Talk:Windows 2000: Difference between revisions
From BetaArchive Wiki
(→Credibility for some builds: new section) |
LilShootDawg (talk | contribs) (unconfirmed) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Many builds' pages say "This build was mentioned in a Google Groups discussion", but it's only suspected of their existence, and not proven at all. For example, there is 1942's supposed discussion where a guy asks for help with this build, and has no answers. Searching for his name gives nothing consistent. The date seems to prove it might be real, but other than that, there's not solid proof for this build. And this is the case for other builds as well. | Many builds' pages say "This build was mentioned in a Google Groups discussion", but it's only suspected of their existence, and not proven at all. For example, there is 1942's supposed discussion where a guy asks for help with this build, and has no answers. Searching for his name gives nothing consistent. The date seems to prove it might be real, but other than that, there's not solid proof for this build. And this is the case for other builds as well. | ||
:That's why it's under Unconfirmed. --[[User:LilShootDawg|LilShootDawg]] ([[User talk:LilShootDawg|talk]]) 20:23, 19 March 2019 (GMT) |
Latest revision as of 20:23, 19 March 2019
Credibility for some builds
Many builds' pages say "This build was mentioned in a Google Groups discussion", but it's only suspected of their existence, and not proven at all. For example, there is 1942's supposed discussion where a guy asks for help with this build, and has no answers. Searching for his name gives nothing consistent. The date seems to prove it might be real, but other than that, there's not solid proof for this build. And this is the case for other builds as well.
- That's why it's under Unconfirmed. --LilShootDawg (talk) 20:23, 19 March 2019 (GMT)