(reply) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It is not the intention to fan the flames, so to speak, but would it not be possible to include original details? There are several of which I can conceive that the competitors do not have. ([[User:Maza|Maza]] ([[User talk:Maza|talk]]) 23:33, 7 July 2019 (BST)) | It is not the intention to fan the flames, so to speak, but would it not be possible to include original details? There are several of which I can conceive that the competitors do not have. ([[User:Maza|Maza]] ([[User talk:Maza|talk]]) 23:33, 7 July 2019 (BST)) | ||
: {{ping|Maza}} What do you mean by "original details"? [[User:X010|X010]] ([[User talk:X010|talk]]) 08:25, 8 July 2019 (BST) | : {{ping|Maza}} What do you mean by "original details"? [[User:X010|X010]] ([[User talk:X010|talk]]) 08:25, 8 July 2019 (BST) | ||
::{{ping|X010}} I apologize for the confusion. By "original details" I mean details that are not mentioned elsewhere (e.g., at BetaWiki). The current list of facts on the "Do you know" page includes details that ''are'' mentioned elsewhere. |
Revision as of 22:12, 8 July 2019
It is not the intention to fan the flames, so to speak, but would it not be possible to include original details? There are several of which I can conceive that the competitors do not have. (Maza (talk) 23:33, 7 July 2019 (BST))
- @Maza What do you mean by "original details"? X010 (talk) 08:25, 8 July 2019 (BST)
- @X010 I apologize for the confusion. By "original details" I mean details that are not mentioned elsewhere (e.g., at BetaWiki). The current list of facts on the "Do you know" page includes details that are mentioned elsewhere.