Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Discuss Windows 2000, NT, XP and Windows Server 2000, 2003, SBS 2003.
Post Reply
Drapy
User avatar
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2016 8:17 pm
Location: Belarus

Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by Drapy »

XP means eXPerience in the long name.
Nope, I'm back on the same old account.

Battler
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 2117
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:13 am
Location: Slovenia, Central Europe.
Contact:

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by Battler »

Evidently, Microsoft decided to drop the year branding starting with Windows XP, though not completely. The Server editions still use the year branding to this day (the latest being Windows Server 2016), and Windows XP used it for the MCE editions (MCE 2003/2004/2005), and the regular XP said "Version 2002" in System Properties.
Main developer of the 86Box emulator.
Join the 86Box Discord server, a nice community for true enthusiasts and 86Box supports!

The anime channel is on the Ring of Lightning Discord server.

Check out our SoftHistory Forum for quality discussion about older software.

LuLu
Permanently Banned
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 5:32 am

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by LuLu »

wasn't whistler at begining called Whistler 2001 ?
but anyhow, Consumer variants of NT are better without year
while Business // Server with

DanielOosterhuis
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:52 pm

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by DanielOosterhuis »

Microsoft's naming schemes have always been over the place, in comparison to the fairly consistent naming scheme of Apple's operating systems. The reason Microsoft dropped the naming scheme of years has probably got to do something with NT becoming the standard for all computer users, not just workplaces and servers. With Windows 2000, they had several Server editions which introduced the Active Directory system, and Microsoft, in a bid to stay consistent there, probably decided to reserve the year names to the Server versions of Windows, whereas the home or workstation user would get a more personal operating system with a easier to market name, like XP and Vista. Of course, that was then dropped for numbers again, which also got inconsistent (7, 8, 10), but so far Windows Server versions still get named after their release year.
Last edited by DanielOosterhuis on Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MCSA: Windows Server 2016 (70-740, 70-741, 70-742)
MTA: 98-349, 98-365

AlphaBeta
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 2439
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2012 4:33 pm
Location: Czechia

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by AlphaBeta »

Because some marketing guy (probably a whole team) decided that it's going to be called so.
AlphaBeta, stop brainwashing me immediately!

Image

DanielOosterhuis
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:52 pm

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by DanielOosterhuis »

AlphaBeta wrote:Because some marketing guy (probably a whole team) decided that it's going to be called so.
Yep. And time and time again, Apple does show that their marketing team has it together more than Microsoft's. Hate 'em or love 'em, it's just the truth.
MCSA: Windows Server 2016 (70-740, 70-741, 70-742)
MTA: 98-349, 98-365

nixie
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2017 2:33 pm
Location: in his mother's basement

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by nixie »

Offtopic Comment
DanielOosterhuis wrote:
AlphaBeta wrote:Because some marketing guy (probably a whole team) decided that it's going to be called so.
Yep. And time and time again, Apple does show that their marketing team has it together more than Microsoft's. Hate 'em or love 'em, it's just the truth.
In Microsoft's defense, Linux distros are known to use equally bizarre and confusing version names..
Last edited by nixie on Mon Dec 04, 2017 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

AlphaBeta
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 2439
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2012 4:33 pm
Location: Czechia

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by AlphaBeta »

Ubuntu has a pretty logical naming system these days.

Regarding MS, they tried to introduce a logical system for codenames several times. Just remember Chicago, Nashville, Memphis. Or more recently, Whistler, Longhorn, Blackcomb, where Whistler and Blackcomb are two peaks in Canada and Longhorn is some facility located between the two mountains, or so I recall.
AlphaBeta, stop brainwashing me immediately!

Image

MasonSparkle
User avatar
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:24 am
Location: UK

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by MasonSparkle »

To be fair to the whole situation, as most people know in Whistler 2211 the watermark did say "Whistler Windows 2001 Professional", so they knew they would be aiming to release the full OS in 2001, but it was still in codename at that time (March 2000) before they named it eXPerience.
Or more recently, Whistler, Longhorn, Blackcomb, where Whistler and Blackcomb are two peaks in Canada and Longhorn is some facility located between the two mountains, or so I recall.
Yes, Longhorn is a bar & grill in the middle of the two mountains (Whistler & Blackcomb) as what I have read & heard from various sources.
Mason Sparkle

Full-on Windows nerd who loves to explore classic OSes, Betas & cancelled projects.
I'm also addicted to BBQ Hula Hoops & Lemon Fanta.

Mister RoyFoy1
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 9:29 pm

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by Mister RoyFoy1 »

Don't forget Janus, Cougar, Neptune, Odyssey and Triton

Drapy
User avatar
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2016 8:17 pm
Location: Belarus

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by Drapy »

Mister RoyFoy1 wrote:Don't forget Janus, Cougar, Neptune, Odyssey and Triton
Janus, Cougar and Triton arent the codenames of XP. Cougar is the fake codename and it's the Server one.
Neptune and Odyssey both merged into Whistler, and they are not the final names of XP.
Nope, I'm back on the same old account.

nixie
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2017 2:33 pm
Location: in his mother's basement

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by nixie »

Drapy wrote:
Mister RoyFoy1 wrote:Don't forget Janus, Cougar, Neptune, Odyssey and Triton
Janus, Cougar and Triton arent the codenames of XP. Cougar is the fake codename and it's the Server one.
Neptune and Odyssey both merged into Whistler, and they are not the final names of XP.
It looks like he was just listing codenames and their themes.

Random_User
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1222
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:48 am

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by Random_User »

Drapy wrote:Cougar is the fake codename
Actually, there is a reference to "Windows Version 3.20 (Cougar)" in setup31.ver.
Drapy wrote:and it's the Server one.
Windows Small Business Server 2008 to be exact.

Drapy
User avatar
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2016 8:17 pm
Location: Belarus

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by Drapy »

Random_User wrote:
Drapy wrote:Cougar is the fake codename
Actually, there is a reference to "Windows Version 3.20 (Cougar)" in setup31.ver.
Drapy wrote:and it's the Server one.
Windows Small Business Server 2008 to be exact.
Ok, thanks for correcting me.
Nope, I'm back on the same old account.

WATERMELONS10
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:44 am
Location: California, United States of America

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by WATERMELONS10 »

Maybe it was to bring it in line with Office XP's name. XP is supposed to stand for "eXPerience" and I think Microsoft wanted to streamline the product names. Although, they did change it up when they released Office 2003.

Random_User
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1222
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:48 am

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by Random_User »

WATERMELONS10 wrote:Maybe it was to bring it in line with Office XP's name.
The final names for both products were announced simultaneously.

WATERMELONS10
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:44 am
Location: California, United States of America

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by WATERMELONS10 »

At the end of the day, who knows, except for those that worked at Microsoft when the name was made. Microsoft sure has an interesting way of counting to 10; 3.1, 3.5, 3.51, 4.0, 2000, XP, Vista, 7, 8, 10. If you are wondering where 95, 98, and ME are, I am just counting the NT lineup.

Darkhero
User avatar
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2018 4:22 pm

Re: Why Windows XP isn't named as 2001 in the first place?

Post by Darkhero »

According to the official press release, XP, or eXPerience, was meant to symbolize "the rich and extended user experiences Windows and Office can offer by embracing Web services that span a broad range of devices." My guess is that with the new direction and release plan that Microsoft had, Windows and Office XP represented a new "generation" of software, while the server line was kept consistent with the earlier releases. I've also read somewhere that there were plans to make Windows and Office into a service at that time (hence the need for activation), but I can't find any sources on that right now.

Post Reply