BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 10d, 7h, 31m | CPU: 29% | MEM: 1904MB of 8095MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 PostPost subject: Chicago 56 Question        Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:57 pm 
Reply with quote
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:38 pm

Posts
141

Location
Home

Favourite OS
Windows 95 Chicago 222 Deutsch
I can install Chicago 56 sucessfully from Windows 3.1 (from DOS it's not work, because the 2 reqiered folders are missing), but after restart, i see this: i can't open a Window. Is Chicago 56 a fake Version?

_________________
My Massive Windows 95 Beta memory

Image


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject: Re: Chicago 56 Question        Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:11 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:08 pm

Posts
387

Location
Planet Earth

Favourite OS
OpenNT
We have huge and beautiful wiki, so WHY you can't you use it? Please, just please stop making a new thread every time you install something, the thing you installed doest't work and you assume it's a fake version.
Regarding your question, 56 is a well known fake build which is a modified version of 58.
topic about 56 https://www.betaarchive.com/wiki/index. ... icago%3A56
list of known fake builds https://www.betaarchive.com/wiki/index. ... ry%3AFakes
by the way, why when something doesn't work straight out of the box you think it's a fake one? Since, you know, it's beta software and you probably are using VMWARE which isn't the best ever thing to run ancient betas.

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Chicago 56 Question        Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 6:16 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 09, 2017 1:08 am

Posts
209

Favourite OS
4001
Interesting, because on Winworld, they still have this well known fake. Not sure why it hasn't been reported.

_________________
Pseudo-localized builds are awesome!


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Chicago 56 Question        Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 7:15 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:28 am

Posts
1164

Location
Slovenia

Favourite OS
5111
whistler2250 wrote:
Interesting, because on Winworld, they still have this well known fake. Not sure why it hasn't been reported.


Ask them.

_________________
KRNL386 - A site about retro computing
My MEGA storage for betas and abandonware


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Chicago 56 Question        Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 5:06 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 09, 2017 1:08 am

Posts
209

Favourite OS
4001
I already have. SomeGuy (WinWorld's library director), is looking into it.

_________________
Pseudo-localized builds are awesome!


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Chicago 56 Question        Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:04 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu May 01, 2014 10:26 pm

Posts
1393

Location
Inside the space between . and I

Favourite OS
Nashville 4.00.83
basically if you do fc/b on all the files of 56 they are identical to 58... the only things that change, naturally, is the network icon, the boot screen, and the build number. Other than that I see nothing different from 58s.

_________________
Image
May pop up once in a while. i-B2
Or not


Top  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2017

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS