BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 52d, 13h, 4m | CPU: 24% | MEM: 5713MB of 10705MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 PostPost subject: vista build 6000 stability/speed/resource usage?        Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:19 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:06 am

Posts
258
As the title states, I am looking for information about the rtm build's speed, stability, and resource usage. Is anyone currently using it?


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Dont use the billgates release        Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:10 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
66
it is a nuked release and one group that i know of has a perfect release for the x86. Google for a AIO :wink:.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:05 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:19 am

Posts
1915

Location
New Zealand
how is it nuked?


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:26 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:45 pm

Posts
732

Location
Norway

Favourite OS
HP keystroke RPL
The one I got off the FTP was very fast compared to RC1, it's using about 500-600 mb ram right now and uses about 6 gig disk space (Vista Ultimate).

Can't say too much about stability, only used it for a few hours, but pretty decent performance, installed all my drivers except webcam, which Windows Update installed afterwards.


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:40 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
66
its nuked because it was modified with 5840 files and 5744 files.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:44 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Posts
2393
cooled wrote:
its nuked because it was modified with 5840 files and 5744 files.


Quite a few people seem to be saying the BillGates release was modified from the original, but how exactly? Which files are not the right ones? It seems to install and run fine.

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:25 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:45 pm

Posts
732

Location
Norway

Favourite OS
HP keystroke RPL
Some files are not 6000, like
secproc.dll - 6.0.5840.16389
newdev.dll - 6.0.5054.0

Both in System32.

Kind of weird, why would anyone modify a release like this except to fix bugs?


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:09 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Posts
2393
longview wrote:
Some files are not 6000, like
secproc.dll - 6.0.5840.16389
newdev.dll - 6.0.5054.0

Both in System32.

Kind of weird, why would anyone modify a release like this except to fix bugs?


Are they build 6000 files on the non-BillGates release though? Sometimes a few files slip through with old build numbers, for instance take a look at main.cpl in System32 on XP SP2:

Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp. 1991-1999 [XP files say -2001]
Product Name: Microsoft(R) Windows (R) 2000 Operating System
Product Version: 5.1.2403.1 [a Whistler Beta build number]

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 2:39 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
66
also there are files from 5744 if you look hard enough. also comparing the real wim to the billgates wim you would realize that the billgates wim is a bit off.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:21 am 
Reply with quote
well, back on topic, how is the speed compared to the RC2 release?


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:42 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:06 am

Posts
258
what about the one on andy's server?


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 7:53 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
Which one do you mean? The AIO DVD or the other release? The AIO DVD claims to be "100% RTM", where the other release in the "Vista RTM" folder which is about 2.4GB (it's the BillGates release, right?) seems to contain some older files.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:46 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:06 am

Posts
258
The one on Andy's ftp server, I think it is a 52 rared iso with the name vistartm


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 11:02 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
This is the "nuked" BillGates release that's supposed to have some files from 5840 and even 5744. The Vista AIO DVD that's on Andy's ftp as well should be 100% build 6000.


Top  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2018

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS