Early Chicago builds research thread

Discuss Windows 95, 98 and ME.
Post Reply
Lucas Brooks
Posts: 773
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2018 11:37 am
Contact:

Early Chicago builds research thread

Post by Lucas Brooks »

Old Setup
Old Setup is the common name given to SETUP31.EXE, SETUP31.INF, SETUP31.VER, OLDSETUP.BAT and OLDSETUP.INF and OLDSETUP.PIF present in early Chicago builds. The core files of Old Setup (SETUP31.EXE, SETUP31.VER and OLDSETUP.INF) were last modified in early June 1993 so they came from a build compiled at roughly the same time. Old Setup with OLDSETUP.INF does not work on build 58s anymore due to 185 missing files. It is possible to get build 58s installed using Old Setup with dummy files and components from Windows for Workgroups 3.1 but the result produced is only a semi-working and more primitive looking 58s.

Old Setup can be divided into 2 phases - text and GUI. The text portion of Setup copies all core Setup files to the desired directory then launches GUI Setup. GUI Setup asks for username (but not organization), components to install and swap file settings before installation begins.

Image
Fig01: Setup prompts for username but not organization

Image
Fig02: Optional components that can installed

Image
Fig03: Swap file settings

Setup installs some components from Windows for Workgroups 3.1 (such as Microsoft Mail and Schedule+) that weren't included with build 58s. After the installation, W31TOCHI.EXE gets executed and I suspected that it makes changes to the system registry for Chicago since Chicago's registry is more complex than Windows 3.x's. Printer Setup and Network Setup happens after the execution of W31TOCHI.EXE which is then followed by updates to AUTOEXEC.BAT and CONFIG.SYS. OPROGMAN.EXE, the Temporary Program Manager gets executed right after that for setting up program groups just like Windows 3.x Setup. Setup then searches for application on the hard drive and launches SETUPFIX.EXE before it finishes.

Image
Fig04: Setup finishes

Chicago installed using Old Setup does not contain DOS and it is required to have MS-DOS 7 installed before running it. The boot screen uses SYSLOGO.RLE and there is no animation. MERGEREG.EXE was set as the shell, it adds SETUP.REG to the system registry, changes the shell to CABINET.EXE and launches File Cabinet. I can't get File Cabinet to load because of missing registry entries but Program Manager does work.

Image
Fig05: Chicago 58s installed by Old Setup with Program Manager as shell

It is worth mentioning that program groups are not converted to shortcuts automatically when Chicago was installed using Old Setup.

Chicago installed using Old Setup does not contain Tracker and Switch to Chicago which were present in KenOath's build 40. KenOath's build 40 is most likely fake as the GUI part of Setup is completely different. From what KenOath posted, it looks like build 58s Setup with old background. The dialogue about verifying username and organization in KenOath's build 40 is completely different to the one from Old Setup and it is exactly the same as the unused dialogue in SETUP.EXE (from build 58s). Build 40 was from early April but there is still no Tracker or Switch to Chicago in early-mid June so it is impossible for build 40 to have a 58s style Setup with Tracker and Switch to Chicago.

A mockup of early Microsoft Chicago installation procedure:

Image

Early UI designs

Image

...Image..CABINET.EXE was called File Cabinet (without >>) in the Usability Testing builds and the icon was silver. In early July, the icon suddenly became golden like in one of the concepts. It became a link with lower case "C" and silver icon in build 58s.

     Image...Network was named World (without >>) in early July and the icon was different, similar to the one in that concept as well.

ImageRecycle Bin was called Wastebasket back then. It changed its name multiple times throughout the development of Windows 95.

The idea of having a close button at the right hand side of the title bar was already there in early July and here are some more alternatives:

Image

The idea of storing minimized windows on the taskbar was already there in early July as well.

Image

Here is a concept of the new File > Open dialogue:

Image

DVINTHEHOUSEMAN
User avatar
Posts: 386
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2017 12:39 am
Location: Northern Wisconsin

Re: Early Chicago builds research thread

Post by DVINTHEHOUSEMAN »

I thought there was already one of these threads
DV
Go check me out on YouTube!

mrpijey wrote:Or someone slipped on a banana peel, fell backwards and accidently hit both the betaarchive.com and "DDoS Express" buttons at the same time.

LangsamSpieler
User avatar
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:38 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Early Chicago builds research thread

Post by LangsamSpieler »

This GIF at the end are the same Build than the 2 Usability Builds, because there are a Taskbar but without a Systemclock. Im pretty sure that this is the first Usability Testing Build of Chicago because this looks very similar to that.
416175:38 BetaArchive Registration
416176:06 First BetaArchive Post
4251811:32 Archive Access Granted

Ghdgtdgu Sakuratya
User avatar
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2019 7:58 am
Location: Siknature

Re: Early Chicago builds research thread

Post by Ghdgtdgu Sakuratya »

How can I enable this interface?
Do I need the floppy disk of WFW3.11 to get the file from the floppy disk when Setup prompts for the file?

Steve42424
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri May 24, 2019 6:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Early Chicago builds research thread

Post by Steve42424 »

Ghdgtdgu Sakuratya wrote:
Sat Jan 25, 2020 4:33 am
How can I enable this interface?
Do I need the floppy disk of WFW3.11 to get the file from the floppy disk when Setup prompts for the file?
It is the old setup with some Chicago build 58s and 3.11FW files. Probably it can be done with 3.11FW files because I tried the same thing and setup is running correctly. But it needs more files so I canceled.
LangsamSpieler wrote:
Fri Jan 24, 2020 11:18 am
This GIF at the end are the same Build than the 2 Usability Builds, because there are a Taskbar but without a Systemclock. Im pretty sure that this is the first Usability Testing Build of Chicago because this looks very similar to that.
It is very similar to Usability Testing Build but I think there is one difference. The eye button doesn't looks the same with Old setup build.
Image

Lucas Brooks
Posts: 773
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2018 11:37 am
Contact:

Re: Early Chicago builds research thread

Post by Lucas Brooks »

Steve42424 wrote:
Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:39 am
It is very similar to Usability Testing Build but I think there is one difference. The eye button doesn't looks the same with Old setup build.
Image
Did you see the word "mockup"? Of course this is based on all the other images, videos and mockups so not a real build. There is NO "Old Setup build" - it is just 58s.

Post Reply