Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Book

Discussion of beta and abandonware topics not fit for the other forums goes here.
The Distractor

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by The Distractor »

linuxlove: remember the NTOSKRNL.EXE in NT 3.5 RTM had a different build number to what was shown when installed..

Darkstar
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1213
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:29 pm
Location: Southern Germany

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by Darkstar »

The Distractor wrote:Darkstar: is there anything else OS-wise ?
Restoring these tapes takes some time, and since I do the tapes chronologically I'm still somewhere in 1995/1996 so there are no Win98 betas yet

I have "NetWare 4.1 final beta" and a few OS/2 Warp3 builds ("General Availability", "Gamma", "Gamma with WinOS2") and a few non-beta OS's (OS/2 Warp3, GeoWorks 2.0, Novell DOS 7, SCO UnixServer 3 and various builds of TSX-32, which was a DOS-based, DOS-compatible multitasking text mode operating system)

I'll keep you posted on any other betas I find, although it might take a few days/weeks
linuxlove wrote:While I've been downloading, I've also been checking NTOSKRNL.EXE on the downloaded NT builds. So far they all seem to be legit, though NT35_845.rar seems to be mislabeled, NTOSKRNL.EXE has a build of 851.
Build 851 is not in the Collection Book either

-Darkstar
I upload stuff to archive.org from time to time. See here for everything that doesn't fit BA

linuxlove
Donator
Posts: 5901
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:56 am

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by linuxlove »

Really, anything you can give us will be appreciated here. This is BetaArchive after all so keep up the work and I hope you don't wear out that 386 just for our cause.
Goodbye.


Darkstar
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1213
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:29 pm
Location: Southern Germany

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by Darkstar »

Pwned wrote:I just installed NT4 1141:
Wow, that was fast
Is it possible to convert the file system to NTFS if you install from DOS? Or do you run it on FAT?

-Darkstar
I upload stuff to archive.org from time to time. See here for everything that doesn't fit BA

Pwned
Donator
Posts: 4268
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:28 pm

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by Pwned »

Darkstar wrote:
Pwned wrote:I just installed NT4 1141:
Wow, that was fast
Is it possible to convert the file system to NTFS if you install from DOS? Or do you run it on FAT?

-Darkstar
I didn't install this for everyday use, so, there were problems with NTFS and I choose FAT. It is not so important, what FileSystem I will use.
Yeah, 1175:
Image
Explorer hung, and I can't do anything with that!
Last edited by Pwned on Fri May 14, 2010 11:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

lucas93
Posts: 913
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:34 am

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by lucas93 »

I vote Darkstar for BA FTP access

Darkstar, if you don't mind me asking, where did you get those tapes from?

Darkstar
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1213
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:29 pm
Location: Southern Germany

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by Darkstar »

lucas93 wrote:Darkstar, if you don't mind me asking, where did you get those tapes from?
I got the tapes from someone I know, who found them in his basement and was about to throw them out when he moved houses.

He said that, back in the 90's, you could get these tapes from the sysops of some well-known BBS's, as a weekly or monthly subscription service. He didn't remember the details but said that he got them from sweden or so, for what was like 30 or 40 euro/month. I don't need to mention that this was highly illegal even back then, although most of the stuff has faded into obscurity by now so probably nobody really cares anymore.

There's some *very* obscure stuff on these tapes, like MS Office applications for Alpha and the like. Too bad I didn't succeed in installing NT4 on my AlphaStation yet, otherwise I would have a pretty usable installation there now

Too bad that some of the files are now (or probably have always been) slightly broken, i.e. CRC errors on extract, although the backup software didn't report any errors.

Here's a sad example:
http://cornelia.regengedanken.de/~mdrue ... broken.rar
This is probably another unknown beta release, however, one of the zip files is corrupted. Maybe someone wants to create a "cannibalized" version of it by using the missing bits from a slightly different build? Or maybe someone who knows ihs way around the zip compression can even fix the archive somehow, it's probably just a few bits that have flipped (or a few bytes). Brute-force archive repair, anyone?

