Windows Triton: Difference between revisions

From BetaArchive Wiki
No edit summary
m (Some minor changes)
Line 1: Line 1:
The confidential documents used against Microsoft in the ''Comes vs. Microsoft'' case provide information that Microsoft codename Triton was indeed NOT a service pack for the unreleased successor to Windows ME, Windows Neptune, but a successor! The documents show the planned service packs for Triton and shows the planning of what it will run on. The documents state that the release of Triton will be in Q4 of 2001 (though Neptune was never released, the NT names Neptune, Odyssey, and Triton were scrapped.) The document also states on page 67 that the RTM for Triton was planned in March 2001. Service Pack 1 was planned for May 2001, and Service Pack 2 was planned for September 2001. Service Pack 3 was also dated for January 2002 and Service Pack 4 for July 2002. Microsoft was planning for a x64 bit version of Neptune, as well as Triton. In the Windows Desktop Product Roadmap on page 26, it describes Triton as a minor release to NepTune userbase; continue refining products based on PC capability
The confidential documents used against Microsoft in the ''Comes vs. Microsoft'' case provide information that Microsoft codename Triton was NOT a service pack for the unreleased Windows Neptune, but it's successor. The documents show the planned service packs for Triton and shows the planning of what it will run on. They also state that the release of Triton will be in Q4 of 2001 (though Neptune was never released, the NT names Neptune, Odyssey, and Triton were scrapped.) The document also states on page 67 that the RTM for Triton was planned in March 2001. Service Pack 1 was planned for May 2001, and Service Pack 2 was planned for September 2001. Service Pack 3 was also dated for January 2002 and Service Pack 4 for July 2002. Microsoft was planning for a x64 bit version of Neptune, as well as Triton. In the Windows Desktop Product Roadmap on page 26, it describes Triton as a minor release to NepTune userbase; continue refining products based on PC capability.
 
It is unknown wheter any builds of Triton were ever compiled, though it was probably canceled during planning stages.




Line 46: Line 48:
----
----


''All info showed above can be found in this PDF file below. Page numbers are defined as the numbers on the bottom right hand corner of the page. NOT the Adobe page numbers.''
''All info showed above can be found in this PDF file below. Page numbers are defined as the numbers on the bottom right hand corner of the page, NOT the Adobe Reader page numbers.''


http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/7000/PX07297.pdf
http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/7000/PX07297.pdf

Revision as of 17:13, 12 November 2011

The confidential documents used against Microsoft in the Comes vs. Microsoft case provide information that Microsoft codename Triton was NOT a service pack for the unreleased Windows Neptune, but it's successor. The documents show the planned service packs for Triton and shows the planning of what it will run on. They also state that the release of Triton will be in Q4 of 2001 (though Neptune was never released, the NT names Neptune, Odyssey, and Triton were scrapped.) The document also states on page 67 that the RTM for Triton was planned in March 2001. Service Pack 1 was planned for May 2001, and Service Pack 2 was planned for September 2001. Service Pack 3 was also dated for January 2002 and Service Pack 4 for July 2002. Microsoft was planning for a x64 bit version of Neptune, as well as Triton. In the Windows Desktop Product Roadmap on page 26, it describes Triton as a minor release to NepTune userbase; continue refining products based on PC capability.

It is unknown wheter any builds of Triton were ever compiled, though it was probably canceled during planning stages.


Microsoft's Main Focus

The document overview on page 73 of the confidential documents describes Triton as:


Overview

-Minor release/update to NT NepTune

-Date-driven to support new hardware

Market

-Standard: General Business, consumers, and work at homes

-Entry Level: Basic consumers only, new PC users

-High End: Technical workstation users

External Dates

-RTM: 4QFT01 (ALL)

Features - Standard

-Incremental shell improvements, particularly for consumers (new generation UI not delivered until next major NT release)

-IntelliMirrowZAW 2.0 enhancements

-Integrated storage enhancements

-Support new hardware

Features - Entry Level

-Subset of Standard

Features - High End

-Enhanced NT64 capablilities



All info showed above can be found in this PDF file below. Page numbers are defined as the numbers on the bottom right hand corner of the page, NOT the Adobe Reader page numbers.

http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/7000/PX07297.pdf