Microsoft Neptune 5022.1
Re: Microsoft Neptune 5022.1
But why those files are in Windows Me?
Re: Microsoft Neptune 5022.1
I'm afraid you are not right as well. First, IE in Neptune uses version 5.00.2919.3800:DeFacto wrote:EvNik i have to dissapoint you but 3825 is from IE 5.5, and 5111.2 is just a recompiled file, otherwise it wouldn't be in 5111.1. In 5111.1 the only thing that could be an earlier neptune build is 5095.1 (tosdvd.sys), everything else (e.g. 4026 etc.) is just from IE 5.5.EvNik wrote:I have looked at Neptune 5111 system32 folder files. And I've found some interesting things:
Files from Build 3825:
And from Build 5111.2 (we all have 5111.1):
However I didn't look at other folders...
... and there are some system files with such version either, related to IE eg:
... while I can hardly find any mention of version 5.5 (except th logo) in the IE. This is also to prove this:
Offtopic Comment
-Why do you call this software "beta"?
-Because it is better than nothing.
-Because it is better than nothing.
-
DeFacto
Re: Microsoft Neptune 5022.1
what i meant were IE 5.5 files in ME, as many people (meaning me as well in the past) mistake them for neptune builds, which they arent. a few examples:
-2919.XXXX
-4134.XXXX
-48XX.XXXX
The only two build numbers that could be from Neptune and not from IE 5.5 are 4925 and 4928. See here for details.
The reason why you can find files from 9X in NT and vice versa is because some apps were ported from one platform to another to reduce work... Still image device monitor in ME 2332.2 is an example, as it was ported from Neptune 5022.1...
-2919.XXXX
-4134.XXXX
-48XX.XXXX
The only two build numbers that could be from Neptune and not from IE 5.5 are 4925 and 4928. See here for details.
The reason why you can find files from 9X in NT and vice versa is because some apps were ported from one platform to another to reduce work... Still image device monitor in ME 2332.2 is an example, as it was ported from Neptune 5022.1...