Talk:Windows 2.x: Difference between revisions

From BetaArchive Wiki
(Created page with "I have checked the source material you linked and there is no mentioning anywhere of "Presentation Manager" being the codename fo Windows 2.x. Please provide source for this c...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I have checked the source material you linked and there is no mentioning anywhere of "Presentation Manager" being the codename fo Windows 2.x. Please provide source for this claim. Additionally, the CPU architecture field in the infobox is meant for '''CPUs''' that the OS supports, not the entire computer systems. Windows 2.x will run on any PC-compatible with an Intel 8086/8088/80286/80386 CPU. Please fix these issues. --DeFacto
I have checked the source material you linked and there is no mentioning anywhere of "Presentation Manager" being the codename fo Windows 2.x. Please provide source for this claim. Additionally, the CPU architecture field in the infobox is meant for '''CPUs''' that the OS supports, not the entire computer systems. Windows 2.x will run on any PC-compatible with an Intel 8086/8088/80286/80386 CPU, as such this includes far more systems than just IBM and Compaq machines. Please fix these issues. --DeFacto

Revision as of 09:44, 22 July 2015

I have checked the source material you linked and there is no mentioning anywhere of "Presentation Manager" being the codename fo Windows 2.x. Please provide source for this claim. Additionally, the CPU architecture field in the infobox is meant for CPUs that the OS supports, not the entire computer systems. Windows 2.x will run on any PC-compatible with an Intel 8086/8088/80286/80386 CPU, as such this includes far more systems than just IBM and Compaq machines. Please fix these issues. --DeFacto