Microsoft KB Archive/108175
Contents of GETLESS.TXT in FOXPROW\GOODIES\FNDATION
2.50 2.50a 2.50b WINDOWS kbreadme
The information in this article applies to:
Below is the complete FoxPro for Windows GETLESS.TXT file found in the FOXPROW\GOODIES\FNDATION subdirectory.
NOTE: This file contains eight questions about the EX1.APP application and how it implements a foundation READ. The answers to these questions are in the GETANS.TXT file. Both the EX1.APP and GETANS.TXT files are located in the FOXPROW\GOODIES\FNDATION subdirectory.
------------------------------------- Coordinating Windows, Menus, and READ -------------------------------------
This note explains our thinking on new MODAL and associated window concepts. It also introduces some minor improvements in FoxPro which are available starting with FoxPro 2.5.
Event Loop Programming
In order to produce applications with event-driven interfaces like FoxPro's own interface, some sophisticated developers have resorted to event loop programming similar to that utilized inside FoxPro itself and in environments like the Macintosh and Windows.
We feel that coding a real event loop in the FoxPro language has very limited practicality for three reasons. First, the speed of the resulting application will be sub-optimal. Second, such an application is always in hard execution and, therefore, a CPU hog and unfriendly in multiprogramming environments like DESQview, Windows, or the Mac MultiFinder. Finally, such event loop programming is VERY complex conceptually, probably too complex for all but the most skilled developers and certainly inaccessible to beginners.
That event loop programming was ever needed is, in fact, evidence of inadequate documentation and an incomplete original design. That event loop programming ever worked at all is testimony to the ingenuity and skill of you developers.
Improvements have been made in FoxPro 2.0 so that event loop programming should almost never be required.
Single READ Interactions (with Multiple Windows)
With FoxPro 2.0 it is very easy to incorporate many windows into a single READ. FoxPro handles virtually all aspects of coordinating windows containing GETs with other windows--notably Browse and text editing windows- -more or less automatically.
Our general recommendation is that a single READ should correspond to a single interactive session, dedicated to a particular objective, regardless of the number of windows involved. For example, a single READ might be used for customer file maintenance, entering invoices and associated detail lines, entering hours worked into a payroll application, etc. If desired, such single READ interactions can include access to desk accessories, Browse windows, etc. Moreover, it's possible to restrict access to other windows as desired by use of the MODAL clause in conjunction with the WITH clause.
The overall application structure which is most obvious and easiest to implement is to use traditional hierarchical menus, buttons, or other controls to invoke a series of single READ interactions which accomplish the application's objectives. This approach is generally recommended and produces applications which may have many lovely, object oriented, multi- window, event driven features, but which are traditional in overall architecture.
Programming Single READ Interactions
The basic idea is to encompass in a single READ all the windows that you intend to interact with at a particular READ level. READ MODAL simply means that the user is prevented from interacting with windows not included in READ's cooperating set of windows. You will not be able to close, zoom, minimize, or move windows not involved in a READ MODAL. Also, if BEEP is SET ON, it'll beep when you click on a forbidden window.
You can now control actions taken when windows are brought forward solely
by use of the READ's ACTIVATE and DEACTIVATE clauses. The basic change was in DEACTIVATE. Formerly, DEACTIVATE would attempt to prevent windows from coming forward if the DEACTIVATE expression returned .F. Also, bringing a window forward which was not one of the READ windows would terminate the READ.
This behavior (a) didn't generally work, (b) created insurmountable bugs, and (c) made it very difficult to coordinate BROWSE and other windows with READ in a controlled manner. (Upon reflection, you'll note that forcing termination of a READ when a non-READ window was brought forward is what actually forced you to write your own event loops in the first place.)
In addition, this odd behavior could not be emulated under Windows or on the Mac. Here's what READ does now:
READ MODAL: Windows which aren't specified as part of the READ or as an associated window can't be brought forward or interacted with in any way. Noting this difference, the following applies... READ When a window containing GETs is active and you click on a new window or select one with the keyboard: a. The new window is brought forward, and then b. The DEACTIVATE function is evaluated. At the time the DEACTIVATE function is evaluated, WONTOP() returns the new top window's name and WLAST() returns the name of the window formerly on top. Note, if you don't want to permit the new window to come on top just ACTIVATE WINDOW (WLAST()) in your DEACTIVATE function. (Note the name expression.) The value returned by the DEACTIVATE function answers the question "Shall the READ be terminated": .T. terminates it and .F. doesn't. You could, of course, always return .T. and emulate the old behavior. Finally, if a new window remains on top after the DEACTIVATE clause is executed, and if it's a window containing GETs, its ACTIVATE function is evaluated.
Note that in this deceptively simple change, lies the key to easily coordinating BROWSE and other windows within a READ. The 'Clients' part of the sample 'Organize' application illustrates the use of these new constructs. We'll upload a project named INV (to Library 2) which utilizes the tutorial databases to demonstrate how two Browse windows can be coordinated with a READ. Please index DETAIL.DBF on INO and PARTS.DBF on PNO before trying to run it.
By the way, none of the above is incompatible with your FoxPro 1.02 applications. If a READ contains no new 2.0 clauses and it's a single- window READ, it's terminated when another window is brought forward. Of course, the Screen Builder generates READ CYCLE by default, which triggers the new behavior.
Coordinating Multiple READs
Now let's discuss how to coordinate multiple (possibly multi-window) READs in an application. It is actually possible to create applications which are as modeless and fluid as FoxPro's own interface.
From the interface point of view, it is entirely possible to write completely event-driven applications, applications where you can switch from one interactive session to another simply by clicking on the desired window. However, the constraints of your application will almost certainly dictate some limitations. For example, you can't permit updates to your general ledger in the midst of printing your balance sheet, you can't permit checks to be printed in the midst of calculating your payroll, etc.
