https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=os2zdkwMA4A
At 14:00 you can see the OOBE working, which is strange because 2465s OOBE is broken, at least in our copy. Maybe the poster has the original/uncorrupted ISO of 2465... we could ask him, but I'm not sure.
2465 OOBE working in a video(not sure if it's not fake)
-
DragonExagon
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 6:55 pm
- Location: Somewhere
Re: 2465 OOBE working in a video(not sure if it's not fake)
I've noticed that rmsinnovations isn't that active on YT, and , as now, the only way to contact him. It's more of a hit or miss.ovctvct wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=os2zdkwMA4A
At 14:00 you can see the OOBE working, which is strange because 2465s OOBE is broken, at least in our copy. Maybe the poster has the original/uncorrupted ISO of 2465... we could ask him, but I'm not sure.
It could be that he has got a modded version.
-
DiskingRound
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:26 pm
- Location: Inside the space between . and I
Re: 2465 OOBE working in a video(not sure if it's not fake)
Decided to do some analysis on the OOBE in 2465.
After closer examination, it turns out the OOBE in 2465 looks fine. The HTML's don't appear to be broken. Also, replacing the MSOOBE with the one from b2458 didn't work. So it appears to be either a virtualizer issue, a kernel (ntoskrnl) issue, or an IE issue. Or it could be a problem with the OOBE and I simply haven't looked into enough places...
After closer examination, it turns out the OOBE in 2465 looks fine. The HTML's don't appear to be broken. Also, replacing the MSOOBE with the one from b2458 didn't work. So it appears to be either a virtualizer issue, a kernel (ntoskrnl) issue, or an IE issue. Or it could be a problem with the OOBE and I simply haven't looked into enough places...
Offtopic Comment
I'd gotta love some of the comments that appear in MS code:
Code: Select all
<!-- This is the new code for the new buttons. Don't muck with it for now.