POSSIBLE LEAK: Windows Neptune 5056

Post by **DJ Deedahx** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 12:14 am

Given the amount of evidence that has been posted in the thread, we can come to MAYBE a final conclusion that this build is fake and has absolutely nothing to offer... except for a minimal build number change.

Objections, LongerHorn?

Post by **LongerHorn** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 12:14 am

DJ Deedahx wrote:Given the amount of evidence that has been posted in the thread, we can come to MAYBE a final conclusion that this build has absolutely nothing to offer... except for a minimal build number change.

Thanks for making our day, LongerHorn.

You don't need to take this out on me, thought I know your just dying to.

Post by **DiskingRound** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 12:17 am

Edit: Removed as this was already pointed out.

Website · Post by **Windows OS** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 12:20 am

DJ Deedahx wrote:Given the amount of evidence that has been posted in the thread, we can come to MAYBE a final conclusion that this build is fake and has absolutely nothing to offer... except for a minimal build number change.

Thanks for making our day, LongerHorn.

Calm down man. Don't blame it on the paperboy, blame the printer.

Post by **DiskingRound** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 12:21 am

Yeah, notice that disk is also from May 1999. That hopefully rules out build 5000 being from June...

Post by **LongerHorn** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 12:24 am

DiskingRound wrote:Yeah, notice that disk is also from May 1999. That hopefully rules out build 5000 being from June...

That's assuming this build is real, which I'd like to believe, but now I'm not so sure.

Post by **AlphaBeta** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 12:24 am

DiskingRound wrote:Yeah, notice that disk is also from May 1999. That hopefully rules out build 5000 being from June...

Uhmmm...? What disc are you talking about?

Post by **yourepicfailure** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 12:25 am

First round of MD5's:

NTOSKRNL.EXE in root-

Kernel32.dll in /system32

0411.csv in 0411.cs_

I'll come up with some more. 4 or 5 more in the cabs, and I'll confirm this build is fake.

Edit: Added by Battler on yourepicfailure's request:
certwiz.ocx in certwiz.oc_

eiccard.inf in eiccard.in_

rpcproxy.dll in rpcproxy.dl_

And the files in cabs match, from 5111 and this iso. Root in this case is i386/

Post by **johnleakedfan** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 12:25 am

AlphaBeta wrote:
DiskingRound wrote:Yeah, notice that disk is also from May 1999. That hopefully rules out build 5000 being from June...
Uhmmm...? What disc are you talking about?

There was a Picture of the Disc that was posted, said May 1999, But not sure where the post went

Post by **lhn555** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 12:27 am

Guys, I don't think we should take it out on LongerHorn if it's fake. You can be upset if it's not real, but I really don't see why we should be mad at him for trying to help out. Don't shoot the messenger.

Post by **Battler** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 12:31 am

I think enough has been said on this topic, and enough evidence provided for fakery.

---> Closed.

Post by **mrpijey** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 1:14 am

We don't blame LongerHorn for this build as he got duped into believing this is real, or his source was. Who got tricked doesn't matter, what matters is that we discovered it's fake and that's it. At the very least I think we should at least be happy that LongerHorn brought it to us so we know in the future when this build surfaces again from the next member.

Good work everyone identifying this properly.

POSSIBLE LEAK: Windows Neptune 5056

Re: POSSIBLE LEAK: Windows Neptune 5056

Re: POSSIBLE LEAK: Windows Neptune 5056

Re: POSSIBLE LEAK: Windows Neptune 5056

Re: POSSIBLE LEAK: Windows Neptune 5056

Re: POSSIBLE LEAK: Windows Neptune 5056

Re: POSSIBLE LEAK: Windows Neptune 5056

Re: POSSIBLE LEAK: Windows Neptune 5056

Re: POSSIBLE LEAK: Windows Neptune 5056

Re: POSSIBLE LEAK: Windows Neptune 5056

Re: POSSIBLE LEAK: Windows Neptune 5056

Re: POSSIBLE LEAK: Windows Neptune 5056

Re: POSSIBLE LEAK: Windows Neptune 5056