Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Discuss Windows 95, 98 and ME.
Post Reply
LangsamSpieler
User avatar
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:38 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Contact:

Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by LangsamSpieler »

Before i installed Chicago 40, i have Windows 3.1 and the install of Chicago 40 was a sucess with the Other Locate to install.

I have a Problem with Chicago 40: I can't run a Application, it hang it on(not everything, network is a exception), i need the run command to get started and search the applications to get it run fron C:\Chicago\*.exe.
Can somebody say, what is the Problem??
Last edited by LangsamSpieler on Mon Apr 17, 2017 7:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

PlyrStar93
User avatar
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:48 pm
Location: guess it

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Peoblem

Post by PlyrStar93 »

Where did you get this build in the first place?

user99672
Donator
Posts: 1446
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:55 pm

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Peoblem

Post by user99672 »

PlyrStar93 wrote:Where did you get this build in the first place?
He likely hasn't, it's probably a well known fake, and more specifically, a reshack of 56. I would encourage him to share details or the 'build' itself to verify its authenticity

LangsamSpieler
User avatar
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:38 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Peoblem

Post by LangsamSpieler »

I got the Beta iso here: http://old-dos.ru/index.php?page=files& ... ow&id=4821
And here the 4.00.40
416175:38 BetaArchive Registration
416176:06 First BetaArchive Post
4251811:32 Archive Access Granted

Overdoze
User avatar
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:28 am
Location: Slovenia

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by Overdoze »

Yes, that's fake.
All roads lead to Neptune™

KRNL386 - my site about retro computing | My site about Windows 1.0 | My blog | 86Box Manager | LeakDB - list of PC OS warez leaks

LangsamSpieler
User avatar
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:38 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by LangsamSpieler »

How is that possible, i downloaded those with the chop. Is it possible, i downloaded a real Build and run a Fake version?
416175:38 BetaArchive Registration
416176:06 First BetaArchive Post
4251811:32 Archive Access Granted

Overdoze
User avatar
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:28 am
Location: Slovenia

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by Overdoze »

It's a fake build made a long time ago that is still available online unfortunately... There is no real Chicago build 40 leaked at the moment.
All roads lead to Neptune™

KRNL386 - my site about retro computing | My site about Windows 1.0 | My blog | 86Box Manager | LeakDB - list of PC OS warez leaks

LangsamSpieler
User avatar
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:38 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by LangsamSpieler »

Very bad, i can't belive it, that a real Chicago 40 aren't exist.
416175:38 BetaArchive Registration
416176:06 First BetaArchive Post
4251811:32 Archive Access Granted

LangsamSpieler
User avatar
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:38 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by LangsamSpieler »

Image

This is the Build 40, what i self installed. I think it's really a fake Version.
416175:38 BetaArchive Registration
416176:06 First BetaArchive Post
4251811:32 Archive Access Granted

DiskingRound
User avatar
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:26 pm
Location: Inside the space between . and I

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by DiskingRound »

It is. IIRC Battler found some files on his PC, submitted them to his private IRC for investigation, and someone made a frankenbuild with them.

In any case it's mostly fake with a handful of (possibly) real 40 files. Nothing new under the sun.

LangsamSpieler
User avatar
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:38 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by LangsamSpieler »

Thanks to say.
416175:38 BetaArchive Registration
416176:06 First BetaArchive Post
4251811:32 Archive Access Granted

LangsamSpieler
User avatar
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:38 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by LangsamSpieler »

I found the real Build: http://www.mediafire.com/download/2m55e ... __x86.iso

install it from dossetup!
And nothing hangs on by the opening.
416175:38 BetaArchive Registration
416176:06 First BetaArchive Post
4251811:32 Archive Access Granted

Wheatley
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1839
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:19 pm
Location: shell32.dll

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by Wheatley »

Sure, real...
Windows Defender for great justice! Bugs are an international trading company. I need to defeat the anti-debugging and obfuscation methods. It wasn't for Intel's absurd ability to load in ie6. Why even waste time with people in an envelope?

