Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Book

Discussion of beta and abandonware topics not fit for the other forums goes here.
linuxlove
Donator
Posts: 5901
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:56 am

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by linuxlove »

zeehonden_3 wrote:Aah too bad I saw these links too late . I hope they will be uploaded to another server very fast.

Anyway, thanks so much for sharing Darkstar!
I uploaded all of them to the BA server.
Goodbye.

zeehonden_3
User avatar
Posts: 682
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:46 pm

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by zeehonden_3 »

OK thanks a lot! Hope mrpijey will be fast (not to hurry you, I'm just really interested)
Image

angelwolf71885
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 900
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by angelwolf71885 »

wow thats a hell of a lucky find did you get them for free? i mean he was throwing them out after all
Image

Kenneth
Donator
Posts: 2407
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:42 am

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by Kenneth »

Image

Full NT Cairo. This is OFS Windows Cairo, not some other sort of thing.

Vista custo
Posts: 257
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by Vista custo »

"Windows 95" just magically appeared on start menu along too eh?

Darkstar
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1213
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:29 pm
Location: Southern Germany

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by Darkstar »

Hi,

skfunnyboy fixed the broken ARJ archive in this build:
http://cornelia.regengedanken.de/~mdrue ... T1227S.rar (this time without password)

Actually, it's not fixed, just all other (intact) files repacked. The only missing (i.e. broken) file is SOUND36.WAV which can be taken from another NT4 server build (the WAV files didn't change much between the builds I guess) to get a working and complete version.

Thanks skfunnyboy!

I have found some other betas (MS Visual Basic, MSIE2.0, MS Commerce Server, MS Connection Point Services, MS Exchange Server, and some non-MS software) and some ALPHA (even MIPS/PPC) software from MS, although most of that is pretty unspectacular (SDKs, System Management Server, stuff like that) although I do have Excel5 for ALPHA if there's any interest in that.

-Darkstar
I upload stuff to archive.org from time to time. See here for everything that doesn't fit BA

linuxlove
Donator
Posts: 5901
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:56 am

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by linuxlove »

Any beta you have will be much welcome.
And there are some Non-X86 users here too that I think would be happy to get more software for their platform.

And hey, you have 10 posts! Go see if you can get FTP access now
Goodbye.

Daniel
User avatar
Posts: 2607
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Germany, Earth
Contact:

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by Daniel »

Could you re-upload all the files Darkstar?

Kenneth
Donator
Posts: 2407
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:42 am

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by Kenneth »

Vista custo wrote:"Windows 95" just magically appeared on start menu along too eh?
Yeah, appears to be called the 'Chicago Shell and User Update' too...

trustBA
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1206
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:30 am
Location: In the Floating island above the sky
Contact:

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by trustBA »

OK Darkstar, can you re-upload the Windows 95 SDK beta2, PC-DOS 7.0 final beta, and PC-DOS 7.0 beta?
Kenneth wrote:Image

Full NT Cairo. This is OFS Windows Cairo, not some other sort of thing.
What is OFS?
Online periodically.
---
M$ Software Labels | OS Tester | Software Geek | Creative Agent!

Last edited by trustBA on Mon, 3rd Nov, 2013 6:99 am, edited 100 times in total.

Random_User
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1222
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:48 am

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by Random_User »

trustBA wrote:OK Darkstar, can you re-upload the Windows 95 SDK beta2, PC-DOS 7.0 final beta, and PC-DOS 7.0 beta?
Kenneth wrote:Image

Full NT Cairo. This is OFS Windows Cairo, not some other sort of thing.
What is OFS?
OFS is short for Object-Oriented File System. It's a prototype of a file system with support for structured and unstructured data, which Microsoft intended to include as a feature in Cairo before it was cancelled.

skfunnyboy
User avatar
Posts: 356
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:56 am
Location: Quebec,Canada

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by skfunnyboy »

