Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 build 1069

Discuss Windows 2000, NT, XP and Windows Server 2000, 2003, SBS 2003.
Post Reply
beanboy89
User avatar
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:29 am
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 build 1069

Post by beanboy89 »

After seeing this post about MSDNAA servers, I decided to do some digging around the server listed in the thread, and I found a Checked Debug beta build of Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 build 1069 (EN_Windows_2003_Server_Ent_64bit_AMD_ChkDbg.sdc).

When it first got to the graphical version of the setup, I decided to check winver, and I saw that the Server 2003 banner had a crudely-MS Painted "AMD 64" written in it.

Image

Has anyone seen this build before, and does anyone have a serial number for it?

Thanks.

lucas93
Posts: 913
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:34 am

Re: Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 build 1069

Post by lucas93 »

I don't know much about Server 2003 betas, but 1069 sounds way too low to be a Server 2003 beta.
Builds around 1000 were NT 3.51 betas.

Like I said, I don't know much about Server 2003, so I'm probably wrong.

Skynet
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:32 pm
Contact:

Re: Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 build 1069

Post by Skynet »

lucas93 wrote:I don't know much about Server 2003 betas, but 1069 sounds way too low to be a Server 2003 beta.
Builds around 1000 were NT 3.51 betas.

Like I said, I don't know much about Server 2003, so I'm probably wrong.
1069 for a SP beta isn't that low - after all, the last leaked version of Win7 SP1 is build 153 iirc.
It's actually 3790 SP1 v1069, not Server 2003 SP1 build 1069, just as Win7 SP1 is 7601 SP1 v153.
Not here.

lucas93
Posts: 913
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:34 am

Re: Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 build 1069

Post by lucas93 »

Skynet wrote:
lucas93 wrote:I don't know much about Server 2003 betas, but 1069 sounds way too low to be a Server 2003 beta.
Builds around 1000 were NT 3.51 betas.

Like I said, I don't know much about Server 2003, so I'm probably wrong.
1069 for a SP beta isn't that low - after all, the last leaked version of Win7 SP1 is build 153 iirc.
It's actually 3790 SP1 v1069, not Server 2003 SP1 build 1069, just as Win7 SP1 is 7601 SP1 v153.
Ahh I see.

beanboy89
User avatar
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:29 am
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 build 1069

Post by beanboy89 »

Skynet wrote:
lucas93 wrote:I don't know much about Server 2003 betas, but 1069 sounds way too low to be a Server 2003 beta.
Builds around 1000 were NT 3.51 betas.

Like I said, I don't know much about Server 2003, so I'm probably wrong.
1069 for a SP beta isn't that low - after all, the last leaked version of Win7 SP1 is build 153 iirc.
It's actually 3790 SP1 v1069, not Server 2003 SP1 build 1069, just as Win7 SP1 is 7601 SP1 v153.
Correct. NT 5.2 SP1 actually had a fairly long release cycle. Build 1069 was compiled on September 5, 2003, while build 1830 (RTM) was compiled on March 24, 2005 (ironically exactly two years after Server 2003 RTMed).

beanboy89
User avatar
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:29 am
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 build 1069

Post by beanboy89 »

Anyone know of a serial number for this build? I've tried serials from other XP/2003 x64 betas and Server 2003 betas, but none seem to work. I really want to further test this build beyond the preinstallation environment.

Thanks.

Daniel
User avatar
Posts: 2607
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Germany, Earth
Contact:

Re: Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 build 1069

Post by Daniel »

Try CKY24-Q8QRH-X3KMR-C6BCY-T847Y

beanboy89
User avatar
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:29 am
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 build 1069

Post by beanboy89 »

Daniel wrote:Try CKY24-Q8QRH-X3KMR-C6BCY-T847Y
Awesome, the key worked. Thanks!

Image

Edit: I've run into a problem, I can't seem to install VMWare Tools. "Setup was unable to upgrade the Windows Installer."

neo
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:10 pm

Re: Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 build 1069

Post by neo »

Try updating the windows installer manually.

beanboy89
User avatar
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:29 am
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 build 1069

Post by beanboy89 »

neo wrote:Try updating the windows installer manually.
I've just tried that, and apparently there are different versions of Windows Installer for checked/debug and free versions of Windows.

Image

neo
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:10 pm

Re: Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 build 1069

Post by neo »

Use /x on the installer package to extract it. Then try manually replacing the files.

CountryKING
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:26 am

Re: Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 build 1069

Post by CountryKING »

beanboy89 wrote:
neo wrote:Try updating the windows installer manually.
I've just tried that, and apparently there are different versions of Windows Installer for checked/debug and free versions of Windows.

Have you tried this: Installing Windows Installer on Checked Builds of Windows

beanboy89
User avatar
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:29 am
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 build 1069

Post by beanboy89 »

neo wrote: Use /x on the installer package to extract it. Then try manually replacing the files.
I'll try that, and report back if it works.
CountryKING wrote: Have you tried this: Installing Windows Installer on Checked Builds of Windows
I tried that, and unfortunately it didn't work.

Post Reply