Would BETA Archive be saving more revenue?

[A.S. aka nanocomp.invent.]

Wouldn't BETAArchive be saving more money if the website was hosted under the ".org" or ".net" top-level domain names, instead of ".com"?

[oscareczek]

.org is for organisations. BetaArchive is not an organisation.
.net is, according to Wikipedia, for companies connected with Internet, like ISPs. BetaArchive has nothing to do with that.
You can't move BetaArchive to any .sth better than .com

[mrpijey]

Of course we can move BetaArchive to an another top-level domain, but we don't pay that much for the .com address so the save would be minimal at best. The brunt of the cost goes to server hosting, bandwidth and hardware.