I am currently uploading this to the FTP. Sorry but my internet is slow.
Edit: Currently on the upload folder and will be on the download FTP
Screenshots:
It's actually the revision number. The build number is 18. The revision is 9.018. That's how BetaArchive and The Distractor labeled the builds.Overdoze wrote:Why do OS/2 betas always have weird version numbers?
Anyway, nice find.
Probably just like how 2000 betas are labeled 5.0, XP 5.1, and Longhorn 6.0. Not too sure about why they skipped 7 or the 9.99 version.Overdoze wrote:I meant why were OS/2 2.0/2.1 betas labeled 6.XXX, 3.0 betas 8.XXX and then even 9.99?
Windows betas make perfect sense to me, NT 4.0 was version 4.0, so 2000 is 5.0 and so on. But why in the world is OS/2 2.0 actually version 6.0?DiskingRound wrote:Probably just like how 2000 betas are labeled 5.0, XP 5.1, and Longhorn 6.0. Not too sure about why they skipped 7 or the 9.99 version.
I think it's Apollo, i will find out once I get access to my main computer. As for 9.014, it's not on any warez CD's I'm aware of. In any case, it's out there somewhere.Overdoze wrote:If it's mentioned in the NFO, it's possible that the same group released it earlier. I'd be interested in what's the name of the group, perhaps it's on one of the other discs I found.
Code: Select all
≥ This version has been optimized a lot since build 14 ≥
≥ and can actually be used in a daily basis. ≥
≥ Base OS installation will eat up 110mb of your disk ≥
≥ and if you add Win-OS/2 support another 10-15mb ≥
≥ will be used .... ≥