Windows 7 M1: Is it worth testing?

Any off topic discussions should go in this forum. Post count is not increased by posting here.
FTP Access status is required to post in this forum. Find out how to get it
Forum rules
Any off topic discussions should go in this forum. Post count is not increased by posting here.
FTP Access status is required to post in this forum. Find out how to get it
Post Reply
Bigern1990
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 7:02 am
Location: NJ
Contact:

Windows 7 M1: Is it worth testing?

Post by Bigern1990 »

Hey guys. Im still a little new here and can't wait to gain access to the beta/rtm release thread, but I still have a ways to go. I am happy that I finally found a forum/website with other people that love to beta test software. I started beta testing software since a very early release of Vista.

Anyhow...my friend gave me a Windows 7 M1 disc. He said that to install it I was going to have to set my bios clock back since it ended in June.

First off, are there really any significant changes from Vista that I will notice, or does alot of it have to do with the new micro-kernel and better performance.

I will probably test it out anyway, but want to know the gist ahead of time.

Would you guys recommend running it in a VM, or running it off of its own HDD?

Luthian
FTP Access
Posts: 263
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 4:32 am

Post by Luthian »

I would say that Its interesting to see some of MS' early work on Win 7 at the least. There are some differences that you will notice (for example some moderately extensive work on the start menu) but alot that you won't, at least not right off the bat.

As for VM or RM if you go with the VM you won't get any of the new tweaked aero effects but thats just about it (If you are worrying about it messing up your vista partition on your real machine, Win 7 will set up a dual boot without any issues. At least it did for me.)

Setting back your Virtual BIOS can be tricky and is a completely different process depending on which VM software you use, so it might actually be easier to use a separate partition.

If you do go with a real system, 99% of your Vista drivers should work on Windows 7 (I only had one fail myself)

Good Luck!

betaluva
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 2068
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:21 am
Location: Australia

Post by betaluva »

what different about the startmenue? do you have pics? i havnt bothered with m1 because i thought it was identical to vista.

strekship
FTP Access
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:33 am

Post by strekship »

I looked at it a little bit but deleted the VM. I didn't notice anything new with the start menu though (didn't pay close attention to it, might have missed something).

hounsell

Post by hounsell »

Well, in the start menu, there is a new method of pinning apps on the menu and when you search, the results take up the whole start menu, rather than just the application side.

Tootles
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 984
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:50 pm

Post by Tootles »

Is it a real disc? Can you scan the case and the cd label, if it is? I want to print them out so I can put it in a case.
Have a day.

Rob Jansen
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 5271
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 1:05 pm
Location: The Collection Book
Contact:

Post by Rob Jansen »

I think its a self made disc from a torrent or BA or another website

Smartie77
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 129
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:44 am
Location: Germany

the better vista .

Post by Smartie77 »

windows 7 is notable faster and overall very performant (compared to vista sp1 with all reliability patches )to me on the following machine :

AMD Athlon ( no 64bit, plain old socket 462 ), 1.8 GhZ
1024 MB DDR
Radeon 9550 AGP / 128MB
Asrock SiS based Mobo, C-Media AC97,USB,LAN.

Installed as Ultimate Edition.
It gets a "Windows Experience Index" of 2.9 ( Graphics) and 3.1 ( CPU/RAM )
It uses half to three quarter of the Ram, if many ( 7-9 ) windows and built-in apps open
It feels snappy and I haven't experienced a single freeze or "not responding" ( which happens sometimes in vista sp1 ).

I feel sorry that this has a timebomb , otherwise I would instantly use it as a main OS. It's the better Vista for me. I also like that the sidebar is gone, and the way the gadgets are now handled plus the new controls of WMp11.

Talking like this makes me install it now once more

Tootles
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 984
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:50 pm

Post by Tootles »

I can't get it to activate. At all.
Have a day.

XX55XX
FTP Access
Posts: 229
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:13 am

Post by XX55XX »

marktuson wrote:I can't get it to activate. At all.
It's not worth activating anyways. The beta does give you a 30-day grace period, so that should be more than enough time to check it out. I personally uninstalled this beta only after three days, because there wasn't too much to see.

Tootles
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 984
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:50 pm

Post by Tootles »

Hmm...

Roll on M2, then .
Have a day.

Resplendent
Donator
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:04 pm

Post by Resplendent »

I'd agree it did feel faster. Considering I had it running on a virtual PC with only 512 RAM, it felt at least as fast as Vista on 3GB, if not faster. Assuming it's not a fluke, that's pretty amazing to me, so hopefully if this keeps up through the dev cycle, 7 could blow Vista away on the performance end.

IainK
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 1:02 am
Location: Dundee, UK
Contact:

Post by IainK »

All i can say is about time!

Vista SP1 feels like beta 1 of whistler to me

Post Reply