Oh, and if someone wants to take a look at this, the version info on the kernel says it's 1025 but the only known release of NT3.51 should be 1057. Is this also a case of the differing build numbers in kernel and winver?
http://cornelia.regengedanken.de/~mdrue ... german.rar
If it's not yet known I also have the english version here

-Darkstar
I upload stuff to archive.org from time to time. See here for everything that doesn't fit BA

lucas93
Posts: 913
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:34 am

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by lucas93 »

lol, best way to collect something. Get it, put it in a safe spot and come back 15 years later when it's super rare

Thanks for taking the time to restore these Darkstar

betascollector
Donator
Posts: 1071
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:06 am
Location: C:\WINDOWS\System32

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by betascollector »

I downloaded PC-DOS 7.0 Final Beta, PC-DOS 7.0 Beta and I still downloaded Chicago Build 275.
How to extract TD0,DSK and XDF files?

linuxlove
Donator
Posts: 5901
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:56 am

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by linuxlove »

I'll get all the new releases uploaded sometime tonight. When there's daylight outside, I can't upload anything since something will be going on while it's still daylight. Night, however is free game so I'll be back tomorrow and let you all know if it uploaded properly.
Goodbye.

Darkstar
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1213
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:29 pm
Location: Southern Germany

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by Darkstar »

betascollector wrote:I downloaded PC-DOS 7.0 Final Beta, PC-DOS 7.0 Beta and I still downloaded Chicago Build 275.
How to extract TD0,DSK and XDF files?
For TD0 files there's the TELEDISK.EXE executable that can write it back to a physical floppy disk (or image file if you're in VMWare etc.)
The 1.8meg images must be copied with xdfcopy
DSKs can be written with loaddskf.exe

It's all in there. Note that I'm not responsible this, these files are as-is from the scene releases.

-Darkstar
I upload stuff to archive.org from time to time. See here for everything that doesn't fit BA

betascollector
Donator
Posts: 1071
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:06 am
Location: C:\WINDOWS\System32

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by betascollector »

Warning: If you are installing Chicago Build 275 in VMWare, Remember to disable the ethernet.
EDIT: And if you installing Chicago Build 216 in VMWare, Disable Audio card.
Because it will cause Windows Protection Error. (maybe based on Nashville Build 999?)
Last edited by betascollector on Sat May 15, 2010 4:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

lucas93
Posts: 913
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:34 am

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by lucas93 »

Why's that?

Jecag
Posts: 430
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 1:59 am
Location: Virginia, North America

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by Jecag »

Hi, I noticed DarkStar's stuff and decided to join this site

Anyways, I downloaded his "Broken Beta", all the Zip Archives decompressed without an issue (I'm on a Mac). The ARJs decompress to a certain point, but it gets stuck at AUTOCHK.EXE

Is there any specific tool you recommend DarkStar on decompressing the ARJs.

If I do get it fully uncompressed, I would share it with everyone here. And DarkStar, thanks for leaking your betas.
Last edited by Jecag on Sat May 15, 2010 3:59 am, edited 2 times in total.

WinPC

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by WinPC »

Thanks for these builds! Finally, I have something to add to my internal server, I just turned it on (I only need to turn it on and off as I use it and it connects to the network automatically since that's how it's configured), and I'm now going to add these builds to it, despite how late it is where I am. I'll make sure to test at least some of them tomorrow.

Anyway, do you have any early Chicago builds, especially those in the 3x-4x build series? I've been looking for them for over three years now, since late 2006, but have never been able to find copies of them.

