Win 2.11 286 and COMMAND.COM issue

Discuss MS-DOS, Windows 1, 2 and 3.
Post Reply
ovctvct
Posts: 1058
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:19 pm

Win 2.11 286 and COMMAND.COM issue

Post by ovctvct »

I have DOS=LOW(using dos 6.22 with setver win200.bin 3.40) in config.sys, himem and emm386 loaded, EMS appears to work, but when trying to run COMMAND.COM this happens:
Image

I am using 86box with a 386SX 40MHz, 16MB RAM, which should be more than enough to run command.com

louisw3
User avatar
Posts: 1490
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 7:29 pm
Location: SE Asia

Re: Win 2.11 286 and COMMAND.COM issue

Post by louisw3 »

I'd stick with dos 3.3
"Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly." – Henry Spencer

BF10
User avatar
Posts: 219
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Win 2.11 286 and COMMAND.COM issue

Post by BF10 »

louisw3 wrote:I'd stick with dos 3.3
Yes, COMMAND.COM will only run in a window if you're using DOS 3.3 or below.
Image

BetaWiki contributor.

yourepicfailure
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:40 pm
Location: Lufthansa DC-10

Re: Win 2.11 286 and COMMAND.COM issue

Post by yourepicfailure »

Even more important, guy says he's using 286 version.

Guy, I'd recommend using win 2.11 386 next time.
"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off"
Image
You will never tear me from the grasp of the Pentium M!

johnlemon647
User avatar
Posts: 296
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 5:52 pm
Location: State of Georgia USA
Contact:

Re: Win 2.11 286 and COMMAND.COM issue

Post by johnlemon647 »

Try setver win200.bin 3.30.

louisw3
User avatar
Posts: 1490
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 7:29 pm
Location: SE Asia

Re: Win 2.11 286 and COMMAND.COM issue

Post by louisw3 »

yourepicfailure wrote:Even more important, guy says he's using 286 version.

Guy, I'd recommend using win 2.11 386 next time.
True the 386 version with it's hypervisor is way more fun, although the Windows portion is still the same, running in real mode.

The 286 version is more so interesting as it'll let you run MS-DOS windowed and launch more than one. Although the memory crunch of the 286 in real mode hits hard and quick. While the 386 version just creates a new v86 machine per dos instance, giving far more memory. Also the 386 version has far more complete hardware emulation allowing the VGA / EGA version of Windows/386 to run CGA programs in a window.
"Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly." – Henry Spencer

yuhong
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:47 am

Re: Win 2.11 286 and COMMAND.COM issue

Post by yuhong »

I think I remember having to make or use a PIF for it to run.

Post Reply