BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Database Screenshots Gallery Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 2d, 4h, 18m | CPU: 8% | MEM: 5005MB of 11203MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 PostPost subject: Is any Windows 2.X beta?        Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2017 2:03 pm 
Reply with quote
Offline

Joined
Sun Nov 19, 2017 11:27 am

Posts
23

Favourite OS
5219
I'm just wondering ? Does exist a single Windows 2.X beta or the leaked ones are fake? Just MS released Windows 2.X without a single beta or they haven't been leaked. :beta:


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Is any Windows 2.X beta?        Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2017 2:08 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:19 pm

Posts
1057
....use the search function?

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Is any Windows 2.X beta?        Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2017 2:18 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:28 am

Posts
1577

Location
Slovenia

Favourite OS
5111
BetaVista wrote:
Just MS released Windows 2.X without a single beta


That would be ridiculous, so I think it's pretty clear they're just not leaked (yet).

_________________
Image

KRNL386 - my site about retro computing | My site about Windows 1.0 | My blog | 86Box Manager - my configuration manager for 86Box


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Is any Windows 2.X beta?        Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2017 4:24 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu May 01, 2014 10:26 pm

Posts
1500

Location
Inside the space between . and I

Favourite OS
Nashville 4.00.83
Here are some screenshots of Windows 2.0 betas.
ImageImageImageImageImage
Source: https://www.pcjs.org/pubs/pc/magazines/msj/MSJ-1987-05/
Thanks to SoftPCMuseum for finding them in April 15, 2017, this topic: viewtopic.php?f=59&t=35479

_________________
Image
You cannot escape Windows 10.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Is any Windows 2.X beta?        Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2017 9:25 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:05 am

Posts
164

Favourite OS
4015.lab06_n
I'm crazy about Windows 2.x betas as well, there's just so little information.

And every now and then, you open some old issue of a CHIP computer newspaper from 2000 and see this:

https://i.imgur.com/ezyspJ6.jpg

_________________
is the new Windows ready yet?
rthdribl


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Is any Windows 2.X beta?        Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 11:39 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:34 pm

Posts
11

Favourite OS
Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
I'm looking at the list of beta operating systems and it doesn't seem like there are many betas of Windows OS's pre-3.X period. No idea why that's the case, though.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Is any Windows 2.X beta?        Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 12:55 pm 
Reply with quote
Offline

Joined
Sun Nov 19, 2017 11:27 am

Posts
23

Favourite OS
5219
Also is no Windows 1x Pre-DP5 build because it isn't leaked or the copies have been destroyed.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Is any Windows 2.X beta?        Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:38 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:43 pm

Posts
446

Location
DLL Hell, United States

Favourite OS
Windows 2000 SP4 and XP SP3
BetaVista wrote:
Also is no Windows 1x Pre-DP5 build because it isn't leaked or the copies have been destroyed.

That is just what we unfortunately have to work with in dealing with these really old betas. There isn't much info available, let alone actual builds, due to the difficulty to leak anything. Companies such as Microsoft were much smaller back then, and usually kept pre-release builds to themselves, in fact, most info that we have were released by MS themselves to the press. Any developer builds were kept to themselves as, again, whoever leaked them can be easily identifiable, even when released to developers. It wasn't until the 90s where warez groups of the past first began paying attention to pre-release software like this. It is a damn shame, in some respects.

_________________
Do Not Make Illegal Copies Of This Signature.
YouTube | Twitter | BA Wiki | BetaWiki


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject: Re: Is any Windows 2.X beta?        Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 12:40 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:46 am

Posts
251

Favourite OS
OltScript System
rthdribl wrote:
I'm crazy about Windows 2.x betas as well, there's just so little information.

And every now and then, you open some old issue of a CHIP computer newspaper from 2000 and see this:

https://i.imgur.com/ezyspJ6.jpg


Very... special !!! :beta: :OD :P

DiskingRound wrote:


Note: On some images, it is well written Windows 2.00 :)

_________________
More information of OltScript System : http://www.win3x.org/win3board/viewtopi ... 69&t=15677
Internetometer : http://internetometer.com/give/46797
Image


Last edited by OltScript131 on Sun Nov 26, 2017 1:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject: Re: Is any Windows 2.X beta?        Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 1:02 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:28 am

Posts
1577

Location
Slovenia

Favourite OS
5111
Windows OS wrote:
Companies such as Microsoft were much smaller back then, and usually kept pre-release builds to themselves


That's not really true, since Microsoft released at least five developer releases, alpha, beta, PE and several other unknown builds between Beta and RTM to testers, so over 8 builds in a period of a year and a half. And that's Windows 1.0 alone, when the project was still rather small. Keeping pre-release builds to themselves doesn't make much sense, since in-house testers can only do so much work in a certain amount of time, so naturally they had to seek out external help. Your warez argument is correct, though. Pirates leaked many builds in the 90s, but unfortunately the PC warez scene was still in its infancy in the late 80s.

The more likely reason as to why these builds are rare nowadays is that they're, well... old. And the older something gets, the more likely it is someone will throw it away or it'll eventually deteriorate beyond recovery. Most software from the 80s is rare now because not many people still keep working 30+ year old installation disks (often in long obsolete formats too) around.

As far as Windows 3.0 goes, it was under a much stricter NDA than the previous versions, probably due to tensions with IBM regarding OS/2 development. Still, at least two builds made it into the warez scene and one was still kept on original media.

_________________
Image

KRNL386 - my site about retro computing | My site about Windows 1.0 | My blog | 86Box Manager - my configuration manager for 86Box


Top  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2019

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS