Apparently, Windows XP Pro was built to be a Server OS.

Discuss Windows 2000, NT, XP and Windows Server 2000, 2003, SBS 2003.
Post Reply
James
User avatar
Staff
Posts: 2029
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:13 pm
Location: United States

Apparently, Windows XP Pro was built to be a Server OS.

Post by James »

Digging to the core of Explorer.exe, I found this picture hidden into the tag:

Bitmap/158/1033. There is a picture with: Codename Whistler Server , Woah. XP Pro must have been attempted to be a XP Server


odd.

Here is a screenshot of what I am talking about:

Image
James *~*~* BA Moderator | Alternate History writer

Namronia

Post by Namronia »

it was planned to be released as "XP server" but later done to server 2003 afaik

Vista Ultimate R2
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 2393
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Post by Vista Ultimate R2 »

It's just that when XP was released Server 2003 was still in beta, and as both OSes were built from the same core they both contained the same logos etc - just like there would have been Longhorn Professional and Longhorn Server logos in the Vista betas, XP had Whistler Pro and Whistler Server in it. Server 2003 is basically XP Server but with a slightly newer kernel as it came out later.
Image

Andy
User avatar
Administrator
Posts: 12622
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by Andy »

XP Pro works great as a server too if you ask me I use it at home and I've never had any problems at all. Runs smooth and flawlessly, just like a server should. I don't know why they didn't go ahead and use it rather than change it to 2003 and keep building on it.

Vista Ultimate R2
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 2393
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Post by Vista Ultimate R2 »

Presumably they were still working on the server components that XP lacks - they split the client and server releases as they felt that the pressures on the release that applied to the consumer client aren't the same as apply to server OSes so the two should be separate. XP is ok as a simple fileserver but doesn't have the advanced server components of the Server editions of Windows.
Image

betamaster
User avatar
Posts: 422
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:07 pm

Post by betamaster »

In XP 64 Bit Beta Build 3790 there are many things from Server 2003, and on first startup we see this...
I don`t know what i am looking :P
Image

eON

Post by eON »

Yeah but XP x64 basically is Server 2003.

donaldmylife
FTP Access
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 4:27 am

...

Post by donaldmylife »

You can run TweakNT.exe on xp and click "convert to Server",then restart, you will found that xp turn into "Whistler Server"

thenico
FTP Access
Posts: 130
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:13 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: ...

Post by thenico »

donaldmylife wrote:You can run TweakNT.exe on xp and click "convert to Server",then restart, you will found that xp turn into "Whistler Server"

Don't try that with Windows XP SP2 or SP3.
You will got a licence violation after the reboot.

But with windows xp rtm or xp sp1, it works very well
Image

Rob Jansen
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 5271
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 1:05 pm
Location: The Collection Book
Contact:

Post by Rob Jansen »

Dont covert it with Luna still activated, otherwise you get this:

Image

(i didnt black out the codes, but windows did that).

(The green piece, is the start button and start menu is all messed up, errors everywhere).

And also nice bootscreen

Image

Post Reply