%3A56
list of known fake builds https://www.betaarchive.com/wiki/index. ... ry%3AFakes
by the way, why when something doesn't work straight out of the box you think it's a fake one? Since, you know, it's beta software and you probably are using VMWARE which isn't the best ever thing to run ancient betas.

[whistler2250]

Interesting, because on Winworld, they still have this well known fake. Not sure why it hasn't been reported.

[Overdoze]

Interesting, because on Winworld, they still have this well known fake. Not sure why it hasn't been reported.

Ask them.

[whistler2250]

I already have. SomeGuy (WinWorld's library director), is looking into it.

[DiskingRound]

basically if you do fc/b on all the files of 56 they are identical to 58... the only things that change, naturally, is the network icon, the boot screen, and the build number. Other than that I see nothing different from 58s.