[Offer] Fujitsu-Siemens Reliant UNIX 5.44C40

Download requests and offers should be made in this forum.
Do not request a download if you have under 10 posts. You will be ignored.
Forum rules
Please read the following rules before posting a download request in this area:

1. Don't post a request if you have under 10 posts as stated in the rules. If you do anyway, it will be deleted without further notice.
2. Requests for anything against our rules will not be entertained and you will be warned.
3. Check that we don't already have the file on our FTP servers by using the database linked in the navigation.
Post Reply
the_doctor2
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2015 9:54 pm

[Offer] Fujitsu-Siemens Reliant UNIX 5.44C40

Post by the_doctor2 »

Image

This is for the MIPS based RM200/300/400 servers.
I copied this years ago during an internship and don't have access to the original media, so its iso only.

https://mega.nz/#!HhFGzSbC!7-HmM20o-Kkt ... 0eCQREsojA

Edit: larger 300 dpi scan is included in the upload.

-t_d

Darkstar
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1254
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:29 pm
Location: Southern Germany

Re: [Offer] Fujitsu-Siemens Reliant UNIX 5.44C40

Post by Darkstar »

Nice, thanks a lot!

Just for reference, here are some manuals for Reliant UNIX
I upload stuff to archive.org from time to time. See here for everything that doesn't fit BA

wbyte
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 152
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 8:40 pm

Re: [Offer] Fujitsu-Siemens Reliant UNIX 5.44C40

Post by wbyte »

Nice find. I still run 5.43 at home on RM400

Code: Select all

SYSTEM V/68 Release 3.0  Version 1-Rev_A  M68020
sysV68
Copyright (c) 1984 AT&T
Copyright (c) 1985 Motorola, Inc.
All Rights Reserved

DJ Deedahx
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 479
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:56 pm

Re: [Offer] Fujitsu-Siemens Reliant UNIX 5.44C40

Post by DJ Deedahx »

Interesting find.

As I was looking this up, it says its supported platforms were NSC-32x32, Intel 80186, Intel 80386, Intel 80486, MIPS...
I wonder if PCem would do a good job at emulating this. :/
DDX — 86Box Staff/Power User & YouTube Channel Manager

Darkstar
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1254
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:29 pm
Location: Southern Germany

Re: [Offer] Fujitsu-Siemens Reliant UNIX 5.44C40

Post by Darkstar »

DJ Deedahx wrote:Interesting find.

As I was looking this up, it says its supported platforms were NSC-32x32, Intel 80186, Intel 80386, Intel 80486, MIPS...
I wonder if PCem would do a good job at emulating this. :/
Huh? Where did you "look [that] up"? The photo of the disc is pretty clear on which machines this will run. No PCem I know can emulate MIPS CPUs. Maybe (just MAYBE) at some point MAME will be able to run it. But not yet
I upload stuff to archive.org from time to time. See here for everything that doesn't fit BA

DJ Deedahx
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 479
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:56 pm

Re: [Offer] Fujitsu-Siemens Reliant UNIX 5.44C40

Post by DJ Deedahx »

Darkstar wrote:Huh? Where did you "look [that] up"?
*cough* Wikipedia. *cough*
DDX — 86Box Staff/Power User & YouTube Channel Manager

the_doctor2
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2015 9:54 pm

Re: [Offer] Fujitsu-Siemens Reliant UNIX 5.44C40

Post by the_doctor2 »

DJ Deedahx wrote:
Darkstar wrote:Huh? Where did you "look [that] up"?
*cough* Wikipedia. *cough*
Then look again. There is a whole bunch of distinct varieties of Sinix:
  • * The original Sinix: NSC-32x32 (up to Sinix 5.2x) and Intel 80486 CPUs (Sinix 5.4x - non MIPS) in their MX-Series
    * SINIX-N, SINIX-O, SINIX-P, SINIX-Y for RM-200, RM-300, RM-400 and RM-600, all MIPS
    * SINIX-L for the PC-MXi on the Intel 80386 processor
    * SINIX-Z for the SNI WX-200 and other IBM-compatible i386 PCs on the Intel 80386 and newer processors
This is Reliant UNIX and is the successor to Sinix-N and will only run on MIPS. Maybe you could extend gxemul to emulate the RMxxx and then run it.
The easiest way to run any Sinix today would be Sinix-Z, if you can find it.

Btw. I just fould Sinix-N 5.43C20 at http://old-dos.ru/index.php?page=files& ... 7#download

-t_d

Post Reply