Microsoft Odyssey Project - Abandoned, Sorry

Discuss Windows 2000, NT, XP and Windows Server 2000, 2003, SBS 2003.
JakubkoPC
User avatar
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:55 pm

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by JakubkoPC »

Taking 2000 Base.
Changed my lifestyle to more healthy.
Want to contact me? Click the PM button.
Using Chromium.
Image

DarkerJ
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Take a backward step, then a forward step
Contact:

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by DarkerJ »

JakubkoPC wrote:Taking 2000 Base.
Good choice! Now, I can design you startup logos for it. I have a logo for something like a final Neptune, but it can be changed for both Personal and Professional flavors.
<°)))><●▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬●><(((°>
Image
Image
When in doubt...
iddqd
idkfa

voyager8907
Posts: 548
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:31 am
Location: Christchurch, NZ

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by voyager8907 »

JakubkoPC wrote:Taking 2000 Base.
That will make the OS stable.

DarkerJ
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Take a backward step, then a forward step
Contact:

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by DarkerJ »

Image

Image

Heres the logos. I know I said I would base them on the other ones, but I used those for someone else's custom OS, Windows MENTi.
<°)))><●▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬●><(((°>
Image
Image
When in doubt...
iddqd
idkfa

carlaum1
User avatar
Posts: 196
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 10:31 pm

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by carlaum1 »

DarkerJ, make a logo using Windows NT 4.0 Night Background and using Magnavox Odyssey2 logo but without the 2 and with Microsoft written in the late 90s style. It will look very nice, at least for my eyes.

EDIT: Tried to do it myself, this way you can have at least an idea of what to do.
Image
Image
Image Image

JakubkoPC
User avatar
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:55 pm

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by JakubkoPC »

DarkerJ, Your style is good but please make two flavors for professional - 1. Its Odyssey NOT Odyssy
2. Make same as personal but with professional writed.
After this maybe - 1. I additionaly edit it.
2. Place it in the resources as final pics.
Do It With Same Font As Windows Is Writed. Both Pro & Pers
Changed my lifestyle to more healthy.
Want to contact me? Click the PM button.
Using Chromium.
Image

voyager8907
Posts: 548
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:31 am
Location: Christchurch, NZ

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by voyager8907 »

DarkerJ wrote:Image

Image

Heres the logos. I know I said I would base them on the other ones, but I used those for someone else's custom OS, Windows MENTi.
You spelt Odyssey wrong on the Professional logo but overall the logos look great!

DarkerJ
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Take a backward step, then a forward step
Contact:

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by DarkerJ »

JakubkoPC wrote:DarkerJ, Your style is good but please make two flavors for professional - 1. Its Odyssey NOT Odyssy
2. Make same as personal but with professional writed.
After this maybe - 1. I additionaly edit it.
2. Place it in the resources as final pics.
Do It With Same Font As Windows Is Writed. Both Pro & Pers
Image

Image

Arial Black was as close as I could get it.
<°)))><●▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬●><(((°>
Image
Image
When in doubt...
iddqd
idkfa

JakubkoPC
User avatar
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:55 pm

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by JakubkoPC »

Very Good DarkerJ. I will use it as FINAL Pics. You are a :cool: designer
Changed my lifestyle to more healthy.
Want to contact me? Click the PM button.
Using Chromium.
Image

DarkerJ
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Take a backward step, then a forward step
Contact:

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by DarkerJ »

JakubkoPC wrote:Very Good DarkerJ. I will use it as FINAL Pics. You are a :cool: designer
Did you know I do it ONLY with Paint?
<°)))><●▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬●><(((°>
Image
Image
When in doubt...
iddqd
idkfa

JakubkoPC
User avatar
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:55 pm

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by JakubkoPC »

Yes I know it but you picked good font, good logo etc..
I Mind That carlaum1 work is too modern for that OS.
Changed my lifestyle to more healthy.
Want to contact me? Click the PM button.
Using Chromium.
Image

JakubkoPC
User avatar
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:55 pm

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by JakubkoPC »

Please I want some bootscreens. All ideas are welcome!
Changed my lifestyle to more healthy.
Want to contact me? Click the PM button.
Using Chromium.
Image

carlaum1
User avatar
Posts: 196
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 10:31 pm

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by carlaum1 »

JakubkoPC, what do you mean with too modern? I used Windows NT 4.0 logo as base for my work, but that's ok.
Image Image

DarkerJ
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Take a backward step, then a forward step
Contact:

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by DarkerJ »

Image

Image

Note: I cant add many colors. Win2k bootscreens are restricted to 16 colors.
<°)))><●▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬●><(((°>
Image
Image
When in doubt...
iddqd
idkfa

TheCollector1988
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 3604
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 12:11 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by TheCollector1988 »

lol using the Windows 2000 Powered Edition bootscreen.

