Windows Chicago Build 440!?

Post by **vizerous** » Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:46 pm

I have received this build, but I do not know, real it or fake.. or it unleaked version? If yes, I for the first time in a life have though something rare

Version contain WIN95 "1,44" cab files up to 21, and have size 29 493 557 bytes.

Post by **Namronia** » Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:53 pm

looks real in my opinion

Post by **harry4567** » Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:46 pm

Picture Are Real

And then

thanks for your topic!

I add a chicago beta build in my mind

Post by **Gillian** » Mon Jul 21, 2008 4:42 pm

Sound interesting.

Post by **James** » Mon Jul 21, 2008 5:04 pm

Please Leak?

Post by **WinPC** » Mon Jul 21, 2008 5:41 pm

Please leak this build. It sounds very intresting and rare. You might want to leak it at Release-a-fortnight if you can, since that's what it's for.

By the way, where did you find it?

Post by **happy dude** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:29 am

vizerous wrote:I have received this build, but I do not know, real it or fake.. or it unleaked version? If yes, I for the first time in a life have though something rare

Version contain WIN95 "1,44" cab files up to 21, and have size 29 493 557 bytes.

Why is the CD for it dated to yesterday? Custom eh?

Post by **asiekierka** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:50 am

If we assume it is real, then he maybe only had the CAB files&setup.exe, no bootsector, no recorded CD, just the files. So he needed to record it again. If we ignore the CD date, it seems quite real. Quite.

Or... it may be just a fake.

Post by **Rob Jansen** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:14 am

Open up ones of the cabs, select DETAIL view and post a screenshot here.

Then we can confirm if its fake or real.

Post by **vizerous** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:35 pm

Why is the CD for it dated to yesterday? Custom eh?

If we assume it is real, then he maybe only had the CAB files&setup.exe, no bootsector, no recorded CD, just the files. So he needed to record it again. If we ignore the CD date, it seems quite real. Quite.

Or... it may be just a fake.

I create iso with UltraISO, for installing it in Virtual PC.

Open up ones of the cabs, select DETAIL view and post a screenshot here.
Then we can confirm if its fake or real.

Files into cab dated 6 april 1995, 8:00.

Please leak this build.

Im Sorry, but i didnt planing to leak it... yet.

Post by **Popbob** » Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:51 am

vizerous wrote:
Please leak this build.
Im Sorry, but i didnt planing to leak it... yet.

Then don't bother showing it off.

Post by **mdogg** » Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:56 am

vizerous wrote:
Please leak this build.
Im Sorry, but i didnt planing to leak it... yet.

Now is the time to remember the following thread: http://www.betaarchive.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4461

Post by **XDude** » Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:18 am

don't start a war now
he just was to show off the screenshots and that he has it

you could ask that ms employee why not leak server 7 instead showing off that info

Post by **mdogg** » Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:34 am

XDude wrote:don't start a war now
he just was to show off the screenshots and that he has it

you could ask that ms employee why not leak server 7 instead showing off that info

You're right. It's just that this is a community for betas and leaking is a big part of the community so it makes me angry when they keep builds tucked away.

Post by **vizerous** » Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:03 am

Sorry, I did not want anybody to angry. I understand, that betas and leaking is a big part of the community. Me has largly carried, that I get this unleaked beta, and I do not wish to miss chance, to have not lot of time something unleaked. Understand me correctly. Probably, i am leak it, but later..

Windows Chicago Build 440!?

Windows Chicago Build 440!?

Re: Windows Chicago Build 440!?