Also even though we've tried to make it as simple as possible, completely event driven programming remains conceptually complex. You will want to approach this area with care, starting with modest objectives.
For example, a good approach might be to start by permitting, say, customers to be added, zip codes to be looked up, etc. in the midst of posting orders just by pointing at the appropriate window and clicking. In other words, pick a few of your single-READ interactions and permit them to interoperate just like FoxPro's own interface does. See the examples provided for illustrations of how to accomplish this.
Eventually, the sophisticated developers among you will doubtless develop templates to automate or semi-automate this process.
Improvements in FoxPro
a. A READ with no GETs may now have a VALID clause. Such a READ will be
called either a "GET-less" or "foundation" READ. The rationale for the term "foundation" should become clear below. Such a VALID clause is triggered by any event which would otherwise terminate the READ. If the VALID returns .T. the READ terminates, if it returns .F. the READ continues.
b. When a GET-less READ having a VALID clause is executing, menus now
c. GET-less READs are now terminated in two ways:
1. Mouse clicks or keystrokes NOT associated with menu selection or activating an OKL. Note that selecting items from a menu or executing an OKL routine, specifically DOES NOT automatically terminate a GET-less READ. Also, if a menu is activated but no selection is made, the READ is not terminated. 2. In addition, GET-less READs are terminated whenever an immediate child READ terminates (not a grandchild READ). More precisely, if a READ at RDLEVEL() terminates, and if the READ at RDLEVEL()-1 is GET-less, the foundation READ is terminated after the child READ has been shut down. This is almost what used to happen. The difference is that,
formerly, ANY keystroke or mouse click terminated a GET-less READ. d. When a window containing GETs which is involved in the current READ is
closed, either via the Window menu or the mouse, the window is deactivated and hidden, but not released. This permits triggering of both the VALID and DEACTIVATE clauses, first VALID then DEACTIVATE. Within these clauses it is as if CTRL+W had been pressed. Formerly, closing any window involved in the current READ would immediately and unconditionally terminate the READ.
e. GENSCRN now emits code which does NOT redefine windows if they already
exist. A new generator directive, #REDEFINE, has been added which causes GENSCRN to emit old-style code, i.e. so windows are always redefined whether or not they already exist.
f. GENSCRN has also been modified so, if a required DBF is already open
when the SPR is executed, its current file position is left unchanged. If you always want to start at the top of the file, code 'GO TOP' in your setup code.
g. WONTOP(), WLAST(), WOUTPUT() and similar functions which are used to
check window attributes, have been modified so they now return .F. if they are called with an argument naming a non-existent window. Formerly, they generated an error and this necessitated circumlocutions like: IF WEXIST("fred") and WONTOP("fred")
h. A new function WREAD([<window>]) has been provided. This function
returns .T. if the named window is included in the currently executing READ and .F. otherwise. If no argument is coded, WONTOP() is assumed. That is 'WREAD()' is the same as 'WREAD(WONTOP())'.
i. READKEY() now accepts an optional argument of 1 which causes it to
return more specific information about why a READ has been terminated. The specific termination codes returned by READKEY(1) are: 1 None of the following causes 2 CLEAR READ caused termination 3 A terminating control (like a push button) was selected 4 A READ window was closed 5 The DEACTIVATE clause returned .T. 6 The READ timed out
j. The maximum number of nested READs has been increased to 5.
EX1: Event-Driven Example #1
The first example is called 'EX1'. It demonstrates coordination of four different READ interactions, each of which use the 'control3' control panel. You can switch from one to the other just by clicking on the application window.
Applications are launched by use of the Application menu. Execution of the entire system can be terminated by use of the Exit option in the Application menu.
This example has been designed so you can utilize any available desk accessories or windows in conjunction with the application windows: Help, Filer, Calculator, Calendar/Diary, ASCII Chart, Special Characters, and Puzzle, editor windows, the project window, etc.
Before you attempt to write your own multi-READ event driven code, we recommend you carefully study EX1 and be certain you can answer the following questions about its operation:
1. What would happen if the menu handling routine always immediately
launched the requested application, regardless of RDLEVEL()?
2. Why is it necessary to specify the 'IN EX1.MPR' clause in the menu
command in the Application menu?
3. Where is the code that handles the situation where an application window
is closed manually either by clicking in its close box, or by selecting Close from the File menu?
4. What's the largest number of READs which are ever active at any one time
while EX1.APP is executing?
5. What ensures that the control panel vanishes when the last remaining
application window is closed?
6. If you bring, say, the Calculator up on top of an application window, is
the application READ still active? The foundation READ?
7. When you're executing EX1.APP and neither an application window nor the
control panel is visible, and you're using, say, the Filer, is there any READ active?
8. When you're running in an application window and you click in another,
how is control transferred from the first application to the new one? What event triggers the transfer?
If you can answer all the above questions, you're ready to proceed to the next example. (We'll post the answers later.)
EX2: Event-Driven Example #2
This example is rather similar to EX1, but replaces the single invoice editing screen with the 'INV' application that, besides editing the invoice file, includes a different control panel 'control2' and two (2) BROWSE windows coordinated as part of the READ.
Study EX2 carefully and you'll see that the changes required to handle this rather more complex situation were rather simple. If you can answer the 8 questions above about EX1, you should have no difficulty with EX2. And by now, you should have a general idea how to proceed in your own applications.
Additional reference words: FoxWin 2.50 2.50a 2.50b KBCategory: kbreadme KBSubcategory: FxprgMacrosub
Keywords : FxprgMacrosub Version : 2.50 2.50a 2.50b Platform : WINDOWS
Last Reviewed: May 1, 1996