But anyway, thanks for sharing!
Last edited by WinPC on Sat Oct 27, 2012 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

betaluva
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 2068
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:21 am
Location: Australia

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by betaluva »

THANKS for sharing Darkstar, especially seeing you had to go to all that work to get the data from those crusty old DAT tapes.
Last edited by betaluva on Tue May 18, 2010 3:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
Never Fear,Captain Sweatpants is Here!
*http://osbetaworld.b1.jcink.com/*

jimmsta
Donator
Posts: 823
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:43 am
Contact:

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by jimmsta »

Jecag wrote:Hi, I noticed DarkStar's stuff and decided to join this site

Anyways, I downloaded his "Broken Beta", all the Zip Archives decompressed without an issue (I'm on a Mac). The ARJs decompress to a certain point, but it gets stuck at AUTOCHK.EXE

Is there any specific tool you recommend DarkStar on decompressing the ARJs.

If I do get it fully uncompressed, I would share it with everyone here. And DarkStar, thanks for leaking your betas.
I'm also on a mac, and used MacPorts' unarj port to decompress the archives. I've gone ahead and repacked the extracted archive here: http://cid-201d867119a80ed3.skydrive.li ... -fixed.rar
16 years of BA experience; I refurbish old electronics, and archive diskettes with a KryoFlux. My posting history is 16 years of educated speculation and autism.

trustBA
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1206
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:30 am
Location: In the Floating island above the sky
Contact:

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by trustBA »

Careful when downloading NT 3.5 build 854, there is a trojan TR/Dropper.Gen in the file called RDR.sys (NT Lan Manager Redirector File System Driver).
Online periodically.
---
M$ Software Labels | OS Tester | Software Geek | Creative Agent!

Last edited by trustBA on Mon, 3rd Nov, 2013 6:99 am, edited 100 times in total.

ultrawindows
Donator
Posts: 1627
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:30 pm

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by ultrawindows »

http://cornelia.regengedanken.de/~mdrue ... 5beta1.rar
=
Readmy: Notes On Using the Shell Technology Preview with Windows NT version 3.51
Build: 3.51.1053.1

The Distractor

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by The Distractor »

yeah, that's just newshell.

GL1zdA
User avatar
Posts: 515
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:32 pm
Location: Warsaw, PL

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by GL1zdA »

Darkstar wrote:There's some *very* obscure stuff on these tapes, like MS Office applications for Alpha and the like. Too bad I didn't succeed in installing NT4 on my AlphaStation yet, otherwise I would have a pretty usable installation there now
It would be great, if you would upload some Alpha stuff (Is it Office 97 (Word 97/Excel 97 actually) or maybe you have the 4.2 for NT version everyone is looking for?). There are at least a few AlphaNT users on this forum.
Image

Darkstar
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1213
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:29 pm
Location: Southern Germany

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by Darkstar »

I had to temporarily remove the downloads from the server. I hope everyone who wanted already got them. If not, I can provide new links again later.

I'll look into the alpha apps tonight

-Darkstar
I upload stuff to archive.org from time to time. See here for everything that doesn't fit BA

zeehonden_3
User avatar
Posts: 682
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:46 pm

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by zeehonden_3 »

Aah too bad I saw these links too late . I hope they will be uploaded to another server very fast.

Anyway, thanks so much for sharing Darkstar!
Image

trustBA
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1206
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:30 am
Location: In the Floating island above the sky
Contact:

Re: Windows beta builds that are NOT in the MS Collection Bo

Post by trustBA »

OK, I've installed Windows 95 build 216 on VPC 2004 SP1 and works very perfectly (with Sound). Some notes:

1. missing file after installation, a single .vxd are not added to the autoexec.bat or config.sys
2. Hangs in the 2nd phase of installation. Restarting works just fine.

Screenshots:

Image
Image
Image
Image

Look at the System Properties, it's real build, not fake.
Online periodically.
---
M$ Software Labels | OS Tester | Software Geek | Creative Agent!

Last edited by trustBA on Mon, 3rd Nov, 2013 6:99 am, edited 100 times in total.

Post Reply