LangsamSpieler
User avatar
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:38 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by LangsamSpieler »

I don't want to edit the Table of Contents from Betawiki, i will be careful for everything.
416175:38 BetaArchive Registration
416176:06 First BetaArchive Post
4251811:32 Archive Access Granted

DiskingRound
User avatar
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:26 pm
Location: Inside the space between . and I

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by DiskingRound »

That's build 56 with a few files modified. Nothing new to see here.

LangsamSpieler
User avatar
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:38 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by LangsamSpieler »

But this build is a stable one.
416175:38 BetaArchive Registration
416176:06 First BetaArchive Post
4251811:32 Archive Access Granted

Wheatley
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1839
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:19 pm
Location: shell32.dll

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by Wheatley »

Stable, yet fake. Not the quality most betas want to be known for.
Windows Defender for great justice! Bugs are an international trading company. I need to defeat the anti-debugging and obfuscation methods. It wasn't for Intel's absurd ability to load in ie6. Why even waste time with people in an envelope?

LangsamSpieler
User avatar
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:38 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by LangsamSpieler »

I think i know one characteristic of the fake Chicago: it has the Programm "Switch to Chicago" and the real builds don't have it.
416175:38 BetaArchive Registration
416176:06 First BetaArchive Post
4251811:32 Archive Access Granted

Overdoze
User avatar
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:28 am
Location: Slovenia

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by Overdoze »

There is no real Chicago 40 out there... How many times do we have to tell you this? All the copies you came across so far were encountered countless times before and they're all proven fakes. If you don't believe me, grab a copy of build 58s and do a binary comparisson of the files. You'll immediately realize 99% of the files are the same with changed version strings.

So please, for the love of god, do some investigation next time before you flood the forum with your garbage posts.
All roads lead to Neptune™

KRNL386 - my site about retro computing | My site about Windows 1.0 | My blog | 86Box Manager | LeakDB - list of PC OS warez leaks

rthdribl
User avatar
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:05 am

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by rthdribl »

LangsamSpieler wrote:I found the real Build
I think I know what's the issue here and since I don't want you to get discouraged (you're new), I'll fill in the missing parts.

1. the comments of all other users are correct: there is no build 40 "out there". It was obviously made, it was either leaked or supplied to the testers, but nobody archived it. Parts of an already-installed copy are the only remaining trace of it

2. although your perseverance is (and will be) appreciated and I hope will develop in time, the tone of the responses you received comes from the key thing you probably don't know: Chicago 40 is kind of a "big deal". It was searched for very long and in a, let's say, sophisticated manner. It is therefore safe to assume that known accessible FTP archives (not only the one here), big uploaders (like mediafire) and all processed bootleg/scene/warez CDs and FDs do not contain a copy of Build 40.

3. The search continues all the time. There are still no results. That means that unless you have a new search method or are able to provide some media, the links you find in the internet will lead to a fake copy.

I wish you good luck with your search :beta:
MINI NT EXECUTIVE Version 1.0
rthdribl

LangsamSpieler
User avatar
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:38 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by LangsamSpieler »

Thank's to say this, i have now more courage to make new posts and other things.
416175:38 BetaArchive Registration
416176:06 First BetaArchive Post
4251811:32 Archive Access Granted

Battler
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 2117
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:13 am
Location: Slovenia, Central Europe.
Contact:

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by Battler »

rthdribl wrote:Parts of an already-installed copy are the only remaining trace of it
If you mean the handful of files I found, I actually think those are most probably fake, in fact I warned about that when I provided them, but my warning seems to have been disregarded. :p
Main developer of the 86Box emulator.
Join the 86Box Discord server, a nice community for true enthusiasts and 86Box supports!

The anime channel is on the Ring of Lightning Discord server.

Check out our SoftHistory Forum for quality discussion about older software.

rthdribl
User avatar
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:05 am

Re: Windows Chicago Build 40 Problem

Post by rthdribl »

Battler wrote: If you mean the handful of files I found, I actually think those are most probably fake, in fact I warned about that when I provided them, but my warning seems to have been disregarded. :p
I'm sorry, I only heard about it via a repost of a repost of a repost, long ago after I gave up on 40. I should have not been so specific while not being sure.
Offtopic Comment
now is anyone researching that Cairo build that recently resurfaced....
MINI NT EXECUTIVE Version 1.0
rthdribl

Post Reply