Difference between revisions of "Windows 3.x/3.00 RC2"

From BetaArchive Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
|bios = Unknown
 
|bios = Unknown
 
}}
 
}}
'''Windows 3.00 RC2''' is an unleaked pre-release version of [[Windows 3.x|Windows 3.0]].
+
'''Windows 3.00 RC2''' is an unconfirmed pre-release version of [[Windows 3.x|Windows 3.0]]. On 2019-09-18, in BetaWorld was posted page about this build. It contain screenshot with the about dialog, but it was actually not confirmed to be a real.<ref>https://wiki.betaworld.cn/Windows_3.0:3.0_RC2</ref>
 +
The page also shown that the build was originally leaked in 2019-09-17, it has the 1990-02-24 BIOS date and that the build is available in the BetaWorld FTP. Unfortunately, that information are actually unconfirmed, so it may be fake.
  
== BetaWorld reference ==
+
== Gallery ==
On 2019-09-18, in BetaWorld was posted page about this build. It contain screenshot with the about dialog, but it was actually not confirmed to be a real.<ref>https://wiki.betaworld.cn/Windows_3.0:3.0_RC2</ref>
 
The page also shown that the build was originally leaked in 2019-09-17 and it has the 1990-02-24 BIOS date. Unfortunately, that information are actually unconfirmed, so it may be fake. In BetaWorld was also mentioned that the build is in the BetaWorld FTP.
 
 
 
Also, the only leaked Release Candidate build is [[Windows 3.x/3.00 RC6|RC6]], but other RC builds may existed.
 
 
<gallery>
 
<gallery>
 
3.0RC2Version.png
 
3.0RC2Version.png

Latest revision as of 13:57, 16 January 2020

Windows 3.00 RC2
Build of Windows 3.x
Nopicture.png
Kernel 3.0
Architecture x86 (16-bit)
BIOS date Unknown

Windows 3.00 RC2 is an unconfirmed pre-release version of Windows 3.0. On 2019-09-18, in BetaWorld was posted page about this build. It contain screenshot with the about dialog, but it was actually not confirmed to be a real.[1] The page also shown that the build was originally leaked in 2019-09-17, it has the 1990-02-24 BIOS date and that the build is available in the BetaWorld FTP. Unfortunately, that information are actually unconfirmed, so it may be fake.

Gallery

References