DarkerJ
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Take a backward step, then a forward step
Contact:

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by DarkerJ »

TheCollector1988 wrote:lol using the Windows 2000 Powered Edition bootscreen.
Its supposed to match with the other logos I made.
<°)))><●▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬●><(((°>
Image
Image
When in doubt...
iddqd
idkfa

voyager8907
Posts: 548
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:31 am
Location: Christchurch, NZ

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by voyager8907 »

TheCollector1988 wrote:lol using the Windows 2000 Powered Edition bootscreen.
Bootscreens look great!
Offtopic Comment
Where can I get Windows Powered?

dans34
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1107
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:35 am

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by dans34 »

voyager8907 wrote:
Offtopic Comment
Where can I get Windows Powered?
Offtopic Comment
A Simple forum search would have found you this

JakubkoPC
User avatar
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:55 pm

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by JakubkoPC »

cralaum1 the NT4 background is OK but the font is modern (Word-Artish).
Changed my lifestyle to more healthy.
Want to contact me? Click the PM button.
Using Chromium.
Image

carlaum1
User avatar
Posts: 196
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 10:31 pm

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by carlaum1 »

JakubkoPC, the logo is actually in late 70s style, Odyssey makes me think in that late 70s Sci-Fi movies, like 2001: A Space Odyssey. That logo makes me travel my head directly to that part of the history.
Image Image

voyager8907
Posts: 548
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:31 am
Location: Christchurch, NZ

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by voyager8907 »

dans34 wrote:
Offtopic Comment
A Simple forum search would have found you this
Offtopic Comment
That didn't get me anywhere.

JakubkoPC
User avatar
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:55 pm

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by JakubkoPC »

Sorry carlaum1 if I made you angry but you can send a idea for boot screen.
In the boot screen will be your font better so try. See tomorrow.
Changed my lifestyle to more healthy.
Want to contact me? Click the PM button.
Using Chromium.
Image

DarkerJ
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Take a backward step, then a forward step
Contact:

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by DarkerJ »

JakubkoPC wrote:Sorry carlaum1 if I made you angry but you can send a idea for boot screen.
In the boot screen will be your font better so try. See tomorrow.
What about mine?
<°)))><●▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬●><(((°>
Image
Image
When in doubt...
iddqd
idkfa

carlaum1
User avatar
Posts: 196
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 10:31 pm

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by carlaum1 »

JakubkoPC, that's ok. By the way, I just made two bootscreens for Odyssey, pick one if you like.
http://www.betaarchive.com/imageupload/ ... .84827.png
http://www.betaarchive.com/imageupload/ ... .79285.png
Thanks to linuxlove for the NT wallpaper. I didn't use Magnavox Odyssey 2 logo this time because it looked horrible in 16 colors. Since Whistler didn't have different bootscreens for Professional and Personal, I didn't made bootscreens for each edition. Staying close to Whistler is the best way to get something closer of what Odyssey was.
Image Image

voyager8907
Posts: 548
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:31 am
Location: Christchurch, NZ

Re: What about NT 5 Build 1906 and Windows 2000 Build 1946?

Post by voyager8907 »

carlaum1 wrote:JakubkoPC, that's ok. By the way, I just made two bootscreens for Odyssey, pick one if you like.
http://www.betaarchive.com/imageupload/ ... .84827.png
http://www.betaarchive.com/imageupload/ ... .79285.png
Thanks to linuxlove for the NT wallpaper. I didn't use Magnavox Odyssey 2 logo this time because it looked horrible in 16 colors. Since Whistler didn't have different bootscreens for Professional and Personal, I didn't made bootscreens for each edition. Staying close to Whistler is the best way to get something closer of what Odyssey was.
Look good but I'm going to have to go with DarkerJ's bootscreens.

Locked