Windows XP Build 5.2.3790, "Kernel Update"

Discussions about *nix and Other Operating Systems should go in this forum.
Kenneth
Donator
Posts: 2407
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:42 am

Post by Kenneth »

What's Left:
Component Installer.

ToastyCheesy
FTP Access
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:44 am
Location: Port Orchard, WA

Post by ToastyCheesy »

This will probably have to be a new install, right? I wouldn't be able to just patch this to my current installed copy of XP, or even upgrade it to this version, right?

fzajac
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1432
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by fzajac »

ToastyCheesy wrote:This will probably have to be a new install, right? I wouldn't be able to just patch this to my current installed copy of XP, or even upgrade it to this version, right?
I think you will be able to upgrade in the same way you upgrade XP to Server 2k3 (but i'm not sure).

happy dude
Donator
Posts: 2461
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:12 pm

Post by happy dude »

Might be able to provide hosting... depends. PM me if you want to talk about it

fusi0n
FTP Access
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 11:18 am

Post by fusi0n »

would it take updates for windows xp or server 2k3 ?

Dion

Post by Dion »

Windows OCManage wrote:It's VLK, and the CD Version will be the Standard Windows XP on Server 2003 Kernel and HAL. The DVD version will only be sent to those who want it.
I'm guessing the 1st post stating it's a trial, is to allow this to be public.
MS never made a trial VLK.

Kenneth
Donator
Posts: 2407
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:42 am

Post by Kenneth »

I said I made it VLK and a trial.

hounsell

Post by hounsell »

If you want to host it on a BA-accessible Server, feel free to upload it to my M1 server.

thenico
FTP Access
Posts: 130
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:13 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by thenico »

Windows OCManage wrote:I said I made it VLK and a trial.
The usual NT TimeBomb ?

The Distractor

Post by The Distractor »

I can betatest this; I have a box to test stuff on (not a virtual pc) so .. yeah. And if beta 1 works, i might just crack the timebomb&activation (TweakNT & AntiWPA) and use it for a lot longer on my test box ..

giusva95

Post by giusva95 »

woow... interesting project

DBlake
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 748
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:45 pm
Location: Two lefts and a diagonal sidestep from where you are.

Post by DBlake »

sounds like a good project.. is beta1 done?

4512jth
Donator
Posts: 556
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 3:04 am
Location: Minnesota, USA

Post by 4512jth »

is this not going to happen? I was really looking forward to it

Bender
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1524
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:30 pm

Post by Bender »

So which keyset does this use, as you mentioned that it accepted VL keys, but you included WPA, which VL copies do not use.
Image
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; mimic; rv:9.3.2) Clecko/20120101 Classilla/CFM
"Stupid can opener! You killed my father, and now you've come back for me!"

Dion

Post by Dion »

Bender wrote:So which keyset does this use, as you mentioned that it accepted VL keys, but you included WPA, which VL copies do not use.
Heh, yeah he lost me too, I questioned the vl key part but seemed to
touch on a raw nerve, and asked no further.

Derf
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 3938
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:09 pm
Contact:

Post by Derf »

Nothing further to add with this project? Pity. It had such great potential, and was one of the first projects to interest me since XPL.

zeehonden_3
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 682
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:46 pm

Post by zeehonden_3 »

How did you change the image by winver.exe?
Image

Rob Jansen
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 5271
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 1:05 pm
Location: The Collection Book
Contact:

Post by Rob Jansen »

It in MSGINA.dll or NTOSKRNL.EXE.

Replace it there.

xeeynamo
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:33 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Post by xeeynamo »

what are the advantages of the 5.2 kernel?

acfrazier
FTP Access
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:43 am

Re: Windows XP Build 5.2.3790, "Kernel Update"

Post by acfrazier »

So I take it this is dead then? Shame, it looked so promising.

zamadatix
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 2381
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:37 pm
Location: United States

Re: Windows XP Build 5.2.3790, "Kernel Update"

Post by zamadatix »

After 6 months and no update it is dead and there is no need to bump it...

Kenneth
Donator
Posts: 2407
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:42 am

Re: Windows XP Build 5.2.3790, "Kernel Update"

Post by Kenneth »

It's not dead. I'm trying to find out how to deploy it.

motherboardlove
Donator
Posts: 1237
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:43 pm
Location: Milky Way Galaxy
Contact:

Re: Windows XP Build 5.2.3790, "Kernel Update"

Post by motherboardlove »

Windows OCManage wrote:It's not dead. I'm trying to find out how to deploy it.
I could help if you want...
See my profile for my website link.

Kenneth
Donator
Posts: 2407
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:42 am

Re: Windows XP Build 5.2.3790, "Kernel Update"

Post by Kenneth »

I already have an idea: WIMs.

Kenneth
Donator
Posts: 2407
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:42 am

Re: Windows XP Build 5.2.3790, "Kernel Update"

Post by Kenneth »

Alpha 1 Refresh Released!

For installation, XPKU now uses WIMs, specifically Panther Engine 6.0.4053 (Beta1).

Credits:
WindowsX.......for some INF files.
Thuun.............for PantherXP project.
WinBETA.........for TweakNT

BTW, there might be some Server 2K3 leftovers. Please Report them.

Locked