https://www.betaarchive.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Windows_2000&feed=atom&action=historyTalk:Windows 2000 - Revision history2024-03-29T09:00:40ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.39.3https://www.betaarchive.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Windows_2000&diff=14696&oldid=prevLilShootDawg: unconfirmed2019-03-19T20:23:47Z<p>unconfirmed</p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 20:23, 19 March 2019</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l2">Line 2:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 2:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Many builds' pages say "This build was mentioned in a Google Groups discussion", but it's only suspected of their existence, and not proven at all. For example, there is 1942's supposed discussion where a guy asks for help with this build, and has no answers. Searching for his name gives nothing consistent. The date seems to prove it might be real, but other than that, there's not solid proof for this build. And this is the case for other builds as well.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Many builds' pages say "This build was mentioned in a Google Groups discussion", but it's only suspected of their existence, and not proven at all. For example, there is 1942's supposed discussion where a guy asks for help with this build, and has no answers. Searching for his name gives nothing consistent. The date seems to prove it might be real, but other than that, there's not solid proof for this build. And this is the case for other builds as well.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">:That's why it's under Unconfirmed. --[[User:LilShootDawg|LilShootDawg]] ([[User talk:LilShootDawg|talk]]) 20:23, 19 March 2019 (GMT)</ins></div></td></tr>
</table>LilShootDawghttps://www.betaarchive.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Windows_2000&diff=14690&oldid=prevSistemaRayoXP: /* Credibility for some builds */ new section2019-03-19T18:49:06Z<p><span dir="auto"><span class="autocomment">Credibility for some builds: </span> new section</span></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>== Credibility for some builds ==<br />
<br />
Many builds' pages say "This build was mentioned in a Google Groups discussion", but it's only suspected of their existence, and not proven at all. For example, there is 1942's supposed discussion where a guy asks for help with this build, and has no answers. Searching for his name gives nothing consistent. The date seems to prove it might be real, but other than that, there's not solid proof for this build. And this is the case for other builds as well.</div>SistemaRayoXP