vista build 5270
Re: vista build 5270
Yeah, it was the December 2005 CTP I believe and it's on the BA FTP. Unless I'm totally mistaken.
-
ultrawindows
- Donator
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:30 pm
Re: vista build 5270
Microsoft Windows Vista (''Longhorn'' 6.0.5270.9) (beta2).rar
Microsoft Windows Vista (''Longhorn'' 6.0.5270.9) (x64 beta2).rar
On the BA FTP .
Microsoft Windows Vista (''Longhorn'' 6.0.5270.9) (x64 beta2).rar
On the BA FTP .
Re: vista build 5270
i have
Name Microsoft Windows Vista (''Longhorn'' 6.0.5270.9) (beta2)
Size 1.97 GB (2,123,573,248 bytes)
which is same as i have in size, & i checked that build is wrong named, is actually longhorn server 5270.
proof:: http://www.sendspace.com/file/md1euh
Microsoft Windows Vista (''Longhorn'' 6.0.5270.9) (x64 beta2)
size 2.46 GB (2,649,262,080 bytes)
is also same in size but not yet checked
& as i remember both was downloaded from BA
Name Microsoft Windows Vista (''Longhorn'' 6.0.5270.9) (beta2)
Size 1.97 GB (2,123,573,248 bytes)
which is same as i have in size, & i checked that build is wrong named, is actually longhorn server 5270.
proof:: http://www.sendspace.com/file/md1euh
Microsoft Windows Vista (''Longhorn'' 6.0.5270.9) (x64 beta2)
size 2.46 GB (2,649,262,080 bytes)
is also same in size but not yet checked
& as i remember both was downloaded from BA
jaidev66
- Rob Jansen
- Donator
- Posts: 5271
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 1:05 pm
- Location: The Collection Book
- Contact:
Re: vista build 5270
Re: vista build 5270
I do not get it, this is offtopic, but what is the point of the 64-bit version? sure it uses.... more bits.... but lets be honest, it doest improve your experience at all, it doesn't looks any nicer (Witch it should )
Re: vista build 5270
Haven't you heard 64-bit support more than 4GB installed RAM? Plus, why does 64-bit need to looks nicer than 32-bit? Because of the extra "bits"?Gmod1001 wrote:I do not get it, this is offtopic, but what is the point of the 64-bit version? sure it uses.... more bits.... but lets be honest, it doest improve your experience at all, it doesn't looks any nicer (Witch it should )
- David Nucrdale
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:42 am
Re: vista build 5270
Well, I guess he thinks x64 = more color depth, but surely, that isnt it. Its about the processor and so on, not the GPU.FarCry3r wrote:Haven't you heard 64-bit support more than 4GB installed RAM? Plus, why does 64-bit need to looks nicer than 32-bit? Because of the extra "bits"?Gmod1001 wrote:I do not get it, this is offtopic, but what is the point of the 64-bit version? sure it uses.... more bits.... but lets be honest, it doest improve your experience at all, it doesn't looks any nicer (Witch it should )
Proud bisexual Fur!
Re: vista build 5270
so that mean installation depends on key's, server key install server edition & client key's install vistaRob Jansen wrote:Build 5270.9 accepts both client keys and server keys.
Are you sure you didn't use an Server serial?
~~
This is build 5270.9, installed with an client serial.
~~~
EDIT:
Here is the 64-bit one (the one above is 32-bit).
will any one please post client keys
BTW i used this key :: R4HB8-QGQK4-79X38-QH3HK-Q3PJ6
jaidev66
-
ultrawindows
- Donator
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:30 pm
Re: vista build 5270
Windows Vista build 5270 Client:
R4HB8-QGQK4-79X38-QH3HK-Q3PJ6
Windows Vista build 5270 Server:
WBVG8-4JPQB-6HJ6H-XH7YY-D2GQY
R4HB8-QGQK4-79X38-QH3HK-Q3PJ6
Windows Vista build 5270 Server:
WBVG8-4JPQB-6HJ6H-XH7YY-D2GQY
Re: vista build 5270
lol i am so confused now because i used a client key & got server
i'll try that server key to get client (haha)
i'll try that server key to get client (haha)
jaidev66