Debombing Windows Build 9900

Discuss Windows Vista/Server 2008 to Windows 10.
gtgamer468
User avatar
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by gtgamer468 »

I thought that Datacenter had more virtualization features than Standard. But anyways, Applegame12345, could you share the iso of the disarmed version of Server build 9875?

yourepicfailure
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:40 pm
Location: Lufthansa DC-10

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by yourepicfailure »

gtgamer468 wrote:Would I be able to upgrade it to Datacenter? I saw commands on the web that does this.
Using DISM, probably.
Because this build uses a custom SKU, ServerStandardEval, I had to use DISM to change the SKU to ServerStandard when I tried activating it(which still failed).
DragonWars wrote:what is the difference between standard and datacenter for home use?
For home use, absolutely nothing. Datacenter's license allows you to infinitely virtualize instances on a Datacenter licensed machine. In addition, it allows shielded virtual machines, infinite constrained storage replicas, and some other features that you probably don't know what they do being useless for you, and probably don't even work in this build. Standard (I run 2012R2 standard) will more than suffice for a home power user.
9875 is buggy. Its start menu has color problems (all programs menu uses illegible black text) among other glitches.
"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off"
Image
You will never tear me from the grasp of the Pentium M!

Applegame12345
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 6:14 am
Location: C:\Users\Applegame12345

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by Applegame12345 »

yourepicfailure wrote:
gtgamer468 wrote:Would I be able to upgrade it to Datacenter? I saw commands on the web that does this.
Using DISM, probably.
Because this build uses a custom SKU, ServerStandardEval, I had to use DISM to change the SKU to ServerStandard when I tried activating it(which still failed).
DragonWars wrote:what is the difference between standard and datacenter for home use?
For home use, absolutely nothing. Datacenter's license allows you to infinitely virtualize instances on a Datacenter licensed machine. In addition, it allows shielded virtual machines, infinite constrained storage replicas, and some other features that you probably don't know what they do being useless for you, and probably don't even work in this build. Standard (I run 2012R2 standard) will more than suffice for a home power user.
9875 is buggy. Its start menu has color problems (all programs menu uses illegible black text) among other glitches.
9785 has another bug. When you try to unpin an app from a taskbar, explorer crashes
Image
>>click here<< for some wiki editing

Applegame12345
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 6:14 am
Location: C:\Users\Applegame12345

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by Applegame12345 »

gtgamer468 wrote:I thought that Datacenter had more virtualization features than Standard. But anyways, Applegame12345, could you share the iso of the disarmed version of Server build 9875?
You can also upgrade it to Datacenter. https://trekker.net/archives/upgrade-th ... atacenter/
It also works on client versions.
Image
>>click here<< for some wiki editing

gtgamer468
User avatar
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by gtgamer468 »

I did manage to upgrade editions to Datacenter. The problem I'm now facing is Workstation Converter 2012 as it keeps throwing me critical errors like insufficient permission to the log files or initialization errors.

yourepicfailure
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:40 pm
Location: Lufthansa DC-10

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by yourepicfailure »

Must you seriously rely on some random program to do the easy stuff for you? What can it do that you can't yourself?
It's way easier to do it yourself than try to get a program originally written for Server 2012R1 to work on a broken post 2012R2 build.
"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off"
Image
You will never tear me from the grasp of the Pentium M!

Gustav Vasa
User avatar
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2018 6:48 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by Gustav Vasa »

Guys, could I ask you all a question? What spp folders are you all using to debomb these Windows 10 beta/Server 2016 beta builds, or in other words, where do these spp folders come from?

gtgamer468
User avatar
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by gtgamer468 »

I'll just share the link. I couldn't debomb it so maybe you could save the trouble by just downloading it courtesy of DragonWar. Here it is: https://mega.nz/#!HawFFIbQ!s0Iz4_KvqIUI ... JUgSLlQ3pk

DragonWars
User avatar
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2018 9:57 am

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by DragonWars »

I think it s not allowed to share links to modified builds on the forum

gtgamer468
User avatar
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by gtgamer468 »

I'm not sure. I can try to PM an admin to make sure.

Applegame12345
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 6:14 am
Location: C:\Users\Applegame12345

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by Applegame12345 »

gtgamer468 wrote:I did manage to upgrade editions to Datacenter. The problem I'm now facing is Workstation Converter 2012 as it keeps throwing me critical errors like insufficient permission to the log files or initialization errors.
Run it as administrator
Image
>>click here<< for some wiki editing

yourepicfailure
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:40 pm
Location: Lufthansa DC-10

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by yourepicfailure »

Client 9785 has been released today, x86 and amd64 english only checked and free. Very similar to 9785 server, except a bit more stable.
I don't recommend it, but if you must run a beta build go for that one.
"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off"
Image
You will never tear me from the grasp of the Pentium M!


gtgamer468
User avatar
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by gtgamer468 »

I would prefer that over the server version. Did anyone manage to debomb it?

DragonWars
User avatar
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2018 9:57 am

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by DragonWars »

look at the picture above

yourepicfailure
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:40 pm
Location: Lufthansa DC-10

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by yourepicfailure »

Are you able to activate it?
"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off"
Image
You will never tear me from the grasp of the Pentium M!

gtgamer468
User avatar
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by gtgamer468 »

It should be able to be activated with a Windows 8.x key (can be Windows 8 or 8.1). By the way DragonWar, images should be uploaded using the site's image uploader.

DragonWars
User avatar
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2018 9:57 am

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by DragonWars »

yourepicfailure wrote:Are you able to activate it?

Image

gtgamer468
User avatar
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by gtgamer468 »

Both indexes or just one of the two?

DragonWars
User avatar
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2018 9:57 am

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by DragonWars »

only pro (1)

gtgamer468
User avatar
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by gtgamer468 »

Thank you so much. I'll try installing it now.

DragonWars
User avatar
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2018 9:57 am

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by DragonWars »

give opinions when you finish, it seems stable at a first look

yourepicfailure
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:40 pm
Location: Lufthansa DC-10

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by yourepicfailure »

Could you pm me a link? This would be good for a vm.
"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off"
Image
You will never tear me from the grasp of the Pentium M!

gtgamer468
User avatar
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by gtgamer468 »

This build is pretty stable. There is one bug where you are trying to right-click Internet Explorer 11 and explorer crashes and restarts. Also, to install optional features like .NET Frameworks, Windows will ask you to connect to Windows Update, but it will fail. The fix to install optional features is to modify Group Policy Editor settings and mount the disc image. Search "gpedit.msc" then go to this path: "Computer Configuration/Administrative Tools/System". Then right-click "Specify settings for optional..." and press edit. Click Enabled and for "Alternative source path", enter "X:\sources\sxs" where X is the letter assigned to the mounted image. Then save your settings and then open cmd as administrator. Enter this command: "gpupdate /force" and then you can start adding in optional features.

yourepicfailure
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:40 pm
Location: Lufthansa DC-10

Re: Debombing Windows Build 9900

Post by yourepicfailure »

Or you can learn to use dism and install .net with a single command, without fiddling with group policies:

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/window ... ment--dism

The last section under "Use DISM with no Internet connectivity."
"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off"
Image
You will never tear me from the grasp of the Pentium M!

Post Reply