DarkStar: No problem

For the other want these build, its avaliable in the http://winbetalounge.co.cc FTP

Skfunnyboy

Random_User
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1222
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:48 am

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by Random_User »

skfunnyboy wrote:DarkStar: No problem

For the other want these build, its avaliable in the http://winbetalounge.co.cc FTP

Skfunnyboy
According to Betacollector21, the WinBetaLounge FTP Server is empty.

skfunnyboy
User avatar
Posts: 356
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:56 am
Location: Quebec,Canada

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by skfunnyboy »

Random_User wrote:
skfunnyboy wrote:DarkStar: No problem

For the other want these build, its avaliable in the http://winbetalounge.co.cc FTP

Skfunnyboy
According to Betacollector21, the WinBetaLounge FTP Server is empty.
1.: I am the Owner, BC21 is the Co-Owner
and 2 : now he not empty

trustBA
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1206
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:30 am
Location: In the Floating island above the sky
Contact:

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by trustBA »

The first phase installation of Windows NT 3.5 Build 854 on VPC 2004 is completed, however:

1. I deleted the RDR.SYS file because of Trojan.
2. I don't know how to patch the installation files (INTITAL.INF and SETUP.INF) to work for Pentium II or later processors.

Here is the result:

Image

Can you show me a fix (because copying the patched installer files from 807 build leads to the error)?
Online periodically.
---
M$ Software Labels | OS Tester | Software Geek | Creative Agent!

Last edited by trustBA on Mon, 3rd Nov, 2013 6:99 am, edited 100 times in total.

skfunnyboy
User avatar
Posts: 356
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:56 am
Location: Quebec,Canada

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by skfunnyboy »

Really dont know ..
I know that the file RDR.SYS is a virus .. why.. i dont know.. but i dont have time to mess with this so!

angelwolf71885
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 900
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by angelwolf71885 »

trustBA wrote:The first phase installation of Windows NT 3.5 Build 854 on VPC 2004 is completed, however:

1. I deleted the RDR.SYS file because of Trojan.
2. I don't know how to patch the installation files (INTITAL.INF and SETUP.INF) to work for Pentium II or later processors.

Here is the result:

Image

Can you show me a fix (because copying the patched installer files from 807 build leads to the error)?
unless mcafee or norton say its a virus then its NOT a virus
Image

skfunnyboy
User avatar
Posts: 356
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:56 am
Location: Quebec,Canada

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by skfunnyboy »

angelwolf71885 wrote:
trustBA wrote:The first phase installation of Windows NT 3.5 Build 854 on VPC 2004 is completed, however:

1. I deleted the RDR.SYS file because of Trojan.
2. I don't know how to patch the installation files (INTITAL.INF and SETUP.INF) to work for Pentium II or later processors.

Here is the result:

Image

Can you show me a fix (because copying the patched installer files from 807 build leads to the error)?
unless mcafee or norton say its a virus then its NOT a virus
My Avira detected it

angelwolf71885
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 900
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by angelwolf71885 »

did you look that virus up? if it comes up with no info found its a false posative
Image

betascollector
Donator
Posts: 1071
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:06 am
Location: C:\WINDOWS\System32

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by betascollector »

skfunnyboy wrote:
angelwolf71885 wrote:
trustBA wrote:The first phase installation of Windows NT 3.5 Build 854 on VPC 2004 is completed, however:

1. I deleted the RDR.SYS file because of Trojan.
2. I don't know how to patch the installation files (INTITAL.INF and SETUP.INF) to work for Pentium II or later processors.

