Today, I checked AeroXP and I found that the list of all the Neptune builds was replaced by a new one, because it was proven that the old list is fake.
http://www.aeroxp.org/board/index.php?showtopic=11431 (contains both the new and old list)
Neptune Build 5000 doesn't exist?
-
Namronia
-
A.Nonymous
-
motherboardlove
- Donator
- Posts: 1237
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:43 pm
- Location: Milky Way Galaxy
- Contact:
-
Namronia
-
Namronia
there are 2 proven builds earlier than 5111, but the account a.nonymous is a ... and he doesnt have them, id wonder if he even has 5111lucas93 wrote:You never know. Maybe it's a build earlier than 5111.Namronia wrote:Hes a fake and doesnt have anything, sorry but i dont want you to have wrong hopes.
But I'll agree with you there.Thlump wrote:Pictures please, or it's fake.
Last edited by Namronia on Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
....Fake Files
14a. Do not accuse someone of having a fake file/build or faking something unless you have proof.
14b. Because of so many people arguing on the forum over fakes and the ongoing problems resulting from it, this rule is going to be heavily enforced. Any accusations without proof will result in a warning. Any further accusations without proof will result in a ban.
14c. If you suspect someone of faking files to annoy/con members, please contact an Admin or moderator about it so further action can be taken. Do not attempt to solve the situation yourself or you could end up in more trouble.
-
Dion
What are the 2 builds earlier than 5111 ?Namronia wrote:there are 2 proven builds earlier than 5111, but the account a.nonymous is a ... and he doesnt have them, id wonder if he even has 5111
And please don't quote file versions as being proof, different file versions
exist in ALL windows 2000 builds, regardless of the build version of the
operating system they're in.
-
Namronia
well, again file version are the only things i can say there, but if a file says "5.50.5022 - Microsoft Neptune Operating System" i see it was proof that it was from neptune 5022, dont you?Dion wrote:What are the 2 builds earlier than 5111 ?Namronia wrote:there are 2 proven builds earlier than 5111, but the account a.nonymous is a ... and he doesnt have them, id wonder if he even has 5111
And please don't quote file versions as being proof, different file versions
exist in ALL windows 2000 builds, regardless of the build version of the
operating system they're in.
Anyways, is there any proof for 5000? i dont think so...
-
Dion
What does build 5000, and it's questionable existence have to do with the questionNamronia wrote:well, again file version are the only things i can say there, but if a file says "5.50.5022 - Microsoft Neptune Operating System" i see it was proof that it was from neptune 5022, dont you?
Anyways, is there any proof for 5000? i dont think so...
I asked you ?
My question was, what proof do you have of there being 2 other, earlier builds of
neptune 5111, other than the fact that some files were found in other betas, whose
binaries reflected those from the neptune file versioning scheme.
-
Daniel1981
- Donator
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:09 am
-
squidward_
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:35 pm
- Location: United Kingdom
- Contact:
errrm... i'm sorry to say it but this propably won't you get anywhere...squidward_ wrote:If you have any rare Longhorn builds, again, please leak em!
IF A.Nonymous has something it's his decision if he's going to leak it or not & i don't think that pushing him will change the decision
@ A.Nonymous: could you tell the compilation date and hour of build 5000?
