User talk:Dans34: Difference between revisions
From BetaArchive Wiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
>>it isn't done this way in any wiki i've seen or edited. I think it will just become too colorful and hard to read when all articles will look like this... Wikis are simple & minimalistic ;-) - [[User:Fzajac|Fzajac]] 17:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | >>it isn't done this way in any wiki i've seen or edited. I think it will just become too colorful and hard to read when all articles will look like this... Wikis are simple & minimalistic ;-) - [[User:Fzajac|Fzajac]] 17:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
surely the current revision looks better than http://www.betaarchive.co.uk/wiki/index.php?title=Windows:95:224&oldid=113 << plain | |||
Revision as of 18:06, 19 March 2010
Tables - what for?
Hello, you've just edited the Windows:95:224 article inserting the content in tables. IMHO, that isn't correct way to edit wiki, tables aren't here for that pourpose. - Fzajac 17:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
it looks better with them tables besides we all like abit of color --Dans34 17:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
>>it isn't done this way in any wiki i've seen or edited. I think it will just become too colorful and hard to read when all articles will look like this... Wikis are simple & minimalistic ;-) - Fzajac 17:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
surely the current revision looks better than http://www.betaarchive.co.uk/wiki/index.php?title=Windows:95:224&oldid=113 << plain