Here is the result:

snip

Can you show me a fix (because copying the patched installer files from 807 build leads to the error)?
unless mcafee or norton say its a virus then its NOT a virus
My Avira detected it
My AVG on my laptop says its virus but says is not a virus. Safe!

skfunnyboy
User avatar
Posts: 356
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:56 am
Location: Quebec,Canada

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by skfunnyboy »

anyway, he on WinBetaLounge ftp if you want it !

ultrawindows
Donator
Posts: 1627
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:30 pm

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by ultrawindows »

@trustBA,
1. Boot with an Windows 95 bootdisk
2. Use FDISK to create a partition
3. Reboot
4. Format the partition with: A:\>Format C: /u /s
5. Now make a dir on C:\ using the command C:\>md i386
6. Copy all files to this dir from the R:\i386 drive: C:\>copy R:\i386\*.* C:\i386
7. If it fails on banana.an_ (banana.ani -> CD-Rom Driver), shutdown the VM, open the harddrive image and just copy the i386 folder into the root of the drive
8. Reboot computer without bootdisk
9. At C:\> type: cd i386
10. Then use C:\i386>WINNT.EXE
You must create the boot floppy's, otherwise it will not boot (at 3.1)
11. Reboot the machine when setup asks for it
12. Now the 2nd fase of text-setup loads and go through it normally and reboot
13. When the machine reboots, shut it down and open the harddrive image file
14. Copy initial.inf & setup.inf from \winnt\system32 to your harddrive.
15. Open the 2 files and replace the following line STF_PROCESSOR = I586 in both files in an plain text editor (notepad adds some characters, use wordpad or notepad++).
16. Replace the 2 files in these 2 locations: %systemdrive%\windows\system32 and %systemdrive%\$win_nt$.~ls
17. Now save the harddrive image file and then boot the machine again and go through the GUI stage of the setup as normal
From Rob's MCB

betaluva
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 2068
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:21 am
Location: Australia

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by betaluva »

ultrawindows wrote:@trustBA,
1. Boot with an Windows 95 bootdisk
2. Use FDISK to create a partition
3. Reboot
4. Format the partition with: A:\>Format C: /u /s
5. Now make a dir on C:\ using the command C:\>md i386
6. Copy all files to this dir from the R:\i386 drive: C:\>copy R:\i386\*.* C:\i386
7. If it fails on banana.an_ (banana.ani -> CD-Rom Driver), shutdown the VM, open the harddrive image and just copy the i386 folder into the root of the drive
8. Reboot computer without bootdisk
9. At C:\> type: cd i386
10. Then use C:\i386>WINNT.EXE
You must create the boot floppy's, otherwise it will not boot (at 3.1)
11. Reboot the machine when setup asks for it
12. Now the 2nd fase of text-setup loads and go through it normally and reboot
13. When the machine reboots, shut it down and open the harddrive image file
14. Copy initial.inf & setup.inf from \winnt\system32 to your harddrive.
15. Open the 2 files and replace the following line STF_PROCESSOR = I586 in both files in an plain text editor (notepad adds some characters, use wordpad or notepad++).
16. Replace the 2 files in these 2 locations: %systemdrive%\windows\system32 and %systemdrive%\$win_nt$.~ls
17. Now save the harddrive image file and then boot the machine again and go through the GUI stage of the setup as normal
From Rob's MCB

what do you do if you dont have any medium density disks?

* if i read the initial.inf in the i386 folder correctly then this build supports Alpha,Mips and PowerPc as well as x86?
Last edited by betaluva on Sun May 16, 2010 9:29 am, edited 2 times in total.
Never Fear,Captain Sweatpants is Here!
*http://osbetaworld.b1.jcink.com/*

Pwned
Donator
Posts: 4268
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:28 pm

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by Pwned »

betaluva wrote:
ultrawindows wrote:@trustBA,
snippage
From Rob's MCB

what do you do if you dont have any medium density disks?
Boot from WinPE (http://www.nu2.nu/pebuilder/).

betaluva
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 2068
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:21 am
Location: Australia

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by betaluva »

no, i mean ,can you skip creating the 3 boot floppies? when i try i get the "this is not a medium density disk" message
Never Fear,Captain Sweatpants is Here!
*http://osbetaworld.b1.jcink.com/*

Post Reply