User talk:ToMi1/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

From BetaArchive Wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
: {{ping|X010}} I deleted my talk page because it was corrupted, and then because it was MCpillager's spam. [[User:ToMi|ToMi]] ([[User talk:ToMi|talk]]) 10:50, 25 May 2020 (BST)
: {{ping|X010}} I deleted my talk page because it was corrupted, and then because it was MCpillager's spam. [[User:ToMi|ToMi]] ([[User talk:ToMi|talk]]) 10:50, 25 May 2020 (BST)
:: Mcpillager's spam is not a reason to delete it - it should be archived. This deletion makes it difficult to view past histories, which is important in a wiki. [[User:X010|X010]] ([[User talk:X010|talk]]) 17:41, 25 May 2020 (BST)
:: Mcpillager's spam is not a reason to delete it - it should be archived. This deletion makes it difficult to view past histories, which is important in a wiki. [[User:X010|X010]] ([[User talk:X010|talk]]) 17:41, 25 May 2020 (BST)
::: The spam was only ".", so I don't see any reason to archive it. [[User:ToMi|ToMi]] ([[User talk:ToMi|talk]]) 19:16, 25 May 2020 (BST)

Revision as of 19:16, 25 May 2020

A couple of notes

  • Don't delete your talk page, archive it if necessary.
  • The question on whether a build should be here is based on existence (that is, whether it is fake or not), not specifically on whether it is "notable".

X010 (talk) 10:17, 25 May 2020 (BST)

@X010 I deleted my talk page because it was corrupted, and then because it was MCpillager's spam. ToMi (talk) 10:50, 25 May 2020 (BST)
Mcpillager's spam is not a reason to delete it - it should be archived. This deletion makes it difficult to view past histories, which is important in a wiki. X010 (talk) 17:41, 25 May 2020 (BST)
The spam was only ".", so I don't see any reason to archive it. ToMi (talk) 19:16, 25 May 2020 (BST)