Windows Beta 1.02.02

[IamHere123]

I got a screenshot of this build:

[DiskingRound]

I got a screenshot of this build:

Do you have it, or so, where did you get it? A friend?

[Lucas Brooks]

Looks good but it still could be just a string hack. What a shame it is a low quality JPEG.
@IamHere123, same question: where did you get it? Also, do you have a better quality picture?

Edit: Converted to PNG and uploaded using the Image Uploader

[windowsio]

If we could get this build... It would be happiness like Premiere Edition
windows 1.x is amazing!

[johnlemon647]

We can track it down who sold it. I hope we find this beta soon.

[vio08]

I got a screenshot of this build:

I think the screenshot is fake.
The screenshot says "1985, 1986",



But the real image says "1985, 1985".

[ToMi1]

The real image says "1985, 1986", too. You have to look-up more closely.

[xelloss]

The real image says "1985, 1986", too. You have to look-up more closely.

Look at the position of the "1" of "1986". The letter below is different in the two pictures.

[Joet BERNARD]

Personally I read also "1985, 1985" because pixels not correspond to a "6".
And, there's two spaces in the photo between the comma and the second date, but only one in the supposed screenshot.

So, I think this screenshot is fake

[Lucas Brooks]

For some reason I see a 5 and a 6.

[xelloss]

Look at the alignment of the characters: there is indeed a difference.
One picture has a single space between the years, the other has two.