Windows 7 build 6933 leaked?

Post by **zeehonden_3** » Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:07 pm

Check this:

http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?s ... 688552&hl=

It might be true, (if false, please delete topic) because this is a list with PDC builds: 6.1.6926.winmain.081009-1855
6.1.6932.winmain.081017-1835
6.1.6933.winmain.081020-1842
6.1.6935.winmain.081022-1857

Post by **Prog** » Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:14 pm

Hope it's true. Very interested after seeing the screenshots today.

Post by **Resplendent** » Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:17 pm

I think it's incredibly lame that most of the UI changes aren't in the PDC distributed build. They show it all off but then go "NEENER NEENER NEENER YOU CAN'T HAVE IT UNTIL BETA HAHA!"

Post by **XDude** » Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:20 pm

Resplendent wrote:I think it's incredibly lame that most of the UI changes aren't in the PDC distributed build. They show it all off but then go "NEENER NEENER NEENER YOU CAN'T HAVE IT UNTIL BETA HAHA!"

I have to tell you that a PDC build is for devloper creating software, not of the public to evaluate whats in the os.
Check out longhorn 4051. It is completely stripped for that purpose.

Post by **Thlump** » Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:20 pm

Why 6933? Why not 6935?

Anyway, it's going to leak no matter what happens, just wait for some time or start googling for the torrent

Post by **QuiescentWonder** » Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:39 pm

Of course the PDC build is going to leak, if you can even call it a leak. Microsoft is giving it out. I'm a bit skeptical of the idea that these other builds will leak though with how locked down and secret the rest of Windows 7 development has been. I've heard from a few people 6933 has though, I hope it's true.

Post by **bns06** » Tue Oct 28, 2008 9:25 pm

6801 is the build they're giving out minus the superbar

Post by **Deathwarder** » Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:52 pm

would be awesome if 6933 leaked.

Post by **XDude** » Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:27 pm

MS will always give us the worst build.
Remember 5219, we got the one without he sidebar, which they demo a different 5219 with the sidebar. Then they hadd 5221, 5223 and 5226.

Post by **QuiescentWonder** » Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:39 pm

XDude wrote:MS will always give us the worst build.
Remember 5219, we got the one without he sidebar, which they demo a different 5219 with the sidebar. Then they hadd 5221, 5223 and 5226.

That's because the sidebar had a memory leak... or other problems. They won't release it because it isn't the most tested... or also because PDC stands for Professional Developers Conference. They're giving it to people who are expected to be developing software for Windows 7. The new taskbar might not be something a lot of developers are focused on. They don't just say "They'll like this one, let's not give it to them."

Post by **sibbl** » Wed Oct 29, 2008 12:52 am

QuiescentWonder wrote: The new taskbar might not be something a lot of developers are focused on. They don't just say "They'll like this one, let's not give it to them."

I don't think so ... have a look at the new possibilites of the so called 'Superbar' on long zhengs flicker account

Post by **Kenneth** » Wed Oct 29, 2008 12:54 am

Here are the filenames:

Windows 7 32-bit: 6801.0.080913-2030_Client_en-us_ULTIMATE-ULTIMATE_GB1CFRE_EN_DVD.iso
Windows 7 64-bit: 6801.0.080913-2030_Client_en-us_ULTIMATE-ULTIMATE_GB1CXFRE_EN_DVD.iso
Windows 7 Server 64-bit: 6801.0.080913-2030_amd64fre_Server_en-us-GB1SXFRE_EN_DVD.iso
Windows 7 32-bit Symbols: Windows_Winmain.6801.0.080913-2030.X86FRE.Symbols.msi
Windows 7 64-bit Symbols: Windows_Winmain.6801.0.080913-2030.AMD64FRE.Symbols.msi
Windows 7 32-bit SDK: 7.0.6801.0.3634.WindowsSDK_Windows7_idw.WindowsSDK.DVD.Release.iso
Windows 7 MCE SDK: WindowsMediaCenterSDK6.msi

Post by **constrictor** » Wed Oct 29, 2008 1:08 am

Man i can't wait until they lurk their way onto the web....

Post by **XDude** » Wed Oct 29, 2008 1:16 am

what are the symbols for? I don't remember, but I had a bunch of vista symbols from beta testing.

Post by **Kenneth** » Wed Oct 29, 2008 1:38 am

Debugging Windows DLLs/Exes.

Post by **Arths** » Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:52 am

Hey peoples!

Look here

http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?s ... 688552&hl=[/i]

Post by **Rob Jansen** » Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:05 am

arthmx wrote:Hey peoples!

Look here

http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?s ... 688552&hl=[/i]

Why do you post the link again?

zeehonden_3, AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE! wrote:'Check this:

http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?s ... 688552&hl=

It might be true, (if false, please delete topic) because this is a list with PDC builds: 6.1.6926.winmain.081009-1855
6.1.6932.winmain.081017-1835
6.1.6933.winmain.081020-1842
6.1.6935.winmain.081022-1857

Post by **harry4567** » Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:04 am

I think he is careless.
turn back to topic:6933...well....Strightly change......

Post by **fzajac** » Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:38 am

Hey, that's nice, i haven't been around for a while and much happened

Post by **squidward_** » Wed Oct 29, 2008 12:09 pm

Sorry if I am going a bit offtopic here, but didn't the Build 5219 of Vista with the sidebar leak? Its just that I found a link somewhere for Vista Build 5219's sidebar resources in a zipped file.

Post by **fzajac** » Wed Oct 29, 2008 12:30 pm

The sidebar was leaked separatelly and it worked on 5219 & 5231 AFAIK.

Post by **squidward_** » Wed Oct 29, 2008 2:42 pm

I also partially got it working in Build 5048 of Longhorn, except I couldn't actually get the gadgets to display (the gadgets list was empty) and was left with an empty strip down the left-hand side of the screen.

Post by **livelonger87** » Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:23 pm

Oh [censored] hell; [censored] mods, why did they lock the topic? Goddammit, we need this build!

Post by **XDude** » Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:26 pm

6933 never leaked, it was a MS demo build and will never leak

Post by **IsaacD** » Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:42 pm

livelonger87 wrote:Oh [censored] hell; [censored] mods, why did they lock the topic? Goddammit, we need this build!

Did you really seriously think this build of 7 actually leaked?

Unless someone managed to zip in and clone the entire HDD of the demonstration systems...then yeah, it would still be useless in that case.